intelligent design

brad sue · #1 Oct 12, 2005, 02:48 PM

hey,
I have a question . please help me on it:

Stephen jay Gould thought the best way to argue against intelligent design as the origin of modern flora and fauma was to focus on such oddities of nature as a whale fetus's developping and then dissolving a comlpete set fo teeth, in contrast with things like a seagull's wing.
Why did he think so, and why would Hume (philo)disagree, and argue that a seagull's wind would do just fine?

Philo as you certainly know is the character in the Dialogue concernnig natural religion by Hume

PLease tell me what you think about this question

B

NeedKarma · Oct 12, 2005, 02:49 PM

Sounds like homework.

Starman · May 14, 2006, 10:45 PM

Why would a seagull's flatualance-"wind" have anything to do with its evolution? : )



At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to: Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics. Accept money for answers that you provide. Communicate privately with other members (PM). See fewer ads. Sign Up!