Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
  Advanced
Register  |  Log in  
   Ask    
 Answer  
  Help  

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Law > Family Law   »   One more custody law proposed amendment; for now.

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Question
 
 
#1  
Old Jul 26, 2007, 05:23 PM
XenoSapien
Senior Member
XenoSapien is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 628
XenoSapien See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
One more custody law proposed amendment; for now.

--The putative father should have the right to submit to the judge that they have or may have gotten a woman pregnant, and wish to prevent an abortion attempt by the mother. Pending DNA after the putative fathers request is accepted, should have the right to put a stop on any abortion attempt by the mother.

Right or wrong?

XenoSapien

 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Jul 27, 2007, 03:26 AM   #2  
Family Law Expert
GV70 is offline
 
GV70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: In the middle of nowhere
Posts: 976
GV70 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
As a christian I believe in that abortion / with or without putative father's consent / is murder.
 
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 27, 2007, 05:09 AM   #3  
Adult Sexuality Expert
Synnen is offline
 
Synnen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,412
Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
As a woman who had a teen pregnancy where the father didn't stick around....I think it should be the woman's choice entirely.

HOWEVER: When medical technology catches up to the point where men are able to carry babies in some sort of surrogate womb (in other words, go through pregnancy), I think they then should have the right to have that egg transferred to their own bodies. Until then, I think that it should remain the mother's choice.

By the way...since I don't think that DNA testing can't be done on a fetus that young in utero (please...corrections if I'm wrong would be great), I think there is NO WAY that a man should be able to prevent an abortion just by saying the kid is his. Do you realize how many idiots would be stepping forward JUST to prevent an abortion--possibly for a woman he doesn't even know? Until men can take on the pregnancy and everything that goes with it, they'll have to wait to have a say in that choice.
 
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 27, 2007, 05:27 AM   #4  
Ultra Member
NeedKarma is online now
 
NeedKarma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Online
Posts: 6,400
NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
How many threads have you read here where people's lives are ruined by a child that was not wanted? Perhaps it's a good thing that the woman would want to abort.
 
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 27, 2007, 05:30 AM   #5  
J_9
Health Expert
J_9 is offline
 
J_9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: La La Land
Posts: 20,019
J_9 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.J_9 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.J_9 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.J_9 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.J_9 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.J_9 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.J_9 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.J_9 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.J_9 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.J_9 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.J_9 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Call J_9 via Skype™
The only testing that can be done in utero is an amneocentesis, since that is a very dangerous procedure that can possibly result in miscarriage, I do not think it will ever be done for paternity testing, many women, the men you speak of, and the doctors involved will not submit to that form of DNA test. The test itself can be brutal (especially if afraid of needles).

So, since the woman carries the baby, goes through the hormonal mood swings, and has to endure labor and delivery, it will remain her choice until we see the day that Synn speaks of. I don't see that happening in the near future.

Sorry Xeno, your theory has too many holes to hold water.
 
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 27, 2007, 08:24 PM   #6  
Ultra Member
froggy7 is offline
 
froggy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,811
froggy7 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.froggy7 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.froggy7 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I agree with Synnen. The baby is growing inside the woman's body, which puts her at certain physical risks. You are aware that women still die in childbirth, right? When men have the ability to continue the pregnancy outside a woman's body, then they will be able to ask that the fetus be awarded to them.

Of course, a medical advance like that is sure to have many ripples, and will probably cause a huge culture shift in how family is defined and what rights and obligations are attendent upon parents.
 
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 28, 2007, 04:29 AM   #7  
Senior Member
XenoSapien is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 628
XenoSapien See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I understand it's a woman's body, but nine months compared to the next 50 years or so? A child is NOT just about the first nine months. To say that just because the woman carries the child entitles them to most or total power is a total cop-out. It takes two, doesn't it?

XenoSapien
 
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 28, 2007, 08:09 AM   #8  
Adult Sexuality Expert
Synnen is offline
 
Synnen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,412
Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Xeno...if a guy doesn't want a child (and really, this applies to women too, but that's beside the point) he should KEEP IT IN HIS PANTS. Period.

You have no idea how hard that nine months is. You have no idea the changes it makes to your body, you emotions, your decision making process...NONE of that.

When you (or any man) can carry baby weight the rest of his life, or FEEL a baby move inside you, or have morning sickness or really and truly understand what those 9 months are like...THEN you can make decisions regarding that fetus.

Until then....your ideas are really pretty insane.
 
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 28, 2007, 08:20 AM   #9  
Senior Member
Nosnosna is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: East bumble, TN
Posts: 434
Nosnosna See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Asinine on its face.

For this to be even considered, we'll have to add in a few things:

Father accepts 100% responsibility for the child, financial and otherwise, from birth on.
Father immediately pays all medical costs in the pregnancy and delivery, up front. Father immediately disclaims any right to public assistance for the life of the child. Violate any of this, and he loses all rights to the child permanently, but is required to pay child support. Should anything happen to the mother during or as a result of the pregnancy, the father is 100% liable for it, criminally and financially. This means that if the mother dies in childbirth, we have first degree murder.

Amazingly, all of this is still more reasonable than the original suggestion.
 
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 28, 2007, 11:18 AM   #10  
Senior Member
XenoSapien is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 628
XenoSapien See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Synnen
Xeno...if a guy doesn't want a child (and really, this applies to women too, but that's beside the point) he should KEEP IT IN HIS PANTS. Period.

You have no idea how hard that nine months is. You have no idea the changes it makes to your body, you emotions, your decision making process...NONE of that.

When you (or any man) can carry baby weight the rest of his life, or FEEL a baby move inside you, or have morning sickness or really and truly understand what those 9 months are like...THEN you can make decisions regarding that fetus.

Until then....your ideas are really pretty insane.
Again, nine months compared to the horrors that child will be exposed to for the next fifty years does not compare. That pain was God's idea, not MEN. So to punish them is insane.

XenoSapien
 
 
     

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors

Similar Threads
Question Asker Forum Answers Last Post
How about this custody law proposed amendment? XenoSapien Family Law 15 Jul 28, 2007 03:29 PM
custody law ortizlundquist Family Law 2 Jun 19, 2007 06:16 PM
New Law Passed on Move Away Custody Issues MFish1000 Family Law 2 Feb 16, 2006 03:13 PM
NH Custody Law regarding Moving? thejamanimal Family Law 3 Jan 22, 2006 12:42 PM
New Hampshire Child Custody Law KrashesGirl Children 5 Jan 30, 2005 03:01 PM




Copyright ©2003 - 2007, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:53 AM.