Question
 | |  | | | 
Jan 5, 2007, 02:09 AM
|  | Science Expert | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: UK
Posts: 4,729
| | | Posts with 0 replies I realise that the most recent posts with 0 replies are listed on the left on the ASK page, is there a way to get them up in the same format as if you hit the ANSWER button?
I'm aware that i'm probably missing something blindingly obvious.
(those 5 words with over 7 letters each put together like that hurts my brain) | | | | | | |
Answers
 | |  | | |
Jan 5, 2007, 02:11 AM
|
#2
| | Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Behind You !!
Posts: 6,563
Pay to call Curlyben for advice ($1/min) | ANSWER takes you to the most current questions listed in date/time order.
If you want the Zero response Q's in a similar order then you'll have to play around with Advanced search  |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Jan 5, 2007, 02:13 AM
|
#3
| | Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Cave 4, Qumran
Posts: 6,988
| Yes. It's the Unanswered Questions link at the bottom of every page.
The pane to the left on the homepage is just the last 10 of them.
The "Answer" link is all posts (including new questions and responses to questions regardless of their age) from the past 24 hours. |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Jan 5, 2007, 02:18 AM
|
#4
| | Science Expert
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: UK
Posts: 4,729
| Fantastic Rick, that unanswered questions link was just waht i was looking for (I think I had found it before, but forgotten about it) |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Jan 5, 2007, 06:24 AM
|
#5
| | Dogs Expert
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Northern US
Posts: 10,609
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by Capuchin I don't think they eat them for calcium. But they normally end up swallowing them just because of the construction of their mouth, and their teeth are fairly small that it causes them no trouble. They cant really control it enough to not swallow them.
But I don't think they get useful calcium out of them...
I'm no expert so I may be wrong here  | ''I'm no expert so I may be wrong here'' If so, why did you track down a question only 19 minutes old in a forum that has several active, knowledgeable people? I don't think people come here for guess work from people knowing little more about the question than the OP. There are forums where it is mostly opinions, and one opinion is as good as another. Other forums there are factual answers from trained, experienced people.
I let most of the questions go unanswered in Plumbing, Electrical and Lighting, and Heating and Cooling. I have acquired above average knowledge of those areas one way or another and at one time was answering many questions there. However, we now have people that know much more than I do in those areas. I feel people will appreciate waiting for a reliable answer, and leave them unanswered. I would thank others to do the same in the Dog forum. |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Jan 5, 2007, 10:32 AM
|
#6
| | Science Expert
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: UK
Posts: 4,729
| Apologies if you were offended. I googled for a good 10 minutes around sites to see whether puppies did eat their own teeth and found many references about them swallowing or eating their teeth.
Even though I didnt state so, I also used my own knowledge of whether an animal's digestive system would break down and absorb the calcium in a useful way.
It was an educated guess that I was sure was correct without going too deep, so the OP would be put to rest if they came back to the thread before anyone else had a chance to get to it. I was completely satisfied that you may come along later and completely debunk me, but I did the research and was satisfied with the answer I gave.
I meant no offense at all and i'm sorry if i caused some. |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Jan 5, 2007, 10:34 AM
|
#7
| | Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Cave 4, Qumran
Posts: 6,988
| That's no problem. I too often look for answers when I see a question that interests me but I'm not knowledgable about. |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Jan 5, 2007, 01:38 PM
|
#8
| | Dogs Expert
Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Northern US
Posts: 10,609
| There have been instances here of somebody Googling up answers they didn't know enough about dogs to realize were dangerous. I see no reason for anybody to do a search in an area where they know little about when there are good people active in the forum. Dogs may be a more critical area, because so many sites on dogs are put up by kooks with an agenda, and contradict well documented dog information.
There are questions nobody here knows much about, and in a case like that, I don't see it as a problem to do a search. |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Jan 8, 2007, 04:16 PM
|
#9
| | | Computer Expert
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: LI, NY - USA
Posts: 23,862
Pay to call ScottGem for advice ($.75/min) | I'm going weigh in here. I don't think Lab took "offense" at your answering. But I do think that we should all take a care when answering questions that we aren't sure about. Its one thing to respond if a question goes unanswered for an extended period (12 or more hours), but its another to jump on a new question where there are active experts.
Many a time I'll see a question that interests me or I think I can contribute, but I'll wait to see what the experts in that area answer first. This site is not a competition to see how many questions we can answer, nor is it a competition to see who can answer first. Its a service where the quality of the answers should be the paramount concern of all participants. I feel there is still too much bandwagon jumping, people jumping on questions after its already been answered. Sometimes there is valid additional material added. But many times its just a rehash of previous answers.
I'm not trying to criticize Capuchin, instead I'm trying to explain how I think a site like this should operate.
1) Don't answer a question, especially in an area you are not expert in, unless you are 100% sure of your answer.
2) Don't jump to answer a new question in an area outside your expertise. Wait for the forum experts to weigh in
3) Don't pile on with responses when the question has already been answered. There are two expections to this; 1) where its an opinion type issue, in that case reinforcing other's opinions is applicable 2) where you can add something substantative to previous answers.
I think those guidelines should be part of the the site guidelines on answering questions. |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Jan 8, 2007, 05:19 PM
|
#10
| | Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Cave 4, Qumran
Posts: 6,988
| Opinions and answers are valued here, but none are necessarily the wishes of the site owners or administrators. The way this site operates is to permit an answer by any registered member. The above answers are, in my opinion, good ones, but not requirements of this site. |
| | | | | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |