Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
Answer   ||    Advanced Search

Ask your question or search...
International Sites: Nederlandse experts vragen
User Name 
Password 
Join   Forgot password? 

Home > Science > Mathematics   »   Transpose a formula for the volume of a box

Question
 
 
#1  
Old Apr 23, 2009, 11:06 AM
stuphi
New Member
stuphi is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1
stuphi See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Transpose a formula for the volume of a box

Hi,

I want to make a box with the relationship between the three dimensions based on the Golden Ratio, . The problem is, I need to find the sizes for the external dimensions based on a set volume.

= shortest side



If we say is the material thickness I can calculate the volume of a known size box by the following formula



What I am struggling to do is transpose that lot to give me the size of the box for a given volume. So far, I have replaced and and got this



That structure looks like it should be familiar, but I cant think what I need to do to get this in the form of whatever. Any help would be appreciated.

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Apr 25, 2009, 01:59 AM   #2  
Accounting Expert
ROLCAM is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: sydney australia
Posts: 1,022
ROLCAM See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
As you know the Golden Ratio is 1.618.

The approximation I am going to suggest
for your purpose is a box of volume 1620
which is very close.
This would give you the following sizes.
9 * 12 * 15 = 1620
The shortest side being 9.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 27, 2009, 12:19 PM   #3  
-
Zazonker is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 126
Zazonker See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Well, what you have here is a 3rd order equation in 3 variables. Not a pretty thing. A mathemation might have fun with it, but an engineer's approach is how can I get the correct answer in a reasonable way. (Apologies to my old math professors, if any are still around).

Looking at your problem definition, you really don't have 3 variables. You are using the golden ratio as a variable, but it is a constant -- a known number and thus it's square is also a known number. That gets you to a 3rd order equation in 2 variables, closer but still no cigar. If you'd allow that in a given situation you would know the thickness of available materials, you could make t a constant - and solve individually for different values of t. That's what I would do (actually, I might just set up a table in excel, which would be quicker than solving the equation).

But, for the solution to 3 decimal points:
Golden ratio = 1.618; squared = 2.618
a = shortest side
b= 1.618 *a
c= 2.618*a
t= thickness of material

V=(a-2t) * (1.618a - 2t) * (2.618a - 2t)

multiplying (first, the first two)

V= (1.618 a^2 - 5.236 at + 4T^2) * (2.618a - 2t)

finally:

V= 4.236 a^3 - 16.944 a^2*t + 20.944 at^2 -8t^3

I left out the combining terms steps (1 in each multiplication) because I assume you know how to do that.

So, now you just pick a value for the thickness of your material, adjust the constants for that value and you have a solvable cubic equation. You can then plug whatever value you want for V and solve for a.The solution to the cubic equation will give the 3 possible mathematical values for a, but only one will make sense.

You then calculate b and c by applying the golden ratio and its square. To check your answer, subtract double the thickness from each and multiply the three results together to check that this equals your target volume.

A couple of examples:
Let t=1
then
V= 4.236 a^3 - 16.944a^2 + 20.944a -8

pick a value for V and solve for a:
For V=100
a=4.249 ----- minus 2, equals 2.249
b=4.249*1.618=6.875 -------minus 2, equals 4.875
c=4.249*2.618=11.124-------minus 2, equals 9.124

Actual V = 2.249*4.875*9.124 = 100.034

If that isn't accurate enough for you, use more decimal points. This should work for all values of V

Another example:
Let t=.5
then
V= 4.236a^3 - 8.472 a^2 +5.236 a -1
For V=1,000
a=6.852 ----- minus 1, equals 5.852
b=6.852*1.618=11.087-------minus 1, equals 10.087
c=6.852*2.618=17.939-------minus 1, equals 16.939

Actual V = 5.852*10.087*16.939 = 999.893

Comments on this post
Perito agrees: Good information.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 28, 2009, 01:37 PM   #4  
Über Member
Stratmando is offline
 
Stratmando's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Florida Keys
Posts: 6,265
Stratmando See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Stratmando See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Stratmando See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
If the box was a cube, would 1 side be the root of the cube?
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 28, 2009, 02:03 PM   #5  
-
Zazonker is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 126
Zazonker See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Well, his initial definition stated the ratio of the sides as 1golden ratio)golden ratio squared). That is a rectangular solid not a cube.

If you had a different problem definition, which I think is what you are saying, of find the external dimension(s) of a cube made of a material with thickness t given a desired internal volume V, it is a much simpler problem.

The internal dimensions (a) would be equal to the cube root of V and the external dimension(s) would be a+2t.

If you actually want to build it, this doesn't give you the size to cut all of the pieces. You'd need 4 pieces cut to a and 2 pieces cut to a+2t - unless you want to get fancy and bevel the edges so all 6 pieces are the same.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 28, 2009, 02:21 PM   #6  
-
Zazonker is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 126
Zazonker See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Oops, that's 2 sides "a", 2 sides "a+2t", and 2 sides that are rectangles "a by "a+2t".
  Reply With Quote
 
     

Your Answer
Email me when someone replies to my answer
Join Login



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Ask your question or search...



Similar Threads
transpose this formula
(2 replies)
How to transpose formula
(1 replies)
transpose this formula in terms of h?
(2 replies)
transpose this formula in terms of u?
(1 replies)
formula for finding volume and surface area
(1 replies)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Search this Thread

Advanced Search

Bookmarks





Copyright ©2003 - 2009, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:41 PM.