Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
Ask    ||    Answer
 
Advanced  
 

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Society & Culture > Politics   »   The Republican connection?

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Question
 
 
#1  
Old Jul 5, 2008, 03:36 PM
BABRAM's Avatar
BABRAM
Senior Member
BABRAM is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 564
BABRAM See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.BABRAM See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
The Republican connection?


Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Jul 5, 2008, 03:46 PM   #2  
Ultra Member
progunr is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 1,973
progunr See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.progunr See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.progunr See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I've seen that quote several times, are you trying to make a point?

If so, why not make your point, instead of just posting something old to read?

The article itself even states that this tactic can be used by ANY political party, so again,
what is the point?
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 5, 2008, 04:17 PM   #3  
Senior Member
BABRAM is offline
 
BABRAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 564
BABRAM See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.BABRAM See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
snopes.com: Hermann Goering


Oh?! But I see you got the point. It just took you three sentences of dancing to get there, but you did. You acknowledged subject matter and reference, "this tactic could be used by ANY political party." So why does the Republican party choose this tactic, when the Democrats for all their faults choose not??? That old flimsy transparent patriotism card. The Republicans have worn it out.

BTW you thought this was not old??? You said,"Socialists, Communists, Marxists, Fascists, or any other term you want to use with the same basic meaning, is EXACTLY what the Democratic Party is all about." Please! That rhetoric is so stale Ronald Reagan knew it was outdated during his campaigns. Both parties have been slinging terms like these at each other for decades.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 6, 2008, 06:23 AM   #4  
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
tomder55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,682
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
yeah obviously that was the way Churchill and Roosevelt fooled their nations into war.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 6, 2008, 07:42 AM   #5  
Full Member
Gregisteredtrademark is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 219
Gregisteredtrademark See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
This theory works not only for war but for just about anything. Substitute a different word for War and it still works. I personally liked "Mad Cow Disease".
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 6, 2008, 07:46 AM   #6  
Über Member
NeedKarma is offline
 
NeedKarma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Online
Posts: 7,597
NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 6, 2008, 08:02 AM   #7  
Full Member
Gregisteredtrademark is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 219
Gregisteredtrademark See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BABRAM
The is obviously a very narrow view out there by some people. Babram claims that "So why does the Republican party choose this tactic, when the Democrats for all their faults choose not???" Do you not realize that it was the Democrats that got us involved in most of the wars in this great countries history. LBJ - Vietnam (Democrat), Truman - Korean War (Democrat), FDR - WWII (Democrat), Wilson - WWI (Democrat). Before slinging blanket statements we should be sure to weigh the facts of history.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 6, 2008, 02:53 PM   #8  
Senior Member
BABRAM is offline
 
BABRAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 564
BABRAM See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.BABRAM See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregisteredtrademark
Do you not realize that it was the Democrats that got us involved in most of the wars in this great countries history. LBJ - Vietnam (Democrat), Truman - Korean War (Democrat), FDR - WWII (Democrat), Wilson - WWI (Democrat). Before slinging blanket statements we should be sure to weigh the facts of history.

Huh?! Two things going on here. Actually I said, "Both parties have been slinging terms like these at each other for decades." I should had said the Democrats used to bombard Ronald Reagan, as the Republicans are currently attempting to do with Barack Obama. Yes, I take responsibility for this needed clarification. But did you think that LBJ, Truman, FDR, and Wilson are candidates for the upcoming presidency?! They are all dead, it's 2008, and Dubya's current personal project, otherwise known as the Iraqi war, is a costly disaster. Let's learn from the past, but not live in it. Number two, which is the relative subject of today and point, generally speaking though Democrats do not directly require Republicans patriotism credentials, but Republicans have made calling out Democrats patriotism tantamount to their campaign agenda the past decade. I'm not wearing my American flag lapel pin. Whoop-tee-do! BTW it's not a narrow view, it originated with Caesar and it works to damn well. That nazi "Hermann Goering" was speaking directly about making the masses persuaded to war, not made cow disease. Please.

PS. I'm a registered Indendepent that's voting for Obama.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 6, 2008, 03:05 PM   #9  
Senior Member
BABRAM is offline
 
BABRAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 564
BABRAM See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.BABRAM See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Tom, nobody with an IQ above room temperature would confuse George "Dubya" Bush for Churchill or Roosevelt.

Comments on this post
tomder55 agrees: I don't agree but that is besides the point. Both leaders were very effective in rallying reluctant populations to go to war . Both leaders efforts began long before their countries participated in armed conflict.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 6, 2008, 04:09 PM   #10  
Full Member
Gregisteredtrademark is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 219
Gregisteredtrademark See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Ok so let me get this straight. You mock me by saying that LBJ, Truman, FDR, and Wilson are dead an not a candidate for president. But in the same breath you speak of George Bush? Knock Knock... Bush isn't on the ballet either, or did you miss that one?

I can't stand it when children whine and I can't' stand it anymore when adults whine. What Bush has done is going to be his legacy and Americas issue to deal with for many years to come. I will flat out agree that Bush is an idiot and that he wanted to finish daddy's war, but the question is where do we go from here?

I just don't get how you can say that one candidates patriotism doesn't matter? And it is not about the pin, the pin is just one piece of a pattern that has been forming for years. Let's see his pastor of how many years? 20+ spewing "god dXXn America" are you going to tell me this was an isolated incident? No, he has been listening to this anti-American banter for years and never opposed it until it started to make him look bad.
  Reply With Quote
 
     

Your Answer
Email me when someone replies to my answer
Join Login





Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Similar Threads
Republican Delegate Count
(0 replies)
What about the Republican debate on ABC in New Hampshire?
(8 replies)
The Republican campaign
(55 replies)
democratic or republican
(2 replies)
democrat/republican who?
(5 replies)

Search this Thread

Advanced Search

Bookmarks

Sponsors



Copyright ©2003 - 2009, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:19 AM.