Question
 | |  | | | 
Aug 13, 2007, 06:44 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 69
| | | population growth let's stop blaming climate change and address the real issue, population growth. Population growth, not global warming is at the root of our present problems. Windmills and solar power stations will not do anything to stop population growth. China is now the leading emitter but says we must be allowed to equal the per capita emissions of the developed countries. The Earth is straining under the ever increasing population and consumption of resources, which in itself causes pollution and unsustainable conditions. The human race does not have the right to produce and reproduce without suffering the consequences of famine and population displacement. Either these populations are allowed to relocate or they are forced to die out. It's time to put the resources into seriously curbing population growth, this is the only way that emissions and global warmng can be truely addressed, less consumption means less emmissions. Less people means less consumption | | | | | | |
Answers
 | |  | | |
Aug 13, 2007, 07:26 PM
|
#2
| | Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: CA, USA
Posts: 262
| Very good point but both of the problems need to be addressed in parallel. |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Aug 13, 2007, 07:35 PM
|
#3
| | Ultra Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,927
| Do you have any ideas about how to stem population growth??
I dont but id be interested to hear what ideas people have. |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Aug 13, 2007, 09:48 PM
|
#4
| | Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: CA, USA
Posts: 262
| IMO, the best way to control population growth is to improve living standard and social programs. Extreme population growth seems to be rampant in developing countries - Africa, India. Birthrate in wealthier countries are below 2, meaning population is in decline, assuming that life expectancy remains the same.
Another way to control population growth is stop the advance medical science ... just kidding. |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Aug 14, 2007, 01:17 AM
|
#5
| | Ultra Member
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: New York
Posts: 1,520
| Quote: |
According to figures released earlier this year by the UN, global birth rates fell to the lowest level in recorded history with the average woman in the developing world having 2.9 children, down from an average of nearly 6 babies in the 1970s. UN demographers also predict that fertility in most of the developing world will fall below the replacement level (2.1 children per woman) before the end of the 21st century.
| World population growth rate continues to plummet
Ok but environmentalists want us to go draconian on this issue so any volunteers ? |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Aug 14, 2007, 06:46 AM
|
#6
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: New Jersey
Posts: 897
| The solution to population growth and overpopulation is simple:
Marry only ugly people.
Elliot |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Aug 14, 2007, 07:06 AM
|
#7
| | Ultra Member
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: La Playa
Posts: 1,406
| Quote: | Originally Posted by paraclete let's stop blaming climate change and address the real issue, population growth. Population growth, not global warming is at the root of our present problems. Windmills and solar power stations will not do anything to stop population growth. China is now the leading emitter but says we must be allowed to equal the per capita emissions of the developed countries. The Earth is straining under the ever increasing population and consumption of resources, which in itself causes pollution and unsustainable conditions. The human race does not have the right to produce and reproduce without suffering the consequences of famine and population displacement. Either these populations are allowed to relocate or they are forced to die out. It's time to put the resources into seriously curbing population growth, this is the only way that emissions and global warmng can be truely addressed, less consumption means less emmissions. Less people means less consumption |
Yes, population growth is the main cause of migration, and [that] the main cause of border changes. Alias, we caught-up in a system that cannot be changed except at the cost of freedom. |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Aug 14, 2007, 08:20 AM
|
#8
| | Ultra Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 1,044
| Quote: | Originally Posted by tomder55 |
It's only fair that those who advocate these draconian measures be the first to volunteer. Maybe the good folks at the Worldwatch Institute would offer themselves as an example? |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Aug 14, 2007, 08:37 AM
|
#9
| | Ultra Member
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: USA
Posts: 1,254
| The family plan in China is working well, but the base of the population is so high which makes the whole population keep going up. ( with a smaller acceleration  ) |
| | | | | | | | Question Tools | Search this Question | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |