Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
  Advanced
Register  |  Log in  
   Ask    
 Answer  
  Help  

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Law > Family Law   »   Inheritance law in California

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Question
 
 
#1  
Old Nov 18, 2006, 08:17 AM
reviewer46
New Member
reviewer46 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1
reviewer46 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Inheritance law in California

Should a parent who is preparing a revokable trust document name the spouse(s) of the children that would 'inherit' property when the parent dies? If only the children of the parent are named, does the spouse of any child have a claim if s/he is not named in the document?
Example: a mother, age 85, has two children, a son 50 and a daughter 60; the son is married, the daughter is divorced. She wants her shildren to share equally in her estate when she passes on. When the mother prepares the revokable trust document, should she specifiy a 50-50 percentage split between the son and the daughter or should she specify 50% for the daughter, and split the remaining 50% between the son and the daughter-in-law? If the daughter-in-law is not named in the document, would she still have a claim against the property at some later date (in divorce proceedings, or when the property is sold, etc.)?

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Nov 18, 2006, 08:41 AM   #2  
Expert
excon is offline
 
excon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: On the outside
Posts: 9,563
excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Hello reviewer:

I'm assuming that we're not talking about chump change here. These are complicated legal questions that are well beyong the scope of an internet legal site. You need the services of an attorney.

In addition to the obvious ones, the benefit of hiring your own attorney is, if he's wrong, you can sue him. If I'M wrong (or anyone else here), then you should have known better than to take financial planning advice from an exconvict.

excon
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Nov 18, 2006, 03:00 PM   #3  
Christianity Expert
Fr_Chuck is offline
 
Fr_Chuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 29,150
Fr_Chuck has disabled reputation
The answer is, it depends on the wording on how the children are listed, or if you include a note of thier heirs or name who gets thier share if preceded in death.

As excon mentioned, a trust has to be worded exact, or they can be contested in court after your death. ( and god only knows how nasty people get to fight over someones money)

Hire a great attorney and do it right the first time.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Nov 19, 2006, 03:04 PM   #4  
Ultra Member
s_cianci is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Eastern Seaboard - USA
Posts: 4,545
s_cianci See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.s_cianci See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.s_cianci See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.s_cianci See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.s_cianci See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.s_cianci See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Unless you plan in advance to avoid any such ambiguity, a spouse might try to stake a claim in the event one of your primary beneficiaries (i.e. your children) pre-deceases you, his/her sibling and his/her spouse. If you don't want a surviving spouse to have a claim, provide for an alternative distribution of your assets and specify that if one of your children predeceases you, the surviving sibling then gets 100%. Then designate a secondary beneficiary, such as another family member, should the surviving child also predecease you.
  Reply With Quote
 
     

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors

Similar Threads
Question Asker Forum Answers Last Post
California inheritance law? AmyEmmert Other Law 3 Nov 17, 2007 02:07 PM
California condominium law Etiels Real Estate Law 4 Oct 24, 2006 03:38 PM
California Law Question... fshay1 Other Law 11 Sep 20, 2006 09:15 AM
California Condo law 3825 Real Estate Law 1 Aug 4, 2006 09:45 AM
California inheritance pdexer62 Family Law 2 May 2, 2006 05:03 PM




Copyright ©2003 - 2007, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:55 AM.