How long can it take to settle a workmans comp case WITH a lawyer
Asked Feb 28, 2012, 08:04 AM
—
15 Answers
Work injury sustained in July 2010..case required hiring of lawyer..first initial (back)payout dec 2010..since then receiving biweekly perm disibility benefit. It is now Feb 2012,How long until final settlement..lawyer can never winnow this down to a timeline..why? Three weeks...two months six months?
My workers comp case that I had to get a lawyer for took about 10 years to reach a final settlement. It happened in the back of the court room minutes before we were to start court.
We'd like to understand what you find wrong with Fr_Chuck's answer:
What's inaccurate about this answer? Say it in 25 words or less here and/or reply in the thread with more detail.
Please focus on the content not the person!
Link to a credible and well-known source. You can provide a URL or simply describe the source.
Is there a problem with the extent of your injuries, whether you have reached your maximum healing? I never understand the long delays. I am personally aware of a case in NY which took 4 years from the date of all parties agreeing that maximum healing had been reached.
You are paying for legal counsel - I'd push and push and push, not for a date but for an answer.
The "money" in WC cases is in volume. You can't make a living on 1 case a week so you are probably 1 of many. That does NOT mean that your voice shouldn't be heard. The Attorney works for you. Ultimately "you" pay him (in an around, about way).
I'd push for an answer. If there is a missing piece of the puzzle, find out what it is and address it.
We'd like to understand what you find wrong with JudyKayTee's answer:
What's inaccurate about this answer? Say it in 25 words or less here and/or reply in the thread with more detail.
Please focus on the content not the person!
Link to a credible and well-known source. You can provide a URL or simply describe the source.
Comp is such a racket. The carriers don't want to pay without dragging it out as long as they can, and they wait for claimants to slip up and be seen to be not permanently disabled. Lawyers make deals behind your back that may not be to your benefit. It works both ways, because of the claimants who are either outright frauds with shady doctors or who manage to make a living doing work they aren't supposed to be able to physically do.
This is unsubstantiated but I am just throwing it in as part of the commonly heard explanation.
We'd like to understand what you find wrong with joypulv's answer:
What's inaccurate about this answer? Say it in 25 words or less here and/or reply in the thread with more detail.
Please focus on the content not the person!
Link to a credible and well-known source. You can provide a URL or simply describe the source.
Comp is such a racket. The carriers don't want to pay without dragging it out as long as they can, and they wait for claimants to slip up and be seen to be not permanently disabled. Lawyers make deals behind your back that may not be to your benefit. It works both ways, because of the claimants who are either outright frauds with shady doctors or who manage to make a living doing work they aren't supposed to be able to physically do.
This is unsubstantiated but I am just throwing it in as part of the commonly heard explanation.
Joy, sooner or later we had to disagree ... and this is it!
If a lawyer makes a "behind your back" deal, then report him/her to the Bar Association. It's unethical, it hurts the profession.
I hear these complaints all the time when people don't understand particular laws or situations. I cannot speak for insurance companies and Physicians but I CAN speak for Attorneys. To "sell your client short," settle for less, hurts everyone - including the Attorney.
I actually get complaints about my work - why I can't get someone to say someone else was at fault, why I can't prove that a husband or wife was cheating, why I can't get someone to admit something. Because I can't put words in someone's mouth. You need to be in a profession to understand it.
We'd like to understand what you find wrong with JudyKayTee's answer:
What's inaccurate about this answer? Say it in 25 words or less here and/or reply in the thread with more detail.
Please focus on the content not the person!
Link to a credible and well-known source. You can provide a URL or simply describe the source.
I appreciate all your comments but I guess I am hoping to hear from someone who went through a very close scenario. This was a construction neck injury,,he had the surgery..he has a permanent disab "rating"..he clearly will not be in the same capacity, construction wise..to continue anything close to what he did before. He does not want any more surgery whatsoever..he wants to settle and get vocational training, retraining if you will,.. from settlement as well. He is 50 yrs old. Construction and all its typical injuries is really not the career option any longer. (This is his major skill set tho..20 plus years in all phases of construction)
Our sense is the lawyers is simply too damn busy and does not report anything to us unless there is a definitive new paper/filing development. We leave messages and we do not hear back. etc
We'd like to understand what you find wrong with capgirl49's answer:
What's inaccurate about this answer? Say it in 25 words or less here and/or reply in the thread with more detail.
Please focus on the content not the person!
Link to a credible and well-known source. You can provide a URL or simply describe the source.
You'd pretty much have to find a message/chat board to locate someone with the same situation. I know that WC will not settle until the total extent of the injuries is known AND the injured party has exhausted all treatment options.
I work in the legal field. I'd make an appointment and talk to the Attorney face to face. HE (or she) works for you, not the other way around.
I know it's a frustrating process.
EDIT: Once again I don't understand the "dislike" which both Joy and I got. I work in the legal field. I work on WC cases. I know how the system works. Okay, I'm not a man who worked construction for X number of years and now needs to be retrained. I don't think that disqualifies me from knowing the law - one person's experience is not the experience of another person.
We'd like to understand what you find wrong with JudyKayTee's answer:
What's inaccurate about this answer? Say it in 25 words or less here and/or reply in the thread with more detail.
Please focus on the content not the person!
Link to a credible and well-known source. You can provide a URL or simply describe the source.
capgirl49, perhaps you don't understand how an unhelpful vote works here - it doesn't mean 'tell me more or I don't agree;' it's for incorrect information. When you 'neg' people, they don't want to come back. Even Fr_Chuck, who might have talked more about this, may be reluctant to say another peep to you.
We'd like to understand what you find wrong with joypulv's answer:
What's inaccurate about this answer? Say it in 25 words or less here and/or reply in the thread with more detail.
Please focus on the content not the person!
Link to a credible and well-known source. You can provide a URL or simply describe the source.
capgirl49, perhaps you don't understand how an unhelpful vote works here - it doesn't mean 'tell me more or I don't agree;' it's for incorrect information. When you 'neg' people, they don't want to come back. Even Fr_Chuck, who might have talked more about this, may be reluctant to say another peep to you.
It certainly keeps other people from chiming in on this - and other threads.
We'd like to understand what you find wrong with JudyKayTee's answer:
What's inaccurate about this answer? Say it in 25 words or less here and/or reply in the thread with more detail.
Please focus on the content not the person!
Link to a credible and well-known source. You can provide a URL or simply describe the source.
Sorry about the unhelpful ratings..you are right I did not know how such a vote works here..I apologize. I certainly do not want to turn anybody off from replying. I appreciate all the feedback.
We'd like to understand what you find wrong with capgirl49's answer:
What's inaccurate about this answer? Say it in 25 words or less here and/or reply in the thread with more detail.
Please focus on the content not the person!
Link to a credible and well-known source. You can provide a URL or simply describe the source.
When you tell your lawyer that he is to except the settlement and he call workmans comp. And they set up a meeting with a judge at a state building. Can I at this time object to the agreement that workmans comp has agreed too?
The medical practice doesn't carry workmans comp insurance. Can/is the employer responsible for paying medical bills associated with a clear on the job injury/ incident? An example would be: an employee who has just drawn blood on a patient who is known to have HIV, Hep C has accidently stuck...
I was recently hurt on the job and suffered a broken wrist resulting in about 50-60 percent loss of use of my wrist and some loss of finger motion.My question is there a compensation settlement because of any permanent damage to me. I have been with this company for 22 plus years and they have been...