Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
  Advanced
Register  |  Log in  
   Ask    
 Answer  
  Help  

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Health & Wellness > Medical Science   »   Cause of Homosexuality

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Question
 
 
Old Aug 19, 2007, 09:14 AM
pacermb
New Member
pacermb is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 9
pacermb See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Cause of Homosexuality

Has anyone actually discovered what causes people to be born homosexual ? Is it genetic, a fault in the DNA, what? Is there a cure ?

 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Sep 30, 2007, 10:39 AM   #21  
Full Member
americangayboy is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 220
americangayboy See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I dont' think anyone who has taken even one research oriented class thinks it comes down to the nature vs nuture debate, in fact, people in behavior genetics think it's funny when people even bring it up, because virtually nothing is determined solely by biology or solely by the environment. Even things like eye color are influenced by by diet. We can say for certain that there is a biological influence, however, we can't say that biology is the only cause.
 
 
     
 
 
Old Sep 30, 2007, 11:19 AM   #22  
Junior Member
gallivant_fellow is offline
 
gallivant_fellow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 159
gallivant_fellow See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TOONICE
I agree to an extent with what you are saying...however, to suggest it is a defect or abnormally is to also suggest there could be a way to fix it. If evolution has created a percentage where "every species has about the same percentage of homosexuals", would this not be a form of evolving for a reason. Only the strongest survive is the major theory of evolution....evolving to survive...and only the strongest organisms/animals/plants/etc. able to do this will or face extinction. Granted Homosexuals, by theory and popular opinion, can't procreate. By choice they can reproduce and maybe genetic material is passed on and may remain dormant till the right conditions exsist through the generations.

This also leads to question if the Homosexual does choose to have sex with the opposite sex, then does this make them bisexual (which I question the ability to love, sexually, same sex and opposite sex equally) or is it a homosexual giving in to the urge, unconsciously, for homosexuals to survive for possibly generations?

What would also be the reasons for for evolution to homosexual....maybe a form of population control?

Just playing out the reasoning....
Evolution has also created a percentage where every species has about the same number of anything. I saw something about a resort island where monkeys can easily obtain alcohol, and their preferences, number of alcoholics, etc. are identical to ours. Watch it if you want, it's pretty cool. YouTube - drunk monkeys

You also talk about homosexuality like it's a gene that's passed down and was fine tuned by nature, no one knows this. It could just be a mother's anti-bodies going crazy or many other causes that aren't genetically supposed to happen. Look at extreme mental and physical retardation in babies. Is this a gene used to help the human race? Insulting example, but I'm just saying that some things in nature aren't perfect.

If homosexuality is a genetic advantage for a species and you are right, I don't think population control would be the reason. Humans thrive in numbers. I think it would be to help balance out the playing field, making sure everyone has a partner and nothing more. Like if a mother made too many males and they were all straight, things might get too hectic.
 
 
     
 
 
Old Sep 30, 2007, 01:46 PM   #23  
Full Member
americangayboy is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 220
americangayboy See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Gallivant, I think you're confused. I'm not offended that you used mental retardation in your comparison, I'm offended that you're comparing a maladaptive gene to a benign (or possibly adaptive) gene. Also, you read one study about hormone antibodies and you're convinced that this is the reason people are gay? It doesn't work like that. If it did, I could claim that gay people make better parents than staight people. There are a handful of studies that show children of gay and lesbian parents are more intelligent, better adjusted, financially more stable (of course, this is on average) than children of straight parents.
 
 
     
 
 
Old Sep 30, 2007, 07:24 PM   #24  
Junior Member
gallivant_fellow is offline
 
gallivant_fellow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 159
gallivant_fellow See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by americangayboy
Gallivant, I think you're confused. I'm not offended that you used mental retardation in your comparison, I'm offended that you're comparing a maladaptive gene to a benign (or possibly adaptive) gene. Also, you read one study about hormone antibodies and you're convinced that this is the reason people are gay? It doesn't work like that. If it did, I could claim that gay people make better parents than staight people. There are a handful of studies that show children of gay and lesbian parents are more intelligent, better adjusted, financially more stable (of course, this is on average) than children of straight parents.
I'm not confused. I have read many studies, but I have presented a link to one of them for your interest. I never said that antibodies are the reason people are gay. I did however offer it as a possibility and said "Maybe this is the cause." Maybe it is.
 
 
     
 
 
Old Sep 30, 2007, 07:30 PM   #25  
Full Member
americangayboy is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 220
americangayboy See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Well, it's pretty clear that there isn't a single cause...to anything. Yes, the study you cite is compelling, but what you're saying is inaccurate and somewhat offensive. Homosexuality is nothing like mental retardation, at least no moreso than homosexuality is like race, hair color, height, or any other variable.
 
 
     
 
 
Old Oct 1, 2007, 08:44 AM   #26  
New Member
TOONICE is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7
TOONICE See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gallivant_fellow
Evolution has also created a percentage where every species has about the same number of anything. I saw something about a resort island where monkeys can easily obtain alcohol, and their preferences, number of alcoholics, etc. are identical to ours. Watch it if you want, it's pretty cool. YouTube - drunk monkeys

You also talk about homosexuality like it's a gene that's passed down and was fine tuned by nature, no one knows this. It could just be a mother's anti-bodies going crazy or many other causes that aren't genetically supposed to happen. Look at extreme mental and physical retardation in babies. Is this a gene used to help the human race? Insulting example, but I'm just saying that some things in nature aren't perfect.

If homosexuality is a genetic advantage for a species and you are right, I don't think population control would be the reason. Humans thrive in numbers. I think it would be to help balance out the playing field, making sure everyone has a partner and nothing more. Like if a mother made too many males and they were all straight, things might get too hectic.
I appreciate your point of view and this healthy discussion.
I will say, Genetics can be a product of mother nature fine tuning things...or a freak of mother nature...which begs to argue that you originally saying it is an abnormally is also possible. Yet, in the nature of evolution, the strongest survive. Mutations survive only if strong enough...evolution mutates....evolves....so in the genetics of mental retardation....what caused it? and why? Was the parents on drugs? Did the mother drink? ETC ETC ETC...OR was their a recessive gene that was a dormant and this being the end result....or did both parents carry the recessive gene that caused the retardation with the right conditions. (1 in 10000000 chance therory).

It goes to show, did both parents have an recessive gene with homosexuality that was dormant....who knows.....but could be used in both arguments....Evolutionally Defect Or Intent?


TOONICE
 
 
     
 
 
Old Oct 1, 2007, 08:48 AM   #27  
Full Member
americangayboy is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 220
americangayboy See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
It's interesting that you bring this up, because there has been a sex-linked patern of sexual orientation observed in regards to male sexuality. Meaning that for this variable, only the mother would contribute to it.
 
 
     
 
 
Old Oct 4, 2007, 02:35 PM   #28  
Ultra Member
N0help4u is offline
 
N0help4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: dark side of moon, Pa
Posts: 9,681
N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Send a message via Yahoo to N0help4u
Americangayboy -I dont' think anyone who has taken even one research oriented class thinks it comes down to the nature vs nuture debate

I agree When I was in the 8th grade and first learned about nature vs nurture my reply was why does it have to be vs and not something working together?
 
 
     
 
 
Old Oct 28, 2007, 11:12 PM   #29  
Junior Member
ky37m is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 35
ky37m See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gallivant_fellow
There is an extra hormone or something that makes a females into a males. It is thought that some mothers produce antibodies that attack the hormone, leaving some males not fully developed. It is supposed to be extremely common that the last boy born is most likely going to be the gay one if there is a gay in the family. The reason could be that the mother's antibodies against the male hormones grow too strong over the course of having many sons.

I've seen a book about it on TV recently and I've read some stuff too. Maybe this is the cause.
this is very interesting! i would love to hear more. i have 8 siblings. i am the last of the boys and yes i am gay. i realized that i was attracted to other guys about 2 months shy of my 10th birthday. since then, i have spent everyday trying to be straight so that i would be considered normal by society. btw, i am so through with that. so now, im kind of on a journey , trying to be comfortable in my own shell. any thoughts or ideas would be really helpful.
 
 
     


Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors




Copyright ©2003 - 2007, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:38 PM.