Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
Answer   ||    Advanced Search

Ask your question or search...
International Sites: Nederlandse experts vragen
User Name 
Password 
Join   Forgot password? 

Home > Society & Culture > Politics   »   Farenheit 911

Question
 
 
#1  
Old Apr 18, 2006, 02:29 PM
Cgirl's Avatar
Cgirl
Full Member
Cgirl is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Midwesterner, USA
Posts: 287
Cgirl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Send a message via AIM to Cgirl
Farenheit 911

I know this movie came out a while ago, and a lot has changed since then, but I feel Michael Moore is "right on target" with this movie when it comes to Bush's policies. Here is a link about it for those who have never seen it: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0361596/

What does everyone else think?

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Apr 18, 2006, 02:47 PM   #2  
Über Member
NeedKarma is offline
 
NeedKarma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Online
Posts: 7,603
NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
In case you haven't seen it, here's another one of those movies that dares asks questions about 9/11:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...change&pl=true

Comments on this post
N0help4u agrees: your link didn't work :(
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 18, 2006, 02:48 PM   #3  
Über Member
RickJ is offline
 
RickJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Bogs at Windover
Posts: 7,363
RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I think the biggest problem with this is blaming this on one person. It was agreed upon by Congress.

Yes, it was a HORRIBLE and STUPID decision to go into Iraq...but the blame cannot be on the one person who proposed it or pushed it, but on the many - on BOTH sides - who agreed.

Comments on this post
N0help4u agrees: Precisely! It IS definitely bi partisan when it comes to the *conspiracy theory stuff* /& some true some N0T
startover22 agrees: It takes many people to make the call.....I agree we cannot blame just one person.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 18, 2006, 02:58 PM   #4  
Full Member
Cgirl is offline
 
Cgirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Midwesterner, USA
Posts: 287
Cgirl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Send a message via AIM to Cgirl
I have not seen that one yet, NeedKarma, but plan to.
I do agree RickJ that there is more to blame for this than just one person, there was a lot of people involved in it. I think this movie was just focusing on one person because he is SUPPOSED to be the leader of our country, and he represents us badly as a nation.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 18, 2006, 03:12 PM   #5  
Über Member
RickJ is offline
 
RickJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Bogs at Windover
Posts: 7,363
RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Agreed...but look at all the anti-Bush sentiment this movie generated for no good reason.

If MM were truly eager to show the truth, he'd be bashing ALL the jokers who went along with the "let's go into Iraq" plan.

...but no, he would have us thinking the one who "disagreed after he agreed" would have lead our country better.

Despite that I think Bush has SCREWED UP BIG TIME, if I had to vote again, I'd still have to vote for him. Kerry is a waffling weasle that cannot be trusted as far as you can throw him.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 18, 2006, 03:14 PM   #6  
Über Member
RickJ is offline
 
RickJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Bogs at Windover
Posts: 7,363
RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
...please pardon this digression from my typical even tone, but this whole subject just burns me up. I'm ready to outlaw political parties altogether and go back to "may the best man win".

...of course I know that's not possible - I'm just venting a bit since you started the thread that invites venting.

Comments on this post
Cgirl agrees: I understand, I don't like political parties either...I think both Kerry and Bush were terrible candidates, I just wish we could get some more honest people in government...but politics=lies in my opinion.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 18, 2006, 03:18 PM   #7  
Full Member
jduke44 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 401
jduke44 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I am not up on politics that much nor have the time to be but I do have one question. They knew about the energy crisis back in the 70's. Why didn't the presidents and the politicians try to do anything then? Also, there were a few times Clinton had his sites on Osama but couldn't have the guts to do anything about it. Or he couldn't get out of bed in time...if you know what I mean. I agree with Rick that every one is blaming one perosn for this whole mess when he is the only one to have the guts to stand up and fight.

Comments on this post
RickJ agrees: Granted, guts don't earn points, but it's certainly better than trying to say "I was against it after I was for it", like the other candidate tried to lean on.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 18, 2006, 04:32 PM   #8  
Über Member
NeedKarma is offline
 
NeedKarma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Online
Posts: 7,603
NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
What about that time that famous Rumsfeld handshake with Saddam?


http://www.globalpolicy.org/security...sseinindex.htm

Support him then bomb the crap outta him - what happened in between?

Comments on this post
orange agrees: Yeah no kidding!!
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 18, 2006, 04:59 PM   #9  
Ultra Member
orange is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,365
orange See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.orange See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
When I first saw Fahrenheit 911 in the theatre, I liked it and mostly agreed with Michael Moore, but I thought he was going a bit overboard. However, as you say Cgirl a lot has happened since then, and now I agree with pretty much everything in the movie. And yeah it's not just Bush, but he does have responsibility as the president.

Comments on this post
Cgirl agrees: Thank you Orange...all I am saying is someone has to take responsibility for what is happening NOW...and that should be Bush
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 18, 2006, 06:06 PM   #10  
Christianity Expert
Fr_Chuck is offline
 
Fr_Chuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 36,929
Fr_Chuck has disabled reputation
Sorry Michael Moore in my opinon should be called a tradior and shot, his half truths and lies made into a film is about as untrue and anti Ameican as one can get. He has been merley a trouble maker who has no agenda other than attacking others.

Comments on this post
jduke44 agrees: very true.
NeedKarma disagrees: Too bad you are so pro-american and yet do not believe in free speech. A Father wouyld thinks someone shouyld "be shot" for making a movie? What has this world come to?
Cgirl disagrees: Michael Moore was stating his opinions in that movie, take them or leave them. That is one thing that hasn't changed YET in our country...freedom of speech...and thank God for that! I don't think anyone should be shot down for their opinion.
speedball1 disagrees: Ahh!! The religious right speaks!!
startover22 agrees: How do we recognize the difference between free speech and being a traitor? I believe he demonstrated both in this movie.
  Reply With Quote
 
     

Your Answer
Email me when someone replies to my answer
Join Login



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Ask your question or search...




Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Search this Thread

Advanced Search

Bookmarks





Copyright ©2003 - 2009, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:19 PM.