Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
Ask    ||    Answer
 
Advanced  
 

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Forum Community > Member Discussions > Current Events   »   You can put lipstick on a pig...it's still a pig.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Question
 
 
Old Sep 10, 2008, 04:28 AM
RickJ's Avatar
RickJ
Über Member
RickJ is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The Bogs at Windover
Posts: 7,363
RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.RickJ See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
You can put lipstick on a pig...it's still a pig.

How low and pathetic.

I can guess in advance that he will say that he was not referring to Palin.

But smart folk will know this is not true. If Palin would have never made the lipstick comment, then Obama would never have said what he did.


Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Sep 12, 2008, 08:17 AM   #61  
Ultra Member
speechlesstx is offline
 
speechlesstx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 1,096
speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
Who cares?
I get it, hypocrisy and sleaze only count if it comes from the right. Is that it, NK?
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Sep 12, 2008, 09:00 AM   #62  
Über Member
NeedKarma is online now
 
NeedKarma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Online
Posts: 7,586
NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx
I get it, hypocrisy and sleaze only count if it comes from the right. Is that it, NK?
No, I don't care what McCain's friends did decades ago either, it's not relevant.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Sep 12, 2008, 09:51 AM   #63  
Jobs & Parenting Expert
Wondergirl is offline
 
Wondergirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicago - western suburbs
Posts: 8,011
Wondergirl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Wondergirl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Wondergirl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Wondergirl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Wondergirl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Wondergirl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Wondergirl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Wondergirl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Wondergirl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by excon
Bill Ayres was a terrorist 40 years ago.
Ol' Bill grew up in the Chicago suburb just west of me. He and I coulda had pizza together had we known each other back when we were kids.

He didn't get caught, but did turn himself in.

These are his comments regarding terrorist, printed in Wikipedia --

"We weren't terrorists," Ayers told an interviewer for the Chicago Tribune in 2001. "The reason we weren't terrorists is because we did not commit random acts of terror against people. Terrorism was what was being practiced in the countryside of Vietnam by the United States." In a letter to the editor in the Chicago Tribune, Ayers wrote, "I condemn all forms of terrorism — individual, group and official". He also condemned the September 11 terrorist attacks in that letter. "Today we are witnessing crimes against humanity on our own shores on an unthinkable scale, and I fear that we may soon see more innocent people in other parts of the world dying in response."
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Sep 12, 2008, 10:29 AM   #64  
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
tomder55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,682
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Nice distintion .He was waging war on America then as he bomber the NYC Police HQ .

Here is another of his warped definitions explaining why he was not a terrorist :
"Terrorists destroy randomly,"..."while our actions bore ... the precise stamp of a cut diamond. Terrorists intimidate, while we aimed only to educate."

His girl friend died making a nail bomb that would've been detonated at a dance where both soldiers and civilians were to attend . Hundreds of lives could have been lost had the plan been successfully executed. Ayers attested that the bomb would have done serious damage, "tearing through windows and walls and, yes, people too.
"http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2169
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Sep 12, 2008, 12:29 PM   #65  
Senior Member
ETWolverine is offline
 
ETWolverine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 934
ETWolverine See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ETWolverine See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ETWolverine See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skell

EDIT:
Found this link just after posting. Four to one the world wants Obama over McCain. Guess its lucky for a lot of you guys that we dont get a vote.

Either president may disappoint us - Opinion - smh.com.au
Yeah... but who does that include?

It includes Hamas, Hizbolah, Al Qaeda, the PLO, the Taliban, FARC and all the other terrorists. It includes Castro, Chavez, Kim Gong Il, the Chinese leadership and Ahmadinejad.

We should not be basing our presidential choices on what outsiders, including our enemies, would like to see. If our enemies want Obama, it seems pretty clear to me that Obama is the LAST person we should vote for.

Elliot
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Sep 12, 2008, 12:37 PM   #66  
Senior Member
ETWolverine is offline
 
ETWolverine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 934
ETWolverine See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ETWolverine See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ETWolverine See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wondergirl
Ol' Bill grew up in the Chicago suburb just west of me. He and I coulda had pizza together had we known each other back when we were kids.

He didn't get caught, but did turn himself in.

These are his comments regarding terrorist, printed in Wikipedia --

"We weren't terrorists," Ayers told an interviewer for the Chicago Tribune in 2001. "The reason we weren't terrorists is because we did not commit random acts of terror against people. Terrorism was what was being practiced in the countryside of Vietnam by the United States." In a letter to the editor in the Chicago Tribune, Ayers wrote, "I condemn all forms of terrorism — individual, group and official". He also condemned the September 11 terrorist attacks in that letter. "Today we are witnessing crimes against humanity on our own shores on an unthinkable scale, and I fear that we may soon see more innocent people in other parts of the world dying in response."
I dunno... blowing up statues in public parks, blowing up police stations, blowing up military recruiting offices, and blowing up the capitol... aren't these acts of terrorism?

Ayers claims his actions were designed to "educate"?

He was a friggin' university professor. That's his idea of education? What was his curriculum? Plastique 101? How to make home-made pipe bobs? Civil disobedience and violent protest for the 20th Century?

Education TEACHES people. Blowing stuff up KILLS people. Ayers was no educator, regardless of what he calls himself.

Worse, he sympathizes with terrorists, and counts himself as one of them. After the Towers came down on 9-11, Ayers said that the only thing he regretted was that he didn't blow MORE stuff up like the 9-11 terrorists did. HE CONSIDERS HIMSELF ONE OF THEM.

Please don't be so naive, Carol. Ayers is a sick and dangerous man, and a terrorist. He's NOT in the league of an OBL, but only because he incompetent, not for lack of trying. And he's PROUD to be counted among their number.

Elliot
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Sep 12, 2008, 12:41 PM   #67  
Senior Member
ETWolverine is offline
 
ETWolverine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 934
ETWolverine See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ETWolverine See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ETWolverine See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeedKarma
No, I don't care what McCain's friends did decades ago either, it's not relevant.
Actually, it is very relevant. Who a person associates with is indicative of who he takes advice from.

ANd it's hard to question McCains friends... they were all spending their time in the Hanoi Hilton getting the crap kicked out of them by communist enemies of the USA, while Ayers was blowing stuff up back home in sympathy for the guys who were torturing McCain and his buddies.

Associations go DIRECTLY to indicate what a person believes, supports, and takes comfort in. And Obama's associations are DANGEROUS indicators that he is the WRONG MAN FOR THE JOB.

Elliot
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Sep 12, 2008, 12:56 PM   #68  
Senior Member
inthebox is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 782
inthebox See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.inthebox See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ETWolverine
Yeah... but who does that include?

It includes Hamas, Hizbolah, Al Qaeda, the PLO, the Taliban, FARC and all the other terrorists. It includes Castro, Chavez, Kim Gong Il, the Chinese leadership and Ahmadinejad.

We should not be basing our presidential choices on what outsiders, including our enemies, would like to see. If our enemies want Obama, it seems pretty clear to me that Obama is the LAST person we should vote for.

Elliot

If the world is so in love with him , they can have him
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Sep 12, 2008, 03:06 PM   #69  
Jobs & Parenting Expert
Wondergirl is offline
 
Wondergirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicago - western suburbs
Posts: 8,011
Wondergirl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Wondergirl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Wondergirl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Wondergirl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Wondergirl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Wondergirl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Wondergirl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Wondergirl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Wondergirl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ETWolverine
He was a friggin' university professor. That's his idea of education? What was his curriculum? Plastique 101? How to make home-made pipe bobs? Civil disobedience and violent protest for the 20th Century?

Education TEACHES people. Blowing stuff up KILLS people. Ayers was no educator, regardless of what he calls himself.

Worse, he sympathizes with terrorists, and counts himself as one of them. After the Towers came down on 9-11, Ayers said that the only thing he regretted was that he didn't blow MORE stuff up like the 9-11 terrorists did. HE CONSIDERS HIMSELF ONE OF THEM.

Please don't be so naive, Carol. Ayers is a sick and dangerous man, and a terrorist. He's NOT in the league of an OBL, but only because he incompetent, not for lack of trying. And he's PROUD to be counted among their number.

Elliot
IS, Elliiot, IS. Ayers IS a college teacher NOW. He teaches classes in social justice, urban educational reform, narrative and interpretive research, dealing with children in trouble with the law, etc.

Here is a site that lists the books he has written:

William Ayers: Books by William Ayers

Ayers is not "a sick and dangerous man," as you so glowingly phrased it. He is not proud of his past (40 years ago!!!!!!) which occasionally comes back to bite him in the butt, as pasts so often do.

Naive, Elliot? Who's naive? I at least do research on both sides of an issue and read what I have found and weigh the information therein and do my level best not to swallow hook, line, and sinker whatever the party line is.

P.S. And I would be very pleased to eat pizza with Bill Ayers today if I had the chance, Elliot, just as I would be pleased to share one with you.

Here's his blog. Feel free to read it and post a comment:

Bill Ayers Blogspot
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Sep 13, 2008, 08:54 PM   #70  
Senior Member
ETWolverine is offline
 
ETWolverine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 934
ETWolverine See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ETWolverine See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ETWolverine See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wondergirl
Ayers is not "a sick and dangerous man," as you so glowingly phrased it. He is not proud of his past (40 years ago!!!!!!) which occasionally comes back to bite him in the butt, as pasts so often do.

Carol, you are being naive.

Please read this article from the NY Times of 9/11/01.

Here are a few quotes from that article.

''I don't regret setting bombs,'' Bill Ayers said. ''I feel we didn't do enough.''

In his book Mr. Ayers describes the Weathermen descending into a ''whirlpool of violence.'' ''Everything was absolutely ideal on the day I bombed the Pentagon,'' he writes. But then comes a disclaimer: ''Even though I didn't actually bomb the Pentagon -- we bombed it, in the sense that Weathermen organized it and claimed it.'' He goes on to provide details about the manufacture of the bomb and how a woman he calls Anna placed the bomb in a restroom. No one was killed or injured, though damage was extensive.

So, would Mr. Ayers do it all again, he is asked? ''I don't want to discount the possibility,'' he said.

Even today, he finds ''a certain eloquence to bombs, a poetry and a pattern from a safe distance,'' he writes.



This does not sound like a man who is not proud of his past. It, in fact, sounds like a man who is quite proud of his past and wants to in some way recapture the "glory" of his past. It sounds like a man who wishes to continue in the actions of the past. It sounds like someone who CELEBRATES his past.

Bill Ayers is an unrepentant terrorist, a lover of bombs at "a safe distance", and a hater of America.

Ayers' politics haven't changed. Nor have his methods. He is still hell-bent on destroying American capitalism, democracy and "imperialism".

Why you would want to have a pizza with such a person, I have no idea.

Elliot
  Reply With Quote
 
     

Your Answer
Email me when someone replies to my answer
Join Login





Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Similar Threads
Lipstick color.
(2 replies)
lipstick make & color on a music video
(1 replies)
non-smear lipstick
(3 replies)
Lipstick
(1 replies)
When should an old lipstick be thrown out?
(7 replies)

Search this Thread

Advanced Search

Bookmarks

Sponsors



Copyright ©2003 - 2009, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:38 AM.