 | | | Why is it normally wrong to kill a person?
Asked May 29, 2007, 12:32 PM
—
141 Answers Is it simply a human convention? Thread Summary |
141 Answers
 | Über Member | |
Sep 30, 2007, 03:37 PM
| | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by tonyrey Is it simply a human convention? | It is if you want to be an atheist and deny God. But the Bible clearly says "Thou shalt not kill." That's good enough for me. | | |  | Full Member | |
Oct 16, 2007, 08:52 PM
| | | Quote: |
Originally Posted by tonyrey Is it simply a human convention? | There are several reasons but I think one that can be argued against even the most cynical of peoples is this;
It is socially irresponsible. If you kill someone that extinguishes their existence. If that person where some day going to contribute something to man kind, maybe a sort of technology, that would either improve or preserve our lives you would have eliminated that person. So in the interest of self preservation you would have shot yourself in the foot. | | |  | Junior Member | |
Feb 20, 2009, 07:20 PM
| | | We humans are the most selfish of all species !
We make rules and often bend them when we don't find arguments working for us or situations don't work out for us .
We play safe trying to act morally but often do it loosely as to sin is basic human tendency of distinguishing it self from the group of commoner> | | |  | New Member | |
Feb 20, 2009, 10:07 PM
| | | Killing someone is wrong because one uses them merely as a means to someone else's ends. People deserve to always be treated always as an end and never as a means to an end. (Kant) | | |  | Full Member | |
Feb 23, 2009, 08:55 PM
| | | Because it is evil, life is precious, and you have no right to rob him of it.
Maggie 3 | | |  | Junior Member | |
Mar 4, 2009, 01:59 AM
| | | Quote:
Originally Posted by Maggie 3 because it is evil, life is precious, and you have no right to rob him of it.
Maggie 3 | I agree with you but if people decide to reject the value of life, arguing that death destroys everything, we cannot force them to change their view. But they are not entitled to impose it on everyone else and drag them down.
Schopenhauer believed it would have been better if life had never existed on this planet but he was inconsistent: he also believed that beauty can liberate us from our misery! The most logical thing he could have done would have been to commit suicide or let himself die painlessly | | |  | Ultra Member | |
Mar 15, 2009, 11:32 PM
| | | Of all living things on this planet , humans as far as we know have reasoning and consciences that we are alive. In turn we become aware that there are living beings like me and living things around us. We are aware we are alive. This in itself makes us a Stewart of life and of all livings things.
We have the means and power to respect or destroy that life and all living things on the planet. Because of being aware of that, it makes us a Steward of protecting a life/lives and living things around us, and in turn ourselves.
Our basic instinct of self preservation is hardwired
To take a life for the sake “because we can” demonstrates we don’t value life nor our life and cheapened the greatest gift as we should no it, being alive. Therefore it would be morally wrong to take a life from someone that wasn’t yours to take just because “you can” This is what separates us from the rest of the animal world.
Simply put. I tell my kids.” Remember, You hope the other persons life is just as important to them as your life is to you” Some day that may be achieved, and by doing so we now have all basic morals.
Another Basic moral is…. Do unto them as you would have them do unto you. Taking a life just to take it becomes morally wrong at the most basic level,
I realize this is an old post but some things keep on living | | |  | New Member | |
Apr 27, 2009, 05:48 AM
| | | Human life starts with cry and should cross many cries and ends , it shouldnot be ended by killing | | |  | Full Member | |
Aug 3, 2009, 04:24 PM
| | | WELL...what rights do you have to take away someone's right to live? It's wrong to the victim, but maybe in the killers' minds, he/she has a different idea.
You can't steal, that's bad, so killing is basically stealing someone's life. | | |  | New Member | |
Aug 14, 2009, 09:47 AM
| | | Quote: |
But they are not entitled to impose it on everyone else and drag them down.
| Why on earth not? | | | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | |
Check out some similar questions!
How to kill loneliness? [ 5 Answers ]
I'm doing my first year at university and I'm not in my country as well. At the times I feel really lonely and I don't know how to deal with it. I can be on my own, but most of the time I like to be with people and doing things together. I really want to be able to be more on my own and learn how...
My cat is trying to kill me [ 7 Answers ]
I don't know what happened, but last night, my loving cat that's about 4 1/2 years old now went crazy. My wife and I had to go to the emergency room shortly afterwards. The cat went nuts, just straight out attacking us... We did nothing towards her to provoke this and she will not give up the...
Artifical person vs. Natural person? [ 9 Answers ]
How would the court deal with a natural person vs, artificial person? By definition a artificial person is a corporation (strawman) which the court would have jurisdication. How does the court deal with a natural person, a human being? How does the court obtain jurisdication over a human being?...
If Looks Could Kill [ 1 Answers ]
Does anyone know where I can get a copy of this movie with Richard Grieco on DVD? On mailorder if possible. Thanks :)
View more Philosophy questions Search
|