Quote:
|
Originally Posted by viivincent okay read your articles. Doesn't sound like the "study" is that conclusive: 56% to 45% come on! You're making it sound like you can influence the sex of your baby by your eating habits. even your articles if you read them for the facts and not just for the opinion of the author those chances are VERY slim. The study was done more to understand the apparent decrease in male births compared to female births in industrial countries. |
As with many initial studies, they are merely a means of trying to test a hypothesis. In this case, they are trying to determine whether or not the results from more extensive studies done with other animals translate to humans....and they did find some evidence of that...accordingly, more research is being done since obviously only by being able to replicate the results can they determine whether or not something is truly effective.
Many studies are not conclusive....an increase in probability does not need to be 100% to be considered worthy of further study or to have merit. Much research is taken into account, and acted upon, that does not show 100% guaranteed results one way or another....and much of that is often based on fewer participants. This is partly why there are recommendations and not directives in many areas of health care.
Once again, I did not say these are definite ways, only that some feel they might be a way of increasing the odds...however small that increase may or may not be. I am merely providing current information that is available for others to investigate and decide what they will or won't do with it. Whether someone agrees with the information or not is up to them, but providing that information is what helps others make truly informed decisions.