Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
Ask    ||    Answer
 
  Advanced  
 

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Forum Community > Member Discussions > Current Events   »   Unhinged at the UN

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Question
 
 
#1  
Old Apr 11, 2008, 01:04 PM
speechlesstx's Avatar
speechlesstx
Ultra Member
speechlesstx is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 1,096
speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Unhinged at the UN

The NY Sun reports the unanimous choice to head a new UN Council which will "monitor Israel" and human rights issues in the Israel-Palestinian conflict is calling for "an official commission to study the role neoconservatives may have played in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks."

Quote:
On March 26, Richard Falk, Milbank professor of international law emeritus at Princeton University, was named by unanimous vote to a newly created position to report on human rights in the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs. While Mr. Falk's specialty is human rights and international law, since the attacks in 2001, he has devoted some of his time to challenging what he calls the "9-11 official version."

On March 24 in an interview with a radio host and former University of Wisconsin instructor, Kevin Barrett, Mr. Falk said, "It is possibly true that especially the neoconservatives thought there was a situation in the country and in the world where something had to happen to wake up the American people. Whether they are innocent about the contention that they made that something happen or not, I don't think we can answer definitively at this point. All we can say is there is a lot of grounds for suspicion, there should be an official investigation of the sort the 9/11 commission did not engage in and that the failure to do these things is cheating the American people and in some sense the people of the world of a greater confidence in what really happened than they presently possess."

Mr. Barrett, who is the co-founder of the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth, said in an interview yesterday of Mr. Falk, "I would put him on a list of scholars who are sympathetic to the 9/11 truth movement."

He added, "Unlike most public intellectuals today, he is both honest and very, very knowledgeable in that he understands the probable reality of 9/11. He understands that the evidence that it was a false flag operation is very strong."

The narrative that the attacks from 2001 were a "false flag" operation is a recurring theme in the literature challenging the consensus that 19 Al Qaeda hijackers flew commercial jets into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. False flag refers to espionage or covert actions taken by one government made to seem like the work of another. The false flag thesis has it that the Bush administration is somehow responsible for the September 11 attacks as a pretext for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
LOL, the UN has appointed a lunatic. Not just any lunatic mind you, but a Princeton professor who defended and praised Ayatollah Khomeini and is being charged with working with Israel after comparing "Israel's treatment of Palestinian Arabs to the Nazi treatment of Jews in the holocaust."

Can anyone direct Mr. Falk on where to pick up his official UN tin foil hat?

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Apr 11, 2008, 02:17 PM   #2  
Ultra Member
George_1950 is offline
 
George_1950's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,104
George_1950 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.George_1950 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.George_1950 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Send a message via Yahoo to George_1950
Stay tuned: oliver stone's new movie will disclose all: "...W, which begins filming this month and will be produced at lightening speed. Stone, a director with a keen eye to publicity and no aversion to controversy, is thought to want to bring the movie's 2009 release date forward to push it into cinemas before the November presidential elections and certainly before Bush quits the White House on January 20."
Oliver Stone's new movie about the American president, W, goes beyond a warts-and-all portrayal of George Bush | World news | guardian.co.uk
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 11, 2008, 02:48 PM   #3  
Ultra Member
speechlesstx is offline
 
speechlesstx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 1,096
speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by George_1950
Stay tuned: oliver stone's new movie will disclose all: "...W, which begins filming this month and will be produced at lightening speed. Stone, a director with a keen eye to publicity and no aversion to controversy, is thought to want to bring the movie's 2009 release date forward to push it into cinemas before the November presidential elections and certainly before Bush quits the White House on January 20."
Oliver Stone's new movie about the American president, W, goes beyond a warts-and-all portrayal of George Bush | World news | guardian.co.uk
Yeah, another liberal wet dream in the making.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 11, 2008, 03:59 PM   #4  
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
tomder55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,682
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
yeah I read that in Stone's movie President Bush plots with Cheney and the neocon cabal while sucking down a non-alcoholic beer. But there is a difference ;Stone claims Bush is a Freudian basketcase. In Falk's warped interpretation Bush did not call the shots at all. He was the victim of a coup by the Jewish Zionist lobby (of which the neocons are the master schemers.but when exactly did OBL become a neocon ?)

What would you expect from someone who once wrote in the NY Slimes about the Ayatollah A**holla :
"The depiction of him as fanatical, reactionary and the bearer of crude prejudices seems certainly and happily false."

Falk is a two~fer . He is a Jew who hates Israel and an American who hates America. Given those credential it is no suprise then that the UN placed him at the head of a UN monitoring agency that oversees Israel .

It only stands to reason that the UN which is generously housed in NYC ,and which owes it's very existance on the generosity of the US tax payer would promote this jerk.

Israel has already refused to accept this clowns visa . Would that they would do the same to Jimmy Carter .

Normally I dismiss such tin foil hat thinking . However when a person of Falk's "stature" regurgitates such pablum then it is likely that innocent people will get killed.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 11, 2008, 04:09 PM   #5  
Senior Member
BABRAM is offline
 
BABRAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 564
BABRAM See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.BABRAM See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
If my memory serves me correct, Falk, is the American Jewish professor that once compared Israel to Nazism. His skewed operandi is overtly suspicious. Personally I have no problem with the UN monitoring Israel, past, present, or future. I do not consider Israel any more perfected than some other major governments. But understand that not all Jews are Zionist and even Zionism recognizes that only when Moshiach comes does a complete Torah government becomes active. As is, we are humans, making good and bad decisions. IMO I think Israel makes more good decisions than bad. In addition, I have no problem with investigations into 9/11 being conducted or placing our politicians under the microscope. But "Falk" would have to prove all his finding and who's going to pay for this (?) or better yet who'd would submit themselves to this grassy knoll witch hunt?! Besides any of Falk's findings will be scrutinized more than Baseball and steroids. In other words, the fact is that this is not the court of public "conspiracy" opinion and any law professor should know better than that.

I'll catch everyone later. Good evening to all.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 11, 2008, 05:48 PM   #6  
Über Member
N0help4u is offline
 
N0help4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: dark side of moon, Pa
Posts: 16,908
N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Send a message via Yahoo to N0help4u
I heard that as I was heading out the door to work this morning.
The way I see it is you want the out come to be a certain way you pick what will get those results to come out that way. Usually when the lefties want to do a study it is for an ulterior motive or to distract from some other issue they want over looked by the media.
Wonder what they are up to this time!
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Apr 12, 2008, 12:04 AM   #7  
Senior Member
inthebox is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 782
inthebox See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.inthebox See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
The U.N. Sex Scandal

Allegations of sexual abuse or misconduct by U.N. staff stretch back at least a decade, to operations in Kosovo, Sierra Leone, Liberia, and Guinea.


UN Oil for Food 'Scandal'

Maybe they have the other way around.....Israel should monitor the UN
  Reply With Quote
 
     

Your Answer
Email me when someone replies to my answer
Join Login





Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Search this Thread

Advanced Search

Bookmarks

Sponsors



Copyright ©2003 - 2009, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:02 PM.