Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
Answer   ||    Advanced Search

Ask your question or search...
International Sites: Nederlandse experts vragen
User Name 
Password 
Join   Forgot password? 

Home > Society & Culture > Politics   »   Run, Cindy, Run

Question
 
 
#1  
Old Jul 9, 2007, 09:35 AM
speechlesstx's Avatar
speechlesstx
Ultra Member
speechlesstx is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 1,096
speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Run, Cindy, Run

Fresh off her retirement from the antiwar movement a month and a half ago, Cindy Sheehan is not only embarking on a caravan and "walking tour" to Washington DC, she is threatening to run against Madame Pelosi if she "does not file articles of impeachment against Mr. Bush by July 23."

All I can say is run, Cindy, run. Wouldn't that add some fun to the elections?

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Jul 9, 2007, 09:47 AM   #2  
Ultra Member
Dark_crow is offline
 
Dark_crow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: La Playa
Posts: 1,406
Dark_crow See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Dark_crow See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
Fresh off her retirement from the antiwar movement a month and a half ago, Cindy Sheehan is not only embarking on a caravan and "walking tour" to Washington DC, she is threatening to run against Madame Pelosi if she "does not file articles of impeachment against Mr. Bush by July 23."

All I can say is run, Cindy, run. Wouldn't that add some fun to the elections?
Another case of symbolism over substance; more to my liking would be for Cindy to run against Madam…

The whole problem with Cindy Sheehan is that she is not a true anti-war advocate; she is a selfish self-centered mother who lacks a drop of Patriotic blood.

Comments on this post
speechlesstx agrees: I agree with your assessment, and would add delusional.
ETWolverine agrees: Yes she is.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 9, 2007, 09:51 AM   #3  
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
tomder55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,684
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Shades of Ned Lamont .......who to vote for ; a real conundrum for a moonbat

I am tempted to send her a campaign contribution .Last I heard she was pleading poverty. Maybe the Goracle can slip her some of the proceeds from the successful Live Earth concerts . Then there's always Hugo .......

  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 9, 2007, 10:08 AM   #4  
Ultra Member
speechlesstx is offline
 
speechlesstx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 1,096
speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
Shades of Ned Lamont .......who to vote for ; a real conundrum for a moonbat

I am tempted to send her a campaign contribution .Last I heard she was pleading poverty. Maybe the Goracle can slip her some of the proceeds from the successful Live Earth concerts . Then there's always Hugo .......
You know, I just might contribute to her campaign myself. Someone has already come up with her campaign theme...
Attached Images
 
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 9, 2007, 11:25 AM   #5  
Senior Member
ETWolverine is offline
 
ETWolverine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 934
ETWolverine See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ETWolverine See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ETWolverine See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Oh, G-d, what a choice. Stretch Pelosi and Tin-foil Sheehan. I wonder if the election will end up being about which one is uglier or which one is dumber.

Neither one of them exactly looks good on camera. Instead of the big networks vieing for interviews with these two, they would fight over who got stuck with which one... and which sucker was stuck doing the interviews.

I think that Sheehan has a slight edge in vocal annoyingness, but Stretch Pelosi has the edge in grandmotherly smothering and inane, meaningless insights. It should be a pretty good election battle.

Elliot

Comments on this post
speechlesstx agrees: Well maybe CBS will have at least found a use for Katie Couric.
  Reply With Quote
 
     

Your Answer
Email me when someone replies to my answer
Join Login



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Ask your question or search...



Similar Threads
anyone run 5k?
(3 replies)
Will this run?
(4 replies)
iTunes won't run
(0 replies)
Run, Hillary, Run!
(2 replies)
It won't run.
(1 replies)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Search this Thread

Advanced Search

Bookmarks





Copyright ©2003 - 2009, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:55 PM.