Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
Answer   ||    Advanced Search

Ask your question or search...
International Sites: Nederlandse experts vragen
User Name 
Password 
Join   Forgot password? 

Home > Forum Community > Member Discussions > Current Events   »   Unemployment Numbers

Question
 
 
Old Nov 6, 2009, 07:36 AM
ETWolverine's Avatar
ETWolverine
Senior Member
ETWolverine is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 934
ETWolverine See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ETWolverine See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ETWolverine See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Unemployment Numbers

Well, the October unemplyment numbers came out this morning.

Experts had been expecting a 0.1% increase from 9.8% to 9.9% for the month of October. The Obama Administration was going to argue that there was a slowdown in the rate at which people were losing jobs, and this was proof that the stimulus was working.

Well, reality has just come out and bit them on the butt.

Unemployment increased by 0.4%, or 4 times what they were expecting, to 10.2%.

Additionally, the number of average hours worked by employees in the USA has decreased as well, from 33.3 hours per week in February to 33.1 hours per week in August, to 33.0 in October. That means that those who still have jobs are working (and therefore earning) less than before. Just 1 year ago, that average had been 33.5 hours per week. (Please note that these numbers are seasonally adjusted.)

Of course Obama is going to claim that his stimulus "created or saved" hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions of jobs. Well which is it, created or saved? Because these numbers certainly don't show any job creation. And I don't see very many jobs being saved either.

Is there anyone who is still arguing that the stimulus bill has been effective in any way, shape or form? Is there anyone who believes that the economy is on the upswing due to anything that Obama or the Dems have done?

C'mon folks... are you awake yet?

Elliot

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Nov 6, 2009, 01:26 PM   #11  
Full Member
phlanx is offline
 
phlanx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: England
Posts: 211
phlanx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Where did I say anything of the sort

Have you ever heard of export?

Have you ever heard of international companies?

Recessions have to take a path as we both know, how that path is does depend on individual countries tackling what they see as the important issue

However, the market is so interwoven around the world that where you have major markets also in recession, it will take the combined effort from all to pull the markets out of it

As every countries markets are set up slightly different from each, the policies as you say effect the countries individual market

The EU exports some where around £250bn ($350bn approx) every year

So if your markets are in recession, they will drop our exports down, and the depending on how bad your deflation is working will depend on the value of teh dollar which wil depend on teh value of gold

And way too much to go into, the web of finance is so that each market in the worls is connected - or do you want to deny that individual polices create a market we can all trade in?
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Nov 6, 2009, 02:09 PM   #12  
Full Member
paraclete is offline
 
paraclete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 213
paraclete See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ETWolverine View Post

C'mon folks... are you awake yet?

Elliot
Seems not Elliot. Stimulus in these times isn't wrong but it has to be directed and it would seem that in the case of the US it might have been misdirected.

Billions were spent bailing out the banks but that didn't help much with unemployment just some big salaries. Billions were spent bailing out the auto industry and where has it got you, not very far. Billions have been spent bailing out the insurance industry and your mortgage protection organisations and they still have their hand out. Is insanity endemic to the USA?

It is ironic to view what is happening from where I live. Here we are talking of cutting back stimulus because it is overheating the economy and is inflationary but it is also interesting that we didn't have to put any money into banks and the auto industry only got money to produce green vehicles.
Why the difference, because we believe that a certain part of the market has to be restrained for the good of the nation.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Nov 6, 2009, 06:26 PM   #13  
Senior Member
inthebox is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 782
inthebox See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.inthebox See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Despite the gloomy unemployment figures, the Dow is hovering near 10000 from a low around 6500. What gives?


G&P
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Nov 6, 2009, 06:38 PM   #14  
Full Member
paraclete is offline
 
paraclete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 213
paraclete See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by inthebox View Post
Despite the gloomy unemployment figures, the Dow is hovering near 10000 from a low around 6500. What gives?


G&P
Be pleased it is. The DOW has a lot of ground to make up for value to be restored in the market. Unemployment is only one indicator for the market to send price signals to investors. Right now the signal it sent is positive particularly as it is not as high as expected. Unemployment is what is called a trailing indicator. You can have growth in jobs and still have poor unemployment figures. Other indicators will signal improvement long before employment so you need to watch the other indicators, Currency Prices, Gold Prices, Oil Prices, Interest Rates, Reported Profits; These are some of the major indicators which send price signals to investors. Gold is high now saying that investors are jittery
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Nov 6, 2009, 06:40 PM   #15  
Expert
excon is offline
 
excon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: On the outside
Posts: 13,292
excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by inthebox View Post
Despite the gloomy unemployment figures, the Dow is hovering near 10000 from a low around 6500. What gives?
Hello again, in:

I dunno what's so surprising. The rich are getting richer.

excon
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Nov 6, 2009, 06:48 PM   #16  
Senior Member
inthebox is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 782
inthebox See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.inthebox See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Jan through Mar the Dow, admittedly a small an arbitrary measure, dropped to abut 6500 and plenty were blaming this administration's economic policies, yet since then the market has risen. Has Obama's economic policy changed? or contributed to this gain? or what are investors seeing in the future?

G&P
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Nov 6, 2009, 06:59 PM   #17  
Expert
excon is offline
 
excon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: On the outside
Posts: 13,292
excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by inthebox View Post
Has Obama's economic policy changed? or contributed to this gain? or what are investors seeing in the future?
Hello again, in:

That's just it. Obama's policies haven't changed. He has no intention of going after Wall Street and never did. So they resumed the party.

excon
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Nov 6, 2009, 10:33 PM   #18  
Full Member
paraclete is offline
 
paraclete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 213
paraclete See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by inthebox View Post
Jan through Mar the Dow, admittedly a small an arbitrary measure, dropped to abut 6500 and plenty were blaming this administration's economic policies, yet since then the market has risen. Has Obama's economic policy changed? or contributed to this gain? or what are investors seeing in the future?

G&P
What you are seeing is the return of confidence. When there was little confidence investors took their losses and fled to other investments, Gold, cash Once they decided that the value of stocks wouldn't stay on the bottom for years as in the 30's they took the opportunities low prices offered, confidence returned and values rose. A great deal of value has been lost particularly in some major stocks so the market will take a long time to get back to the high index numbers we saw before but a 50% rise isn't bad, it's a good performance.

Obviously the stimulus has contributed to the return of confidence there is a lot of money and a lot of profit to be had for those companies able to take advantage of the opportunities. Much of the risk has now been assumed by the government and the market is really about valuing risk. Lower risk = higher market
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Nov 7, 2009, 02:55 AM   #19  
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
tomder55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,684
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Clete is correct .The Wall Street bubble is because the Treasury is printing money like crazy and there is no other place to invest it except the market and in inflated gold values. . If you have any money in the market ,ride the wave ,but be prepared to bail out. This will not last it more resembles a dead cat bounce.

As for the unemployment figures .......here is the President justifying the stimulus bucket list .

Quote:
And if nothing is done, this recession might linger for years. Our economy will lose 5 million more jobs. Unemployment will approach double digits.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...020403174.html
Quote:
QUESTION: -- how can the American people gauge whether or not your programs are working?
Can they -- should they be looking at the metric of the stock market, home foreclosures, unemployment? What metric should they use? When? And how will they know if it's working or whether or not we need to go to a Plan B?

MR. OBAMA: I think my initial measure of success is creating or saving 4 million jobs. That's bottom line number one, because if people are working, then they've got enough confidence to make purchases, to make investments. Businesses start seeing that consumers are out there with a little more confidence. And they start making investments, which means they start hiring workers.
So step number one, job creation.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/09/us...ext-obama.html
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Nov 7, 2009, 09:06 AM   #20  
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
tomder55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,684
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
The NY Slimes also recongnizes that the real unemployment rate is 17.5%
The New York Times > Log In

As Elliot has pointed out ;the tried and true way to stimulate the economy is tax cuts . It worked for Reagan as it worked for JFK before him.
  Reply With Quote
 
     

Your Answer
Email me when someone replies to my answer
Join Login



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Ask your question or search...



Similar Threads
unemployment
(2 replies)
unemployment in CT.
(0 replies)
Unemployment in NJ
(2 replies)
tn. unemployment w-2
(2 replies)
letters are numbers and num lock off no numbers
(2 replies)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Search this Thread

Advanced Search

Bookmarks





Copyright ©2003 - 2009, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:51 PM.