At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them
answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in
answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you
will be able to:
Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+
topics.
Recently I was served with a civil action complaint from a credit card that I am six months delinquent on. The credit card company is sueing me in the PA Court of Common Pleas for the amount owed on the account. My husband has the same card, also six months delinquent, account was opend around the same time, and he owes more on his account than I do, and his account went to a collection agency. I would like to know why or how credit card companies decide who gets sued and who gets sent to collections.
Many things go into these decisions.
They look at the amount, and they look at the odds that they will be able to collect it.
When they assign to an agency, they are normally giving up at least half of what is still owed.
They would only do this if they feel it will be difficult to collect even if they obtain a judgment.
If they feel confident that once the judgment is obtained, they can collect it, then they will be more likely to keep the debt and collect all of it themselves instead of giving up half of it.
Chances are they have looked at your assets, your employment situation, and have decided that they can probably get all that is owed to them on your account.
Life is not always fair, this is probably a good example of that.
Seriously, you have gotten good advice here. The most likely reasons are different account managers and someone believing a different level of collections is needed.