Hi Serious, there's something 'bout your first paragraph....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Serious Student  If a Black Hole was created, it wouldn't do anything and by Hawking's Radiation it would fizzle out within micro seconds. Such 'primordial' Black Holes would have a very small mass. |
So far I agree.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Serious Student The gravitational attraction of Black Holes is also depended on it's mass, hence the degree of space time curvature. The only reason why light falls in is because of the warped curvature seeing as light uses this '4th dimensional medium' in which to travel - so it would travel straight into a Black hole. |
You infer a black hole (bh) is eternal.
Hawking proved that as a bh "acquires" mass, the negative charge of this mass accumulates, and as it accumulates, it eventually dissipates the bh, while the positive is radiated back out into the Universe, (Hawking Radiation (HR))
Would you agree or disagree that HR applies to all bh regardless of life duration or mass?
~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ Quote:
Originally Posted by Serious Student 'Massful' particles are merely affected by the gravity - although I can't understand why a Constant mass has it's gravitational attraction exponentially increased just by it being compressed.
Please advise? |
Quote:
|
If a Black Hole was created, it wouldn't do anything and by Hawking's Radiation it would fizzle out within micro seconds. Such 'primordial' Black Holes would have a very small mass
|
Therefore no singularity?
Once a singularity is created the bh doesn't compress, it stretches.
It is in this stretching that quantum mechanics (qm) takes over, and increases the g force.
Kip Thorne has new insight in the workings of bh. Essentially he is saying that once a singularity is created the bh becomes invisible, again qm.
I caught it in one of his interviews, but have been unable to refer back to it. Do you have any information on this?
k
Linear Mode
