Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
  Advanced
Register  |  Log in  
   Ask    
 Answer  
  Help  

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Business & Careers > Payroll   »   Employers never paid employee taxes for 2007

 
Question Tools Search this Question Display Modes
Question
 
 
#1  
Old Mar 13, 2008, 04:44 PM
drm42
New Member
drm42 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5
drm42 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Employers never paid employee taxes for 2007

My former employers closed their business 12/31/2007. During 2007 my fellow employees and I received pay checks with stubs indicating proper taxes were deducted. It is now March 2008 and we (the employees) have still not received our W-2's. I have tried to contact my former employers by every means possible to no avail. I notified the Labor commission and was told my former employers never paid any employee taxes for 2007. I contacted the IRS and was sent form 4852. I now have to estimate my wages and taxes and submit them to the IRS.
If my former employers never submitted the taxes, and we, the employees are submitting estimated wages and taxes, will we the employees be penalized if the IRS never acquires the missing money from my former employer?
What penalties will my former employers face for pocketing my Social Security/Medicare, state and federal taxes?
Is this seen as a crime against me and my fellow employees for burglary since my former employers, took our money with knowing intent, and by issuing pay stubs with the pretence of submitting our taxes to the proper agencies?
Is it possible for we the employees to file suit against our former employers?
FYI: Business located in California, and employers a husband & Wife.
More than one question.. Hopes thats ok!
Thank you

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Mar 16, 2008, 10:37 PM   #2  
morgaine300
Accounting Expert
morgaine300 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,396
morgaine300 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I don't know if there's anything specific about California itself (though I don't see why it should be any different), but for federal, the employer is responsible for paying the taxes they deducted. So did they actually deduct them? Do you still have your checkstubs?

Hopefully there's a lesson for anyone reading this. Always, always, always keep all your pay check stubs!!!!

I'm not familiar with form 4852. But I just looked it up. It's merely an estimated substitute for a W-2. Since a W-2 doesn't require you to pay taxes already deducted (only anything more you would owe), there shouldn't be any difference using this form. There's isn't anything on it, or in the instructions, indicating that you are liable for any taxes deducted and not paid by the employer. Not getting a W-2 doesn't really change the concept behind it. i.e. when I was doing payroll privately at companies, if we did not pay the taxes due, it came back on us, and all penalties went to us. It had nothing to do with the employees because it had already been deducted from their checks.

You shouldn't be responsible for this. The IRS should go after the employer. As long as nothing happens with you, then this is all on the heads of the employer. They are the ones facing the penalties. And it's not a crime against you -- it's against the government agencies.

Do you know for sure they deducted this money with the intent of pocketing it? Sometimes companies don't get that the IRS always comes first and they just don't have the money to pay it when it becomes due. I've worked for companies like that. (They still get the penalities and interest; it's just a difference of whether it's fraud or not.)

Comments on this post
drm42 agrees: A fine answer and quick response!
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Mar 17, 2008, 08:12 AM   #3  
drm42
New Member
drm42 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5
drm42 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Morgaine300....Thank you for your response.
I do in fact have my pay stubs to estimate my taxes from, and with the stubs, it is pretty simple to do the estimation.
My former fellow employee's went to apply for their unemployement and were told that there was no record of them working at all in 2007, and their unemployement would have to be estimated from records in 2006!
As far as fraud goes, don't employers have to file quartly taxes? I contacted the firm that handled the bookkeeping for the company, and they said the last time they did business with my employer was at the beginning of 2006 to have 2005 W-2's made up, and that was to have the W-2's done from employee records. The bookkeeper stated to me my employers did no other business throughout 2005.
Again.. Thanks for your response
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Mar 17, 2008, 09:41 PM   #4  
morgaine300
Accounting Expert
morgaine300 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,396
morgaine300 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by drm42
My former fellow employee's went to apply for their unemployement and were told that there was no record of them working at all in 2007, and their unemployement would have to be estimated from records in 2006!

I don't know how CA works, but here there is a quarterly report sent in that lists every employee and their pay for the quarter. So the state unemployment office has record of all this. If it was never filed, they wouldn't have record. Assuming your state has unemployment, the fellow employee may want to have the state office to check into this company. In most states this is not a deduction, but it's still a benefit that you are supposed to have.

Quote:
Originally Posted by drm42
As far as fraud goes, don't employers have to file quartly taxes?

Yeah, but it's not that unusual for it to not get filed, and it's pretty easy to claim they forgot, or the bookkeeper screwed up, or they thought the accountant took care of it, etc. The IRS would have to prove fraud. It will still result in penalties and interest, both for not filing and for the late payments. The IRS may never get their money, but they'll try.

I hope this all comes out OK. At least you have the information you need to get the correct records recorded.
  Reply With Quote
 
     


Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors

Similar Questions
Question Asker Topic Answers Last Post
hourly employee working 2,080 hours a year, but is getting paid for just 1,920 ljen18 Payroll 5 Mar 13, 2008 01:32 PM
can an employee be paid regular and with a 1099 for extra work gtg1 Human Resources 2 Mar 13, 2008 08:14 AM
Early Withdraw - 401K Taxes Paid vs. Taxes Owe jastone Taxes 7 Jan 30, 2008 06:35 AM
deduct taxes paid on new car bought in 2007 q1024 Taxes 11 Jan 6, 2008 02:30 PM
FICA Tax must paid by employer or Employee? is there any excemption in it? spectrum Payroll 1 Feb 18, 2007 04:05 PM




Copyright ©2003 - 2007, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:26 PM.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.