Question
 | |  | | | 
Mar 15, 2008, 05:35 PM
| | New Member | | Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 23
| | | Is this a HIPAA Violation? Is it a HIPAA violation if I discussed a pt's care with her family? The mother had tried to kill herself and the daughter was her next of kin. She present when the care was rendered to her mom. All I said was "I was the one who started the IV on your mom" and my supervisor said I could get sued over that. Can I? She was the next of kin and present when it happened. | | | | | | |
Answers
 | |  | | |
Mar 15, 2008, 06:01 PM
|
#2
| | | Health Expert
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: La La Land
Posts: 23,289
| Yes, that was a HIPAA violation unless the mother gave you consent to give the daughter that information. |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Mar 15, 2008, 06:17 PM
|
#3
| | New Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 23
| Her mother was declared mentally unstable and it was her daughter giving us permission to treat her. The daughter was the one signing all the forms. Wouldn't we be able to give her information? |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Mar 15, 2008, 06:21 PM
|
#4
| | | Health Expert
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: La La Land
Posts: 23,289
| HIPAA with mental issues is a very slippery slope. Yes, her daughter may have been signing the forms for treatment, but the mother (at this point) did not consent for anyone to receive any information about her. Mental health issues are very tight lipped.
I don't see the big deal about who started the IV, but it's still a violation. Next of kin has nothing to do with it. And, if she was present, then she saw you start the IV, correct? |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Mar 15, 2008, 06:25 PM
|
#5
| | New Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 23
| I don't see the big deal either. My boss is the one making a fuss about it. I was just wanting to get clarification. |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Mar 15, 2008, 06:27 PM
|
#6
| | | Health Expert
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: La La Land
Posts: 23,289
| You wanted clarification on what? |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Mar 15, 2008, 07:28 PM
|
#7
| | Christianity Expert
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Georgia
Posts: 36,929
| if the daughter was the legal guardian, it is different, but not merely next of kin. |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Mar 15, 2008, 07:42 PM
|
#8
| | New Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 23
| Would she automatically get that role since her mother was not able to consent to anything due to mental state. |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Mar 15, 2008, 07:52 PM
|
#9
| | Health Expert
Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: La La Land
Posts: 23,289
| Nobody automatically gets that "role"
A consent for release of information must ALWAYS be signed. |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Mar 15, 2008, 07:58 PM
|
#10
| | Christianity Expert
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Georgia
Posts: 36,929
| no a guardian has to be assigned and/ or appointed by the court. |
| | | | | | | |
Search this Thread |
Bookmarks
| | |