At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them
answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in
answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you
will be able to:
Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+
topics.
As a Texas conservative, I'm seriously thinking about going to the Dem primary and voting for Hillary. Reasons: 1. Obama scares me. He reads those teleprompters so beautifully and empty heads swoon. (Wonder who writes those speeches?) He seems to be running for president of the world. 2. If Texas goes for Hillary, she might stand a prayer, otherwise, she's done. 3. Hillary would be easier for McCain to beat. I don't really like him either, but our options are limited. What do you think?
"McCain. I think his resurgence has shown security is still crucial to Americans and they will not accept surrender".........,
Surrender??? Do you mean withdrawing our forces from Iraq? That would not be surrender. It would be smart. Then we could concentrate on our BORDERS and keeping terrorists oput with the use of our military . After all they are supposed to defend US!!!!!
I am more sure than ever that we need to all get together and say we are NOT happy with ANY of the choices and come up with one of our own that actually is for the people and by the people. Now more than ever the candidates are all going to put us in a globalization thing that we are going to regret.
I have said for years that Bush had no intention of closing the border or getting rid of illegal aliens because he had an agenda for them to be here and it wasn't work....but an easier way to push for Big Brother and globalization.
Obama already is in on the globalization initiative bill they are trying to pass. Some people call it the Obama initiative. We are going to end up the same with any of them but with Hillary it will be disaster because she only wants power for herself and *the little guy* she is so invested in will find out he means NOTHING to her grand scheme of self grandiose.
Obama is scary because change can mean ANYTHING and I have a very sure feeling it isn't what we want or need.
McCain is SOMETHING to worry about because he is a wolf in a sheep costume that doesn't fit.
I am more sure than ever that we need to all get together and say we are NOT happy with ANY of the choices and come up with one of our own that actually is for the people and by the people. Now more than ever the candidates are all going to put us in a globalization thing that we are going to regret.
I have said for years that Bush had no intention of closing the border or getting rid of illegal aliens because he had an agenda for them to be here and it wasn't work....but an easier way to push for Big Brother and globalization.
Obama already is in on the globalization initiative bill they are trying to pass. Some people call it the Obama initiative. We are going to end up the same with any of them but with Hillary it will be disaster because she only wants power for herself and *the little guy* she is so invested in will find out he means NOTHING to her grand scheme of self grandiose.
Obama is scary because change can mean ANYTHING and I have a very sure feeling it isn't what we want or need.
McCain is SOMETHING to worry about because he is a wolf in a sheep costume that doesn't fit.
Third party candidates muck up elections; this is how we got Clinton, in my view. Participate, relax, and trust the American people, not in their attempt to elect panderers and vote buyers, but in determining good, effective leadership. Carter was elected; so what? He was ineffectual and replaced by the the most dynamic leader of our generation. It can happen again. In any event, I believe it is critical that we get leadership to change the course we are headed down: governmental bankruptcy because of the Great Society and its progeny. We need a Congress with the guts to confront the future. Kind of makes you want to bring back 'term limits'.
I know but what I am saying is we need to take the next few months to get people to realize that the choices are not an option we have to make it a nationwide thing and not let it be a third party but more of a take over type thing where everybody unanimously wants something other than these so called choices.
The government we have now is passing laws behind our back that is going to cause us great harm and no freedom within the next few years and then it may be too late to stand up against their corruptness.
They already say that approximately a third of the Republicans feel disenfranchised not having a decent candidate to vote for so they don't plan on voting as it is.
NOhelp4u says: "They already say that approximately a third of the Republicans feel disenfranchised not having a decent candidate to vote for so they don't plan on voting as it is." This observation is covered very well in the topic about whether one regrets having voted for President Bush. Party politics is a given and works; it is effective. The U.S. has historically embraced two party politics; it is 'tried and true'. It is very unsatisfying to look only at this election cycle or another as if it is the last great chance or opportunity. We are enjoying a process, not the 'end-all or be-all'.
the future will tell.
But everything I have ever said as far as the direction we are headed has always ended up happening and I am sure it is going to be a worse mess than ever within the next few years with anyone of these *choices* and worse yet if the Rhino McCain does end up next Pres whatever happens WILL be blamed on the Republicans worse than it already has been with Bush.
Bush will not be judged harshly, as he is in the mainstream media. I've been around awhile and quit watching TV news in 1970, including "60 Minutes", when it became obvious to anyone with half a brain that the media is pushing an agenda. Bush deserves much better and he will get it, and live to enjoy it; just watch, or read, or listen.
Sorry George, that's just not the case. He has already indeed been judged harshly anywhere that people congregate, it has nothing to do with the kind of media it is. Of course he will enjoy the rest of his life as he is flush with money, his stock portfolio has risen considerably while he's been in office - weird coincidence that.
I don’t care which one becomes President; so long as they get back to the war on terrorism that Bush has never started. I think that that is a question that should be put to each of them.
Linear Mode
