Artifical person vs. natural person??

mr.yet · #1 Mar 6, 2006, 09:16 AM

How would the court deal with a natural person vs, artificial person? By definition a artificial person is a corporation (strawman) which the court would have jurisdication. How does the court deal with a natural person, a human being? How does the court obtain jurisdication over a human being??
Looking for a definition????

ARTIFICIAL. What is the result of, or relates to, the arts; opposed to natural; thus we say a corporation is an artificial person, in opposition to a natural person.

Artificial accession is the uniting one property to another by art, opposed to a simple natural union. 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 503.

ARTIFICIAL PERSON. In a figurative sense, a body of men or company are sometimes called an artificial person, because the law associates them as one, and gives them various powers possessed by natural persons.

Corporations are such artificial persons. 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 177.

3. But when the word "Persons" is spoken of in legislative acts, natural persons will be intended, unless something appear in the context to show that it applies to artificial persons. 1 Scam. R. 178.

RickJ · Mar 7, 2006, 02:25 AM

Please clarify. Can you summarize what you are asking, or telling, with a sentence?

mr.yet · Mar 7, 2006, 03:07 AM

The court tell me that I am a juristic person, which means a corporation and a corporation is a artificial person. It would seems that the court only as jurisdication over corporation and artificial persons.

In this case does the court have jurisdication over a natural person, as human being???

A corporation is a juristic person organized by government to accomplish certain ends, which may be public or quasi public, though for other purposes of classification the corporation ...
6. FindLaw: CLARK v. WILLIARD, 292 U.S. 112 (1934)

sideoutshu · Mar 7, 2006, 06:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr.yet

The court tell me that I am a juristic person, which means a corporation and a corporation is a artificial person. It would seems that the court only as jurisdication over corporation and artificial persons.

In this case does the court have jurisdication over a natural person, as human being???

A corporation is a juristic person organized by government to accomplish certain ends, which may be public or quasi public, though for other purposes of classification the corporation ...
6. FindLaw: CLARK v. WILLIARD, 292 U.S. 112 (1934)

Is this a joke?

mr.yet · Mar 7, 2006, 06:04 AM

No this is not a joke! The court say I am a juristic person, not a human being .

sideoutshu · Mar 7, 2006, 06:10 AM

What on earth are you talking about? And what is your question?

RickJ · Mar 7, 2006, 06:14 AM

One more try:

If there is a question here, please put it in a sentence.

Otherwise, if it's something for discussion, likewise put it in one sentence so we can all understand...and We'll move it to Member Discussions.

mr.yet · Mar 7, 2006, 06:21 AM

What jurisdication does the courts have over a human being?

What is the name for that jurisdication, civil, criminal, of what?? That is the question.



At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to: Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics. Accept money for answers that you provide. Communicate privately with other members (PM). See fewer ads. Sign Up!