Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help !
Ask

Draft is back! 18 to 42 men and women

Asked Jun 7, 2006, 05:59 AM — 14 Answers
For those who missed the news:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill...bill=h109-4752


109TH CONGRESS
H. Are. 4752
2D SESSION


To provide for the common defense by requiring all persons in the United
States, including women, between the ages of 18 and 42 to perform
a period of military service or a period of civilian service in furtherance
of the national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes.

14 Answers
NeedKarma's Avatar
NeedKarma Posts: 10,230, Reputation: 8855
Uber Member
 
#2

Jun 7, 2006, 06:06 AM
Welcome to Canada!
Helpful  (1)
mr.yet's Avatar
mr.yet Posts: 1,726, Reputation: 919
Ultra Member
 
#3

Jun 7, 2006, 07:12 AM
NeedKarma, you may want to post property rentals in you area!
Helpful
NeedKarma's Avatar
NeedKarma Posts: 10,230, Reputation: 8855
Uber Member
 
#4

Jun 7, 2006, 08:47 AM
I had a chance to read the bill and it's about compulsory 2 year military duty for everyone just like they have in many countries in Europe. I didn't get as far as to if your job gets saved for you but I doubt this would go over well with the current consumerism trend in americans: "You mean I have to give up my $150,000/year job to do army stuff?" or "What's going to happen to my kickass eBay business while I'm away?"
Helpful
Nez's Avatar
Nez Posts: 570, Reputation: 258
Senior Member
 
#5

Jun 7, 2006, 09:20 AM
My God.If all the guys in the States get drafted,and sent to some backwater,no more Microsoft,Apple,or Google...oh well..world domination by Linux...now I see a plan....
Helpful  (1)
orange's Avatar
orange Posts: 1,450, Reputation: 996
Ultra Member
 
#6

Jun 7, 2006, 12:09 PM
Women too? Are women who are caring for children exempt? If a woman is drafted, will the US government pay for child care?
Helpful
valinors_sorrow's Avatar
valinors_sorrow Posts: 3,034, Reputation: 3328
Ultra Member
 
#7

Jun 7, 2006, 12:24 PM
I have yet to be able to substantiate this as real...
What I mean by that is "active". The closest I get is several sources, each on opposite sides, saying a politically motivated bill was voted down yesterday 402-2, and it wasn't meant as seriously viable to begin with and then a lot of others sites claiming it was bogus or meant to be. Ah, the Age of Misinformation!

http://home.netcom.com/~speaker8/jim..._bill_hoax.htm

http://64.233.179.104/search?q=cache...&ct=clnk&cd=10
Helpful
mr.yet's Avatar
mr.yet Posts: 1,726, Reputation: 919
Ultra Member
 
#8

Jun 7, 2006, 12:48 PM
From the Library of Congress

Universal National Service Act of 2006 (Introduced in House)

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 14, 2006


Link:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/...H.are.4752.IH:

CAll Senators and representatives tell to to vote against this.
Helpful
orange's Avatar
orange Posts: 1,450, Reputation: 996
Ultra Member
 
#9

Jun 7, 2006, 01:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by valinors_sorrow
I have yet to be able to substantiate this as real...
What I mean by that is "active". The closest I get is several sources, each on opposite sides, saying a politically motivated bill was voted down yesterday, 402-2, and it wasn't meant as seriously viable to begin with and then a lot of others sites claiming it was bogus or meant to be. Ah, the Age of Misinformation!
Phew! I certainly hope you are right that this is NOT true, because otherwise what's going to happen to all the children of women who do military service?
Helpful
NeedKarma's Avatar
NeedKarma Posts: 10,230, Reputation: 8855
Uber Member
 
#10

Jun 7, 2006, 01:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by valinors_sorrow
I have yet to be able to substantiate this as real...
What I mean by that is "active". The closest I get is several sources, each on opposite sides, saying a politically motivated bill was voted down yesterday, 402-2, and it wasn't meant as seriously viable to begin with and then a lot of others sites claiming it was bogus or meant to be. Ah, the Age of Misinformation!
The links in this thread are not credible to you?

Your links:
http://home.netcom.com/~speaker8/jim..._bill_hoax.htm --> dated October 6, 2004

http://64.233.179.104/search?q=cache...&ct=clnk&cd=10 --> 5 October 2004 (from a site that does not register a domain name)

I believe this is a different bill.
Helpful

Not your question? Ask your question View similar questions

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Add your answer here.

Remove Text Formatting

Undo
Redo
 
Decrease Size
Increase Size
Bold
Italic
Underline
Align Left
Align Center
Align Right
Ordered List
Unordered List
Decrease Indent
Increase Indent
Insert Email Link
Wrap [QUOTE] tags around selected text
Wrap [CODE] tags around selected text
Wrap [HTML] tags around selected text
Wrap [PHP] tags around selected text
Wrap [YOUTUBE] tags around selected text
Notification Type:



Check out some similar questions!

Low cold water pressure in 2 showers.... Not back to back config however [ 8 Answers ]

My home is 16 years old, I've had it for 5 years. I am on a pump - with 70LBS high cutoff and 55lbs Low turn on. All copper - I have 2 Delta 1600 shower faucets - one tub spicket with shower diverter - one shower only. The tub/shower combo has allways had only a trickle of cold water and...

Back draft preventers [ 2 Answers ]

Anyone know where I can get roof vent back draft preventers to fit 4" PVC?

Women basketball [ 3 Answers ]

I am a sport coordinator for women's sport in Los Angeles. I am putting a women's Basketball league, it will be $250 per team, if anyone out there know of anyone or team who is interested in playing you just reply to this post and I will get you more detail. :)

Women [ 3 Answers ]

My roommate is so lazy its sick. If it doesn't come easy he won't do it. But the women seem to like him. Don't know why. He's even scared to go and talk to them. I don't think I'm the cutest guy by far, but I don't think I look that bad either. I not afraid to talk to women. But for some odd...


View more Government questions Search