Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
Answer   ||    Advanced Search

Ask your question or search...
International Sites: Nederlandse experts vragen
User Name 
Password 
Join   Forgot password? 

Home > Society & Culture > Politics   »   Hillary says she is progressive

Question
 
 
#1  
Old Oct 19, 2007, 09:34 AM
N0help4u's Avatar
N0help4u
Über Member
N0help4u is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: dark side of moon, Pa
Posts: 16,924
N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Send a message via Yahoo to N0help4u
Hillary says she is progressive

Progressivism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Glenn Beck says that is probably one of the most honest replies she (or any politician) has ever given.
What do you consider the pros and the cons of progressivism??????

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Oct 19, 2007, 09:59 AM   #2  
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
tomder55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,684
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Hillary is progressive in that progressives believe in statism and in state solutions . Glen Beck is correct because the term liberalism has been hijacked by them . She is a statist and has more than most pols. prefected her manipulation of the machines of power. All her policies would increase the power of the state .

Comments on this post
N0help4u agrees: she seems to deny being a liberal. Thanks :)
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Oct 19, 2007, 10:28 AM   #3  
Senior Member
ETWolverine is offline
 
ETWolverine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 934
ETWolverine See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ETWolverine See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ETWolverine See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Whatever you think it is supposed to mean, it actually means the exact opposite. That's the key to understanding liberal terminology.

Liberalism isn't liberal or liberating at all. It's main concepts are to limit the amount of money you can earn, the guns you can own, the foods you can eat, the places that you can smoke, the religions you can worship publicly, the decisions you can make for your children, the amount of fuel you can use, the amount of energy you can use, the amount of carbon dioxide you can produce, etc. What's liberating about that?

The same is true of everything the liberals give names to. Their "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" was neither comprehensive, nor did it actually reform anything.

"Universal Low Cost Health Care" will not be universal, will not be low-cost, and will not actually care for anyone's health.

"Campaign Finance Reform" did nothing to reform campaign finance except limit free speech and create "organizations" that do the campaign finance instead of the candidates themselves.

"Affirmative Action" is neither affirmative nor active in helping its target.

I could go on, but you get the idea.

The word "progressive" is another of those terms that mean the exact opposite of what you think. It doesn't actually bring any kind of progression of any sort. In fact, the entire liberal/progressive agenda is actually REGRESSIVE because it creates an entire underclass of people that are reliant on the government for their livelihoods. That is nothing less than feudalism at its core. Those on the "progressive" welfare programs for extended periods are no better than serfs who relied on the local baron to protect them from the ravages of life, and who's very existence was at the mercy of the baron. In what way is that a form of progress?

Elliot

Comments on this post
N0help4u agrees: Precisely! And Hillary is a prime example of words not meaning what they say!
speechlesstx agrees: Spot on, Elliot.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Oct 19, 2007, 11:04 AM   #4  
Ultra Member
Dark_crow is offline
 
Dark_crow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: La Playa
Posts: 1,406
Dark_crow See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Dark_crow See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
A work in progress rather than stagnation. Historically, the Democratic Party has supported organized labour, ethnic minorities, and progressive reform. It tends to favour greater government intervention in the economy and to oppose government intervention in the private, noneconomic affairs of citizens. …
  Reply With Quote
 
     

Your Answer
Email me when someone replies to my answer
Join Login



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Ask your question or search...



Similar Threads
Italian Progressive Rock song
(0 replies)
Hurting or Helping Hillary?
(17 replies)
Past Progressive
(2 replies)
Never, Ever Use Progressive!
(10 replies)
Progressive Insurance
(0 replies)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Search this Thread

Advanced Search

Bookmarks





Copyright ©2003 - 2009, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:44 PM.