Quote:
| Originally Posted by NeedKarma Funny that, when facts get in the way. 
But what do you do when somewhat pointely disagress with a post? They aren't posting their opinion, they are saying why you are wrong. Natural human reaction to set the person straight. |
Spread feature won't allow me to comment so I have to reply.
This bears on what I have been saying in this thread:
http://www.askmehelpdesk.com/forum-h...ing-26247.html
Fred disagreed with a statement I made, which is his right. In disagreeing, he presented some facts that he felt backed up his disagreement. So far so good. If those facts did disprove my statement, then my next move would be to recant. However, those facts did not disprove my statement. The facts did not consider other facts. So instead of recanting, I responded with facts that support my statement and show Fred's disagreement as incorrect.
All this was done, politely and within the guidelines.
The next move, should have been Fred's acknowledgement that my point was correct and recanting his disagreement. Instead he responds with an incorrect characterization of what he actually said. Fine! So that leaves me to respond by showing what he actually said and how it was incorrect.
Again, all this is done with civility, no name calling or apparent violations of rules.
But the point is that my statement was disagreed with, indicating I was wrong. the problem is I was not wrong, Fred was. So I should have the right to defend my position. Which is what I have done.