At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them
answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in
answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you
will be able to:
Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+
topics.
ok maybe this isn't a question and I may be the only one person that uses this site that thinks this... I think that the gov. lies all the time. 9-11, they have machines that track the planes and if it heads toward a building are structure they target a missile to blow the plane up... I know the people in the plane would have died, but thats way better than having a hundred more die... Taxes, it says in the constitution or bill of rights that only people in a certain area and the gov. are supposed to pay, they just take advantage of the people that know nothing and wont do a thing to stop it... Did we really go to the moon or was it fake, because if we did go to the moon how come we can't do it again, plus we have better technology. anyways thats just some of the things I severely oppose...
government lies---what else is new
9/11 ---I think they didn't want to see it coming
going to the moon fake ---no
they are going to other places and doing other things now
Mars, satellites, etc...
I don't think anyone will question that the government lies to the public. There are so many layers of secrets and hidden truths that we would be appalled if we really knew. It might scare us to death, if we really knew.
That being said, man did go to the Moon. Not fake. We have gone further than the Moon too and continue to spend billions for who knows why? Billions that could be spent in health care, education, housing, etc. But that is a whole different topic.
You are "opposed against the government"? It seems to me you could be "opposed to the government," or maybe "against the government," but to be "opposed against the government" means you're actually for the government - right?
I bet you also believe there was a shooter on the grassy knoll, FDR started WWII, the CIA shot down flight KAL007, and you're in touch with an African prince who wants to send you a miilion dollars.
Ok about the government. Fake a$$e$ they lie threw there teeth for people to agree with them on issues at hand.
Going to the moon. I say fake. I will say they have made progress to being TO the moon, but to say they made a steep on the moon. NO.
About 9-11 well. Sade .. I will add that if they could of shoot down the planes then they would if had a bigger mess and again the people would still blame the government for not doing there job. That's if they could shoot down a plane above a city.
[quote=ebaines]You are "opposed against the government"? It seems to me you could be "opposed to the government," or maybe "against the government," but to be "opposed against the government" means you're actually for the government - right?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ebaines
I bet you also believe there was a shooter on the grassy knoll
--there was
Quote:
Originally Posted by ebaines
FDR started WWII
--No way!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by ebaines
the CIA shot down flight KAL007
--never trust the CIA
Quote:
Originally Posted by ebaines
and you're in touch with an African prince who wants to send you a miilion dollars .
Ok about the government. Fake a$$e$ they lie threw there teeth for people to agree with them on issues at hand.
Going to the moon. I say fake. I will say they have made progress to being TO the moon, but to say they made a steep on the moon. NO.
About 9-11 well. Sade .. I will add that if they could of shoot down the planes then they would if had a bigger mess and again the people would still blame the government for not doing there job. That's if they could shoot down a plane above a city.
Thats what me and my boyz think as well. The government is F'ed Up.
they have machines that track the planes and if it heads toward a building are structure they target a missile to blow the plane up...
So you honestly think anyone would shoot a missile at a plane over the most heavily populated city in the U.S? Suppose the plane was experiencing a mechanical defect and wasn't deliberately aimed at a building? Don't you think that'd have to be taken into consideration before issuing an order to fire on it? I don't doubt that there are times that the government is less than honest but if you seriously belive that anyone would be legitimately ordered to fire on a civilian aircraft over a heavily populated area because it had apparently strayed from its normal flight path then you've believed some much bigger lies than the government ever spewed.