The Hindu Upanishads say that humans are the highest of creation. Humans are
capable of inventing things which are not present in nature.
The concept of rape is a human invention. A woman can also rape a man, but it
is usually not termed as rape or not taken as seriously.
"I agree with the claim that rape of a man by a woman and rape of a woman by a man are not equivalent. There's clearly a kind of rape that a woman cannot do to a man that a man can do to a woman, and that is to have sex when the other party is not aroused at all. There are purely biological reasons for this. There can be sexual assault of some sort, but it won't be outright rape of a man by a woman unless he is aroused enough that the act can even take place. That's a real disanalogy, and I think it has severe consequences for how we think about rape of a man by a woman as opposed to rape of a woman by a man. Men can rape women in ways that women can't rape men".
http://parablemania.ektopos.com/arch...alefemale.html
Can a female rape another female?
... the definition of rape is not limited to male-female or female-male; it can most definitely be male-male or female-female. Once someone begins to sexually touch or feel or lick any part of another person who did not give consent to the act, it is considered a violation of that person’s body.
http://www.soc.ucsb.edu/sexinfo/?article=faq&refid=557
Data, research papers and statistics on various aspects of childhood sexual abuse, female rape and male male rape:
1) Gender role socialization and male-on-male vs. female-on-male child sexual abuse.
2) Asian and non-Asian attitudes toward rape, sexual harassment, and sexuality.
3) Male and female recipients of unwanted sexual contact in a college student sample: prevalence rates, alcohol use, and depression symptoms.
4) Rape Of Men Is Not Uncommon, Study Says.
http://www.aest.org.uk/survivors/res...on_abuse.shtml
Throughout much of ancient history, the crime of rape was viewed less as a variety of assault on a female's autonomy, but rather a serious property crime against the man to whom she "belonged." This was especially true in the case of betrothed virgins, as the loss of chastity was perceived as severely depreciating her value to her husband. The law, in such cases, would void the betrothal and demand financial compensation from the rapist, payable to the woman's household, whose "goods" were "damaged."
Male-male rape has historically been shrouded in secrecy due to the stigma men associate with being raped by other men. Fewer than one in ten male-male rapes are reported, according to one expert. As a group, male rape victims reported a lack of services and support, and legal systems are often ill equipped to deal with this type of crime.
Most cultures worldwide have not considered the possibility that women can commit rape against men and women. Most legal codes on rape do not legislate for this as a crime, as rape is generally defined to include the act of penetration on behalf of the rapist. As of 2007, in South Africa a gang of women has reportedly been raping young men. However, the relevance of this issue has been overshadowed by more prominent instantiations of rape, and it is widely regarded, particularly by feminists and academics interested in feminist issues and sexual matters of intellectual interest, that until the more prominent issues of rape are addressed first, not much will come of the former, less common instances of rape, as addressed here.
"Victim blaming" is holding the victim of a crime to be in whole or in part responsible for what has happened to them. In the context of rape, this concept refers to the Just World Theory and popular attitudes that certain victim behaviours (such as flirting, or wearing sexually-provocative clothing) may encourage rape. In extreme cases, victims are said to have "asked for it", simply by not behaving demurely. In most Western countries, the defense of provocation is not accepted as a mitigation for rape. A global survey of attitudes toward sexual violence by the Global Forum for Health Research shows that victim-blaming concepts are at least partially accepted in many countries. In some countries, victim-blaming is more common, and women who have been raped are sometimes deemed to have behaved improperly. Often, these are countries where there is a significant social divide between the freedoms and status afforded to men and women.
American social critic Camille Paglia, and some sociobiologists, have argued that the victim-blaming intuition may have a non-psychological component in some cases. Some sociobiological models suggest that it may be genetically-ingrained for certain men and women to allow themselves to be more vulnerable to rape, and that this may be a biological feature of members of the species.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape
Rape as an adaptation among animals:
It has long been observed that some animals appear to show behavior resembling rape in humans, such as combining sexual intercourse with violent assault, often observed in ducks and geese. Sometimes an animal is approached and sexually penetrated while it appears to not want it -- e.g. it struggles or tries to escape. These observations of forced sex among animals are not controversial. What is controversial is the interpretation of these observations, and the extension of theories based on them to humans.
It is because rape can result in increased fitness that some sociobiologists theorize that rape may be genetically advantageous for rapists, and thus prosper as a psychological adaptation.
It has also been recorded that certain species of mole will 'rape' new borns of their own species, the advantage to this is that when those moles mature and become fertile, they will become pregnant with the sperm of the mole that had mated with them at a very young age.
According to these theories, males who attempt rape are considered more desperate to mate, and one result of this desperation could be endemic misinterpretation of a female's signals. This could illustrate why many rapists justify their actions with "she said no but meant yes". Variations of this theme are common. For example, there is no clear, objective delineation between sexual touch and non-sexual touch. Holding hands may be considered by one side to be a sexual touch whereas the other considers it completely platonic.
Also, in some countries, women are forbidden to leave the house with any amount of skin showing (for example Hijab). Some sociobiologists see this as a way to reduce the female's likelihood of attracting attention and (by extension) rape. However, since it is usually the woman's husband who does not allow her to leave without being completely covered, it is more likely that the custom's function is simply to prevent her from attracting sexual attention from other men.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociobi...eories_of_rape
Society is becoming increasingly aware of male rape. However, experts believe that current male rape statistics vastly under-represent the actual number of males age 12 and over who are raped each year.
http://www.ncvc.org/ncvc/main.aspx?d...cumentID=32361
http://www.male-rape.org.uk/index.htm
http://www.radessays.com/viewpaper/7...rks_Essay.html
Can the feromones excreted at the arm pits of ladies invite rape?
http://health.discovery.com/centers/...phermones.html
http://www.athenainstitute.com/discovery.html
http://www.ishipress.com/humanodo.htm
http://www.cnn.com/HEALTH/9803/11/pheromones/index.html
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...9/ai_n12741733