Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
Ask    ||    Answer
 
  Advanced  
 

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Society & Culture > Politics   »   Immigration - USA or CANADA

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Question
 
 
Old Jul 2, 2008, 11:56 AM
purplewings's Avatar
purplewings
Junior Member
purplewings is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 145
purplewings See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Send a message via Yahoo to purplewings
Immigration - USA or CANADA

Does anyone know, or have a good idea of what the USA will gain from giving amnesty to illegals and opening the door to major future immigration from Mexico? There definitely has to be more than just 'cheaper labor to help the farmers'. I'm wondering if there are some negotiations that might relate to the drugs that come through our borders from both Mexico and South America. Or if amnesty somehow figures into the $3.5 billion credit line being negotiated by the US to help Mexico clean up it's $104 billion debt.

Since the USA population is now in excess of 304 million people and Canada has a mere 33+ million people, why aren't the immigrants being directed there where so much unpopulated land is standing?

**********
Check out this article stating that the way things are looking right now, and by 2050 our population will have soared to 438 million, creating complete havoc.

U.S. Population Grows Due to Immigration as Infrastructure Weakens
"This does not even address the profound national issues of "borders, language and culture" that will be affected by new waves of mass immigration. 438 million? That number is just too many to allow any sort of society to function on half a continent, mostly near the coastlines. But one could also focus on the "depletion" of the traditional American concepts of national boundaries, or the decline of the nation's common English language and some semblance of an "American" culture based on a shared history. No, if you focus on that kind of thing, people will think that you are talking about immigration in terms of race.

So better just to focus on the fact that an increased U.S. population � from whatever source � will lead to massive shortages of food, water and energy. And the public infrastructure will simply break down. Vast swaths of the country will become unrecognizable slums filled with broken-down housing, bad transportation, and hungry and thirsty people living on the squalid edge of human survival.

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Jul 4, 2008, 12:42 PM   #11  
Ultra Member
Choux is offline
 
Choux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: ChicagoLand
Posts: 3,054
Choux See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Choux See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Choux See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Choux See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
The situation of millions of illegal immigrants in America is a *big problem*...and big problems have to be addressed, not ignored. Bush in his 8 years as President did nothing to address this terrible problem. Why? Because his corporate friends want illegal immigrants in our country!! McCain, er McBush, supported a bill for amnesty for illegals, but he changed his mind, flip flopped, to be in line with the corporates.

Having a *huge subclass* of Spanish speaking workers, unidentified, uninsured, not loyal, no vested interest in our country, some criminal elements, not good!...... I don't know this issue very well as I am more involved in the war issues and economic issues for the middle class....

Comments on this post
purplewings agrees: Hi Chou. You're right that Bush and McCain are in favor of amnesty for them, but so are Obama and Hillary, and much of Congress. That's why I wonder...
frangipanis agrees: as proponents of international human rights, it isn't a good look either
N0help4u agrees: I agree but I doubt the Dems would/will stop it either. (PS Dom would give you a disagree :) )
tomder55 agrees: I guess public negative reaction to shamnesty had nothing to do with McCain's decision to support border enforcement first. Either way shamnesty will be the law of the land next year.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 5, 2008, 05:58 AM   #12  
Senior Member
frangipanis is offline
 
frangipanis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 996
frangipanis See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by purplewings
In my state at this time, we are cutting back on government, have ended state medical assistance and closed many schools because we are almost bankrupt due to the auto factories closing or moving out of the country. Our unemployment is 8.5%. These people would all be available for temporary jobs that paid enough to make it worth the trip to get there

That's the trick. These people hiring immigrants are paying them a wage that is unliveable. Once the immigrants become legal, they will want jobs that pay a living wage too. They accept the extremely low wages because they aren't here legally. BTW, these are summer jobs, who supports the illegals in the winter?

If the state agencies functioned properly, those kind of jobs would be for able bodied citizens receiving state aid, instead of letting the public support them.

I'd also say that the rate our corporations are moving to other countries will curtail many of those 167 million jobs - but apparently it sounds like a good reason to go against the citizen's wishes.

I think our politicians have much more going on with all this immigration than they want us to know. Perhaps we need more military people? Whatever it is, I'm sure it will be to their benefit.
I hear your concerns. The problem being that if you paid redundant workers in Detroit to relocate to work in jobs Mexicans are willing to do at a fraction of the wages, farmers would not be able to compete with countries such as Brazil and entire markets would collapse. So it's a dilemma, with no easy fix.

By the way, while the US is our most important trading partner and not overly taken for granted, heavily subsidised onions produced in the US are dumped on our supermarket shelves under the banner of "free trade" to the detriment of Australian farmers.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 5, 2008, 01:06 PM   #13  
Ultra Member
Choux is offline
 
Choux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: ChicagoLand
Posts: 3,054
Choux See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Choux See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Choux See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Choux See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I guess I wasn't clear... It is mandatory for a nation to know who is in the country.....especially in such huge numbers. That is a dangerous situation...no allegiance, huge numbers, not English speakers, and so on......but, it takes guts to support legislation to facilitate knowing where these people are, such as roads to citizenship.

It takes guts because the uneducated American people want to simply hate these people and not do the right thing to protect our country.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 7, 2008, 07:55 AM   #14  
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
tomder55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,682
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Both candidates support shamnesty . It will be the law next year.

We are led to believe that Americans like Sapph will not do certain jobs and only the immigrants will do them. That is an insulting lie.

But if we are looking for good high paying American jobs that Americans will do then drill here ,drill now, refine here ,refine now.

Quote:
I guess I wasn't clear... It is mandatory for a nation to know who is in the country.....especially in such huge numbers. That is a dangerous situation...no allegiance, huge numbers, not English speakers, and so on......but, it takes guts to support legislation to facilitate knowing where these people are, such as roads to citizenship.
What it takes is a lack of spine by our elected leaders to enforce our laws . Supporting shamnesty takes no guts. It is the simplest way to get around the fact that we have permitted this unchecked illegal immigration for so long.

Comments on this post
purplewings agrees: Exactly. The politicians have neglected the issue and now are trying to save face by turning illegal into legal with a magic wand.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 7, 2008, 09:23 PM   #15  
Senior Member
inthebox is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 782
inthebox See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.inthebox See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by purplewings
Does anyone know, or have a good idea of what the USA will gain from giving amnesty to illegals and opening the door to major future immigration from Mexico? There definitely has to be more than just 'cheaper labor to help the farmers'. I'm wondering if there are some negotiations that might relate to the drugs that come through our borders from both Mexico and South America. Or if amnesty somehow figures into the $3.5 billion credit line being negotiated by the US to help Mexico clean up it's $104 billion debt.

Since the USA population is now in excess of 304 million people and Canada has a mere 33+ million people, why aren't the immigrants being directed there where so much unpopulated land is standing?

**********
Check out this article stating that the way things are looking right now, and by 2050 our population will have soared to 438 million, creating complete havoc.

U.S. Population Grows Due to Immigration as Infrastructure Weakens
"This does not even address the profound national issues of "borders, language and culture" that will be affected by new waves of mass immigration. 438 million? That number is just too many to allow any sort of society to function on half a continent, mostly near the coastlines. But one could also focus on the "depletion" of the traditional American concepts of national boundaries, or the decline of the nation's common English language and some semblance of an "American" culture based on a shared history. No, if you focus on that kind of thing, people will think that you are talking about immigration in terms of race.

So better just to focus on the fact that an increased U.S. population � from whatever source � will lead to massive shortages of food, water and energy. And the public infrastructure will simply break down. Vast swaths of the country will become unrecognizable slums filled with broken-down housing, bad transportation, and hungry and thirsty people living on the squalid edge of human survival.

What does the US have to gain?

Legalize them [ amnesty if you will ], after health and security screenings.
If you are a felon, you should get fingerprinted and deported.

Come on now people, what are we going to do? round up and deport > 10 million people?
Penalize small business owners because they don't have the where with all to accurately verify citizenship? Maybe corporations will have to actually pay a standard wage and thereby helping alll workers "legal or not."


Welcome them to be part of the American dream, where through hardwork and education, you have the possibility of advancing socioeconomically. Become a productive taxpaying member of society.

This competittion stimlates the "natives" to also work hard and not get complacent because they can trace their ancestry to the Mayflower. Competition is at the root of Capitalism, our culture, why exclude immmigrants?

Show the world our humanity by accepting them - is not what the US did with the Irish, Italian, German etc immigrations? Are we not better than the majority of the world, where tribalism and ethnic divisions lead to atrocities? [ Balkans, Africa, Middle East for example.

Learn Spanish / estudia Espanol. Most countrys have more than one language. It is a business opportunity to serve their needs. Integrate cultures like we already are and have done with other waves of immigration.

Learn the lesson of Europe and Muslim immigration. Immigrants can be a benefit if treated humanely and accepted rather than a discontented, disenfranchised, separate minority.

This is from a first generation American, whose father was a recruited professional in the early 1960s.

Comments on this post
tomder55 agrees: Europe will be the Dhimmi Republic of Europe in generation. http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2008/07/04/Judge_says_Sharia_aspects_OK_in_Britain/UPI-82501215173225/
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 7, 2008, 10:40 PM   #16  
Junior Member
purplewings is offline
 
purplewings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 145
purplewings See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Send a message via Yahoo to purplewings
Quote:
Show the world our humanity by accepting them - is not what the US did with the Irish, Italian, German etc immigrations? Are we not better than the majority of the world, where tribalism and ethnic divisions lead to atrocities? [ Balkans, Africa, Middle East for example.
Not to my knowledge. People have always had to go through a process to become a citizen. How can something be illegal and suddenly it's legal? There are thousands of people in other countries with their names on long waiting lists to come here, is it humane to ignore them in favor of those who came uninvited?

We have humanity, yes - but common sense tells us this is a mess and will create many more problems than it will bring good.

We are not excluding immigrants. I think America has done wonderfully with immigration, except in this case because they never really enforced the law.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 8, 2008, 02:31 AM   #17  
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
tomder55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,682
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I know all my ancestors were processed BEFORE they were admitted .
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 9, 2008, 08:24 AM   #18  
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
tomder55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,682
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Learn the lesson of Europe and Muslim immigration.
Native Dutch have been so inundated by the "Muslim immigration " that many are seeking to emigrate to a a more Euro-friendly nation .

More And More Dutch Leaving The Netherlands

Liberal Netherlands grows less so on immigration | csmonitor.com


Blonde Swedish women are dying their hair black to avoid the harassment and sexual abuse from Moslem men in their country.There is a reign of terror against Swedish women with an unprecedented increase in rapes.They are inventing now belts for themselves to give added protection against sexual assalt. They are even being assaulted at dance clubs with knives because the Muslim men object to their behavior.

» Muslim Rape Wave in Sweden The Logic Society

Many immigrants get an EU Visa in one country and then go on a European wide crime-wave.Then head back to their country of origin.
RussiaToday : Features : Norwegians battle Eastern Europe crooks
(note : due to fear and political correctness the article identifies the criminals as "Eastern European")

Simularily the Brits have gone out of their way to appease the "immigrants " . They report that it is a myth that there is an increase in crime as a result of this immigration.
But there has been an increase in violent crime ;especially knife wielding criminals that peaked as the wave of immigration did.
Mass immigration to blame for British crime spikes and knife culture « Aftermath News


The most recent example of Dhimminitude is the British judge who decided that British law should not reign supreme and instead Sharia law in some circumstances should replace the laws of the land.
Sharia law SHOULD be used in Britain, says UK's top judge | Mail Online
And there was a recent decision that was made that compels the police to outfit their dogs with " booties "before they enter Muslim homes.

These are lessons we in the States are learning all too well .
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 9, 2008, 12:30 PM   #19  
Junior Member
purplewings is offline
 
purplewings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 145
purplewings See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Send a message via Yahoo to purplewings
All who have opened their country to these immigrants are ready to leave and probably want to come here, but by then, we'll be in the same miserable situation and have no place to go. Aren't we supposed to learn from what we see?

With Obama as president, I believe we'll have even more immigrants coming in from Africa...many of them practicing Muslims. That should please everyone who sees no connection between Muslims and terrorism.

Comments on this post
NeedKarma disagrees: Obama is president = more immigrants from Africa? Oh my, your mindset is showing. Where there more irish immigrants when JFK was prez? Were they drunken fighting louts?
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 9, 2008, 02:16 PM   #20  
Über Member
NeedKarma is online now
 
NeedKarma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Online
Posts: 7,541
NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by purplewings
With Obama as president, I believe we'll have even more immigrants coming in from Africa
Why do you say that?
  Reply With Quote
 
     

Your Answer
Email me when someone replies to my answer
Join Login





Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Similar Threads
immigration fraud in Canada
(2 replies)
immigration canada - divorced
(0 replies)
Immigration to Canada, divorce after interview but before midicals.
(0 replies)
Immigration Law
(0 replies)
immigration fees for Australian immigration
(2 replies)

Search this Thread

Advanced Search

Bookmarks

Sponsors



Copyright ©2003 - 2009, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:07 PM.