Question
 | |  | | | | 
Jun 28, 2006, 05:48 PM
|  | Relationship Expert | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Space Is The Place
Posts: 15,850
| | | Should assisted suicide be a crime! The anguish of those suffering a terminal illness and debilitating pain have led some to ask for help in ending their lives and the pain. Most states frown on helping bring peace to the suffering and the most famous Dr Kevorkian finally went to jail for his part in ending the pain/suffering of those that contacted him. Should we not take into account that we cannot do for these people and help them die if they ask? | | | | | | |
Answers
 | |  | | |
Apr 17, 2007, 04:29 AM
|
#51
| | Relationship Expert
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Space Is The Place
Posts: 15,850
| Even though Dr. Kevorkian went to jail, everyone he was involved with thanked him for his help, and as a fact the families called him. Sounds like they were sure of what had to be done. I think everyone should have the choice of dying with dignity and not suffer thru pain and misery to die anyway. |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Apr 17, 2007, 05:59 AM
|
#52
| | Ultra Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: In the dog house
Posts: 3,600
| I agree completely T-Man. Dr. Kevorkian was unfairly and unnecessarily vilified. I think it takes a great deal of courage to do what that man did. He truly took his hippocratic oath to heart. He became the voice for these people and many more. The fact that he was found guilty and sent to prison shows me how the line is most definitely blurred when it comes to separation of church and state. |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Apr 17, 2007, 10:53 AM
|
#53
| | New Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
| Quote: | Originally Posted by RubyPitbull Although I agree with your second paragraph, the creation of Living Wills and Healthcare Proxies are specifically for that purpose, I do not fully agree with your first paragraph. If a person is physically capable of ending their own life, then yes, it is selfishness to ask someone else to do this for you. Personally, I was not speaking about that. I am speaking about people who have deteriorated to the point in which they cannot just give themselves an overdose of morphine, or whatever else may be available to them. Lou Gehrig's disease is a physically degenerative disease. Most cancers will lead you to the point of no return, in which you cannot physically give yourself the killer dose. That is what I am referring to. As long as someone is physically able to move around on their own, they may still hold out hope and do not want to die. I am talking about when they get to the point where they hit the "point of no return" and are still hanging on, in pain. Why should they be placed in a position where the pain is so unendurable. That does happen to people and they are left for days, weeks, a month or so, in excruciating agony.
I know for myself, after watching enough people go through this, I don't want to be left hanging on, in diapers, unable to move. But, I don't think I have it in me to give up hope if I am able to move about freely. It is only when my body has betrayed me, I am still cognizant, and I am in such pain, that I would want to enforce the law that has been passed for my benefit. It allows me freedom of choice, with the help of my doctor, that I would not otherwise have. If you have ever seen anyone go through this kind of agony, you will have an understanding of exactly what I am saying. | I do understand what you're saying, and that is what wills are for. Or even if you can't put that situation in a will, you could talk to one of your loved ones, or even a nurse, and spell out the specific details you mentioned. Hence, if the person in question is going through a physical ailment, assisted suicide should and must be allowed. |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Apr 17, 2007, 11:01 AM
|
#54
| | Ultra Member
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: In the dog house
Posts: 3,600
| I appreciate that you understand what I am saying, and that you agree assisted suicide should and must be allowed. But regarding wills, no, it doesn't cover it. Wills are followed after someone dies, not before. Living wills are used when someone is unconscious, not conscious. That is why I suggested a specific assisted suicide law. As it stands now, if you speak to someone you love, or a nurse, and they follow your wishes, they can be arrested and charged with murder. Which is exactly what happened to Kevorkian. |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
May 5, 2007, 08:48 AM
|
#55
| | New Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2
| fully agree. when they feel that there is no hope,and the pain is too much then assisting is good |
| | | | | | | | Question Tools | Search this Question | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |