Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
  Advanced
Register  |  Log in  

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Law > Family Law   »   Boyfriend may have a daughter

Answer this Question
Ask about Family Law
 
Question Tools Search this Question Display Modes
Question
 
 
#1  
Old Apr 22, 2008, 07:33 AM
aliaricam3
Junior Member
aliaricam3 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 35
aliaricam3 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Boyfriend may have a daughter

Hello, My boyfriend and I have been together for eight years and have 2 children together, we both work but are struggling to make ends meet, He also has a child support order for his oldest son. A woman is now coming out and asking him for a paternity test for her 12 year old daughter because the father got a test last year and found out it was not his child after caring for her and paying child support one other guy was tested and he is not the father so now my boyfriend has to go get a test next week, This womans name is listed on his child support as parent to receive support (My boyfriends current order for other son has her name as well ,). He also received a letter that if this child is his he will have to pay back support to her and the welfare system because she was on welfare, I am all for a parent paying support but why should he have to pay back welfare for her if this is his child (she does resemble our son).

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Apr 22, 2008, 07:37 AM   #2  
Synnen
Adult Sexuality Expert
Synnen is offline
 
Synnen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,976
Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Why should the taxpayers have to carry the burden of support if she was on Welfare?

That's the reason. There is absolutely no reason that the public should have to pay for the kid(s) if the parent is able to be located.

Comments on this post
GV70 agrees: yes,of course
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 22, 2008, 07:40 AM   #3  
talaniman
Relationship Expert
talaniman is offline
 
talaniman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Space Is The Place
Posts: 13,545
talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Because thats the law, and back child support still goes for the welfare of the child, and it starts at birth, so if he didn't handle is business at the birth of the child, he must do it now.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 22, 2008, 07:40 AM   #4  
aliaricam3
Junior Member
aliaricam3 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 35
aliaricam3 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Synnen
Why should the taxpayers have to carry the burden of support if she was on Welfare?

That's the reason. There is absolutely no reason that the public should have to pay for the kid(s) if the parent is able to be located.


I understand that completely, but If he had known that he had this child he would of been paying support, this woman is still on welfare to this day (they are actually paying for the paternity test) why does a man that pays support have to pay back welfare for a woman who does not want to work and can not keep track of the men she sleeps with. (I hear she is also pregnat now)
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 22, 2008, 07:59 AM   #5  
Synnen
Adult Sexuality Expert
Synnen is offline
 
Synnen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,976
Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Well, if he thinks she's that bad, he should sue for custody.

Then SHE would be the one that had to pay support.

Basically it comes down to choosing wisely the people you sleep with--and while she can't keep track of who SHE slept with...apparently he stooped low enough to hit that.

The responsibility is that of BOTH parents.

I say again: If you (or the child's father, anyway) do not feel that she is a good enough person to HAVE those kids, then he should sue for custody of the children.

Whining about child support always ticks me off, frankly. I don't like, as a taxpayer, supporting someone else's kids. Especially since I can't get the taxpayers to pay for ME to have a child (the infertility testing and IVF treatments get REALLY expensive).

So...since kids are a "lifestyle choice", then the people who MADE the kids should have the financial hit on their lifestyle.

Or give the kids up for adoption at birth, when they still have a chance of being adopted.

Either way....no whining about it.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 22, 2008, 08:01 AM   #6  
GV70
Family Law Expert
GV70 is offline
 
GV70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: In the middle of nowhere
Posts: 785
GV70 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
where are you in?Whare does that woman?
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 22, 2008, 08:07 AM   #7  
aliaricam3
Junior Member
aliaricam3 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 35
aliaricam3 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Synnen
Well, if he thinks she's that bad, he should sue for custody.

Then SHE would be the one that had to pay support.

Basically it comes down to choosing wisely the people you sleep with--and while she can't keep track of who SHE slept with...apparently he stooped low enough to hit that.

The responsibility is that of BOTH parents.

I say again: If you (or the child's father, anyway) do not feel that she is a good enough person to HAVE those kids, then he should sue for custody of the children.

Whining about child support always ticks me off, frankly. I don't like, as a taxpayer, supporting someone else's kids. Especially since I can't get the taxpayers to pay for ME to have a child (the infertility testing and IVF treatments get REALLY expensive).

So...since kids are a "lifestyle choice", then the people who MADE the kids should have the financial hit on their lifestyle.

Or give the kids up for adoption at birth, when they still have a chance of being adopted.

Either way....no whining about it.



I agree 100% about taking care of your responsibilty, I wonder if the first guy gets his money back seeing the new will have to pay as well (the first one also paid welfare), my question really is how do they add her name to his support order wihout a test yet and if it is his child and they get a court order and she stays on welfare does he still pay the current welfare as well as back.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 22, 2008, 08:15 AM   #8  
aliaricam3
Junior Member
aliaricam3 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 35
aliaricam3 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GV70
where are you in?Whare does that woman?


Massachusetts if that is what you are asking
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 22, 2008, 08:19 AM   #9  
Synnen
Adult Sexuality Expert
Synnen is offline
 
Synnen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,976
Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Synnen See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I would consult a lawyer about whether or not it is legal to add the new child to the support order before paternity is determined.

It sounds like a lawyer might be a good idea in general, with the strange history this woman has.

Comments on this post
beenaroundtheblock agrees: agree 100%
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 22, 2008, 08:20 AM   #10  
stinawords
Junior Member
stinawords is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 124
stinawords See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
The first guy can get his money back if he gets a lawyer and goes to court especially if they do get the right father paying. As far as current welfare goes no he will only have to pay the back amount that he would have been paying in support. When ever she goes in to renew her welfare (every 6 months or so I think) all support payments recieved by her are to be reported because they figure into the amount of assistance she recieves. I do know of a couple women that know how to play the system so in order to protect himself make sure all of his payments are made through the court system and he gets the reciepts from them (they are good about giving reciepts) this way she can't claim she didn't get it. Well, she can claim she didn't but he has the best back up he can get.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
Answer this Question
Ask about Family Law


Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors

Similar Questions
Question Asker Topic Answers Last Post
Is it wrong for me to not trust my ex-boyfriend with our daughter? mommy_25 Family Law 3 Mar 15, 2008 05:43 PM
13 year old daughter kissing boyfriend smrfun357 Dating 9 Jan 24, 2008 12:53 PM
daughter vs new boyfriend BigTmom Children 4 Oct 12, 2007 05:12 PM
custody battle with my boyfriend of our daughter krystal21 Children 5 Jun 30, 2007 07:38 AM
Boyfriend Adopting My Daughter crybaby1210Monty Adoption 2 Mar 12, 2007 05:30 PM




Copyright ©2003 - 2007, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:25 AM.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.