What and how can we do somethiing, very innovative, sensible, diplomatic and politically correct, to eradicate terrorism from all across the world ?

excon

Hello A:

That's like asking how we can eliminate body odor from the world. It's a nice idea - but it ain't gonna happen.

Let's say we convince 99.9999999% of the world NOT to blow themselves up. That still leaves 1,000's of people who didn't listen.

excon

Fr_Chuck

Will agree, first you assume with that, when terrorists operte they do so in a sane and politically correct method.

Even politically incorrect there is no way to eradicate terroism, with extreme military force ( like Saddam used) one can make it harder, since anyone even looking like one would be killed. But as long as one crazy person is willing to die for something, terroism will never end

cal823

you cant defeat terrorism
its not like theres one big country called "terrorism" that you can invade, destroy its military, and plant a flag in its capital.
terrorism is enacted by many different nations, groups of people, beliefs, its not just muslims, environmental groups also commit terrorism.
as long as their are people willing to die for their beliefs, terrorism is a threat.
and the day people are not willing to die for their beliefs, is a very, very sad world.

ordinaryguy

The Dalai Lama has some thoughts on the question.

ETWolverine

There is no answer to your question, because in many ways the question is contradictory.

A sensible solution is not likely to be very politically correct, and a politically correct solution won't be very sensible.

Diplomatic solutions will not erradicate terrorism, and any attempt to erradicate terrorism cannot be diplomatic.

Innovative solutions have been tried and failed.

There is a sensible way to stop terrorism, but it isn't politically correct or diplomatic. And it won't erradicate terrorism. It will merely limit it.

So there is no such solution to terrorism as the one you describe in your question.

If you are interested in a solution to terrorism that is NOT politically correct or diplomatic, or even particularly innovative, but is sensible, let me know.

Elliot

Dark_crow

As it turns out it appears we are doing just fine doing what we are now doing; Iraqi cemetery workers have fallen on hard times as the volume of killing in Iraq has plummeted. In Fallujah of all places enlisted marines have complained "There's nobody to shoot here, sir. If it's just going to be building schools and hospitals, that's what the Army is for, isn't it?" Meanwhile, Osama bin Laden has released a new tape which, rather than boasting about al-Qaeda's impending victory over the US in Iraq, instead admits to mistakes and makes a plea for unity among the insurgents. Inroads are being made in Pakistan with Bhutto back in the country, since she is using her new political role to attack "closet supporters of militants and Al Qaeda" within Musharraf's government, and even in Iran: “The spirit of freedom is stirring in Iran,” [Cheney] said, adding, “America looks forward to the day when Iranians reclaim their destiny, the day that our two countries, as free and democratic nations, can be the closest of friends.”

N0help4u

Just like the environmentalists don't want the dead brush to be cleared out of the forest and then we have the fires like California is going through now. We have the same problem with terrorism we are not allowed to 'profile' potential danger so just like the MRSA multiplies same with terrorism.

inthebox

I will give you an idealistic way :

When people can agree to disagree, and it goes no further.

When people see things as us and what we have in common rather than them and how different they are.

When people go beyond themselves and think of the needs of others, rather than wanting more for themselves at the expense of others.

Simple, really.

Now how do we get the terrorists to agree?






Grace and Peace

Skell

Destroy the world!

Is that innovative, sensible, diplomatic and politically correct?