Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
  Advanced
Register  |  Log in  
   Ask    
 Answer  
  Help  

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Society & Culture > Politics   »   Our lame Supreme Court finally got one right!

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Question
 
 
Old Jun 26, 2008, 07:19 AM
progunr
Ultra Member
progunr is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 1,949
progunr See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.progunr See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.progunr See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Our lame Supreme Court finally got one right!

Finally!

A just decision by the Supreme Court.

The right to keep and bear arms, is an individual right, without regard to any type of membership in any militia.

What say you gun grabbers now?

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Jun 27, 2008, 12:49 PM   #31  
Full Member
Sonador101 is offline
 
Sonador101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nevada
Posts: 299
Sonador101 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
look scottgem,
ok maybe they wouldn't care if people had a gun, BUT they would be stopped befor ethey got away. plus most of them will think twice cause they just want to have fun, but its not fun if you get caught.
yes admittedly the crazy ones will still do it and won't care but like i said before we civillians can stop them, and i do believe that those car jackers would stop if a gun was ponited at there head. thus it would deteer the outcome.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 27, 2008, 12:54 PM   #32  
Full Member
Sonador101 is offline
 
Sonador101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nevada
Posts: 299
Sonador101 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
ok say you were a ciminal, if you knew no one had anyguns and you want to like i don't know, preform armed robbery, you'd do it cause you knew youi wouldn't get caught, and no one could hurt yoiu.
IF you knew there was a high probablility that they were armed would you stll do it? because you could probably get killed, or hurt, and thrown jail.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 27, 2008, 12:54 PM   #33  
Ultra Member
progunr is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 1,949
progunr See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.progunr See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.progunr See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
For ScottGem,

I didn't have any statistics immediately available, I was not ignoring that request.

Here is some stuff for you to look at, if you want. Given enough time, I could produce more information on this topic, than most of us could read in one day.

Myth: Concealed carry laws increase crime
Fact: Forty states1, comprising the majority of the American population, are "right-to-carry"
states. Statistics show that in these states the crime rate fell
(or did not rise) after the right-to carry
law became active (as of July, 2006). Nine states deny or restrict the right to carry.
Fact: Crime rates involving gun owners with carry permits have consistently been about 0.02%
of all carry permit holders since Florida’s right-to-carry law started in 1988.
Fact: After passing their concealed carry law, Florida's homicide rate fell from 36% above the
national average to 4% below, and remains it below the national average (as of the last reporting
period, 2005).
Fact: The serious crime rate in Texas fell 50% faster than the national average after Texas
passed a concealed carry law in 1995.
Fact: When citizens are allowed to carry concealed weapons:
• Murder rates drop 8%
• Rape rates fall 5%
• Aggravated assaults drop 7%
Fact: More to the point, crime is significantly higher in states without right-to-carry laws
Fact: States that disallow concealed carry have violent crime rates 11% higher than national
averages.
Fact: Deaths and injuries from mass
public shootings fall dramatically after
right-to-carry concealed handgun laws
are enacted. Between 1977 and 1995, the
average death rate from mass shootings
plummeted by up to 91% after such laws
went into effect, and injuries dropped by
over 80%.

Myth: People with concealed weapons permits will commit
crimes
Fact: The results for the first
30 states that passed “shallissue”
laws for concealed carry
permits are similar. Here are
some specific cases:
Fact: People with concealed
carry permits are:
• 5.7 times less likely to be arrested for violent offenses than the general public
• 13.5 times less likely to be arrested for non-violent offenses than the general public
Fact: In Texas, citizens with concealed carry permits are 14 times less likely to commit a crime.
They are also five times less likely to commit a violent crime.
Fact: Even gun control organizations agree it is a non-problem, as in Texas – “because there
haven't been Wild West shootouts in the streets”.
Fact: Of 14,000 CCW licensees in Oregon, only 4 (0.03%) were convicted of the criminal (not
necessarily violent) use or possession of a firearm.
Fact: In Florida, a state that has allowed concealed carry since late 1987, you are twice as likely
to be attacked by an alligator as by a person with a concealed carry permit.
Myth: CCWs will lead to mass public shootings
Fact: Multiple victim public
shootings drop in states that
pass shall-issue CCW
legislation.
Myth: People do
not need
concealable
weapons
Fact: In 80% of gun
defenses, the defender used a
concealable handgun. A
quarter of the gun defenses
occurred in places away from
the defender's home.18
Fact: 77% of all violent crime occurs in public places.19 This makes concealed carry necessary
for almost all self-defense needs. But due to onerous laws forbidding concealed carry, only
26.8% of defensive gun uses occurred away from home.20
Fact: Often, small weapons that are capable of being concealed are the only ones usable by
people of small stature or with physical disabilities.
Fact: The average citizen doesn’t need a Sport Utility Vehicle, but driving one is arguably safer
than driving other vehicles. Similarly, carrying a concealable gun makes the owner – and his or
her community – safer by providing protection not otherwise available.
Myth: Police are against concealed carrying by citizens
Fact: 66% of police chiefs believe that citizens carrying concealed firearms reduce rates of
violent crime.
Fact: “All the horror stories I thought would come to pass didn’t happen ...I think it’s worked
out well, and that says good things about the citizens who have permits. I’m a convert.”
Fact: “I ... [felt] that such legislation present[ed] a clear and present danger to law-abiding
citizens by placing more handguns on our streets. Boy was I wrong. Our experience in Harris
County, and indeed statewide, has proven my fears absolutely groundless”.
Fact: Explain this to the Law Enforcement Alliance of America, Second Amendment Police
Department, and Law Enforcement for the Preservation of the Second Amendment, all of whom
support shall-issue concealed carry laws.

* 4 months ago

Source(s):
http://www.gunfacts.info/pd...
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 27, 2008, 01:38 PM   #34  
Expert
excon is offline
 
excon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: On the outside
Posts: 9,191
excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Hello Scott:

I actually think criminals DO care if they get shot.

Let's say there was a block of houses that had no signs in their yards. In the next block over, they had signs saying they have burglar alarms installed. The next block has signs saying they have firearms in their homes.

Which ones do you think will get broken into more often?

excon
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 27, 2008, 04:01 PM   #35  
Computer Expert
ScottGem is offline
 
ScottGem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: LI, NY - USA
Posts: 25,180
ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ScottGem See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Pay to call ScottGem for advice ($.75/min)
Call ScottGem via Skype™
First to Progunr,
I couldn't get to that link, but it appears to be a pro-gun site so I suspect their viewpoint and statisitics are slightly skewed. I find the "myths" it cites show this since I never even considered most them.

I notice no statisitcs about how many innocents are hurt in these situations.

To sonador (and excon)
People commit crimes for three reasons:
1) Desperation
2) The rush (high) of committing a crime
3) Opportunity/temptation

A person who is desperate is really not going to consider the dangers of what they are doing. If they did they wouldn't be that desparate.

Someone committing a crime because of the rush or high it gives them is also not going to worry about the dangers. Just the opposite, the danger is part of what makes them commit crimes.

And the person who commits a crime of opportunity just doesn't think, they act on impulse.

So it just not logical to think the possibility of getting into a gun battle is going deter a real criminal.

The fact is that there is high probability that, if you commit a crime you will be caught, whether because of a gun toting civilan or police action. Yet that doesn't seem to deter people bent on committing crimes. You are thinking like an honest person and criminals don't think that way.

The fact of the matter is most people are not trained to deal with a gun battle. In fact the criminal is often more trained then the civilian. So the greater likelihood is that the civilian or an innocent bystander gets hurt.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 27, 2008, 04:15 PM   #36  
Full Member
westnlas is offline
 
westnlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 322
westnlas See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I get a big laugh out of gun owners who suddenly feel they are protected by having guns in their home. Very few actually have ever used a gun to kill someone with and very few even use guns for hunting. It's kind of like owning a pit bull as a means to tell everyone how macho they are. Certainly we do not need guns to protect us from invasion or social unrest. I mean how many in this country are actually affected by the riots in LA or Chicago. Oh the gang bangers have guns but should they ? Heck, even gun enthusiasts such as Cheney can't handle them safely. I don't keep any registered firearms, and am quite comfortable with the weapons I have to defend me from any outside threat. The scariest person I have ever encountered here, was a frightened young pint sized cop making his very first traffic stop. I was afraid I might need to disarm him to keep him from hurting someone by accident.

I don't believe that the military could ever get a consensus of troops that would take over this country by force. For every radical group, there is one just as radical that opposes their views. In order to combat crime, we must either require EVERY person to be armed at all times, or take guns away from people who have no business with them. It's coming time to grow up in this country and start acting like the civilized nation we purport ourselves to be.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 27, 2008, 04:26 PM   #37  
Full Member
Sonador101 is offline
 
Sonador101's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nevada
Posts: 299
Sonador101 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
ok scott,
look yeah SOME criminals won't care. but they'll hurt people, and the fact that they don't care makes them that more dangerous. and wheather or not they care doesn't matter, when a crazy person is trying to kill you or someone else i want to be able to defend myself, and when i get a gun i will learn how to use it responibly, and i will get training in it. in my oppinion when theres someone shooting i don't want to wait for the police to come, while he kills more innocent people. we want to stop them BEFORE they hurt ANYONE, but calling the police takes time, and it takes time for them to come. the time the criminal needs to get away. and most most criminals care, some do it for a high, but seriouly who cares? i want to stop them, to keep them from hurting people. i want to defend myself, go look up the statistics, go do whatever. but the fact is we have the right. the right our forefathers gave us, and it would be disrespectful to take it away,thats telling them they made a mistake, when in truth they put it there so it couldn't be taken away, and it shouldn't.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 27, 2008, 04:38 PM   #38  
Christianity Expert
Fr_Chuck is offline
 
Fr_Chuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 27,671
Fr_Chuck has disabled reputation
Well I will say that it has been showned time and time again those with carrry permits do not do crimes with thier guns and have not had any problems with thier proper use. And the issue about young police officer I would say is sorta hard to believe since first a police officer goes though months of training, alot of it with thier weapon and alot of practice in when and how to use it. Also they will spend several months with a training officer in the field before they are ever on thier own.

And as a former police officer the most dangerous thing most police officers do is a traffic stop, Most officers who are hurt in the line of duty are done so doing a traffic stop. Two of my best freinds who I went though the GA state academy with have been killed in the past 7 years doing traffic stops and I have already been to two other funerals from officers doing traffic stops. During one traffic stop I had my car rammed by the other car and 4 men with guns decide they did not agree with the traffic stop.

I have shot at a person before, and have pulled my weapon numberous times and have to point it in making several felony arrests.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 27, 2008, 06:04 PM   #39  
Ultra Member
magprob is offline
 
magprob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,770
magprob See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.magprob See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.magprob See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I wanna live here.

YouTube - WESTWORLD TRAILER YUL BRYNNER
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 27, 2008, 06:16 PM   #40  
Full Member
westnlas is offline
 
westnlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 322
westnlas See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I carried, slept with, cleaned, ate with, bathed with, and yes used many weapons for a period of time. I was fortunate in acquiring insight that I cannot explain that told me when danger was near. Unfortunately, small people tend to have less mettle than large ones. Nervous people with weapons make me very agitated. Police do shoot people here in Las Vegas and many police officers do become involved in confrontations. Recently a woman was killed by a Henderson Officer under questionable circumstances. He was the only one of several officers present that did fire. As I stated before, even those who are supposedly expert mishandle weapons routinely. I am much more comfortable when the guns are on the ground, and I've personally cleared them. In training we were told that it's not the bullet that has your name on it that you worry about. It's the one marked "To whom it may concern".

Last year, a rookie officer of Las Vegas Metro, went wiggy and started shooting at passing people, he was killed by other police officers. All the training in the world doesn't mean the guy with the gun is sane or normal. In fact, I believe people that want to carry a gun are a bit "off" in the first place.
  Reply With Quote
 
     


Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors

Similar Threads
Question Asker Forum Answers Last Post
texas supreme court and court of criminals red22911 Government 1 Jun 8, 2008 01:53 PM
handguns is finally going to the Supreme Court. Dark_crow Current Events 21 Dec 7, 2007 08:46 AM
Supreme Court maria carmen Social Studies 1 May 29, 2007 09:30 PM
Superior Court and Supreme Court Want2Know Other Law 4 Jan 29, 2007 10:17 AM
Supreme Court jm160195 History Education 1 Apr 29, 2005 02:07 PM




Copyright ©2003 - 2007, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:23 AM.