Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
  Advanced
Register  |  Log in  
   Ask    
 Answer  
  Help  

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Arts & Leisure > Sports > Football (American)   »   intentional grounding rule

 
Question Tools Search this Question Display Modes
Question
 
 
#1  
Old Jan 16, 2008, 09:38 AM
bevenourb
New Member
bevenourb is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1
bevenourb See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
intentional grounding rule

Why is there a yardage penalty as well as loss of down imposed for intentional grounding, but not when the QB spikes the ball to stop the clock--he's still inside the tackles at this point. Is it because he is not doing it in anticipation of a sack? Beth

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Jan 17, 2008, 07:22 AM   #2  
George_1950
Ultra Member
George_1950 is offline
 
George_1950's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,380
George_1950 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.George_1950 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Send a message via Yahoo to George_1950
spiking the ball to stop the clock is a legal play; intentional grounding is an illegal play. Loss of down and yardage penalty is the worst type of penalty, and yes, it is because the QB is attempting to avoid a sack.
  Reply With Quote
 
     


Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors

Similar Questions
Question Asker Topic Answers Last Post
No Contact Rule. 4answers Relationships 28 Apr 6, 2008 03:40 PM
any criminal items, intentional infliction of emotional distress, or too minor? makdan Criminal Law 2 Dec 28, 2007 10:09 AM
Does this qualify as either criminal or intentional infliction of emotional distress? makdan Family Law 0 Dec 26, 2007 06:16 PM
rule 72 NBishop Finance 0 Oct 31, 2007 03:38 PM
no contact rule stoudemire123 Dating 3 Jun 14, 2007 08:15 PM




Copyright ©2003 - 2007, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:04 PM.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.