Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
  Advanced
Register  |  Log in  
   Ask    
 Answer  
  Help  

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Forum Community > Member Discussions > Current Events   »   Scalia says get over it

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Question
 
 
Old Apr 24, 2008, 03:02 PM
speechlesstx's Avatar
speechlesstx
Ultra Member
speechlesstx is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 1,045
speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Scalia says get over it

For all of you out there that still complain Bush stole the 2000 election, Scalia says "get over it."

Quote:
"Get over it. It’s so old by now. The principal issue in the case, whether the scheme that the Florida Supreme Court had put together violated the federal Constitution, that wasn’t even close. The vote was seven to two," he says, referring to the Supreme Court’s decision that the Supreme Court of Florida’s method for recounting ballots was unconstitutional.

Furthermore, says the outspoken conservative justice, it was Al Gore who ultimately put the issue into the courts. "It was Al Gore who made it a judicial question…. We didn’t go looking for trouble. It was he who said, 'I want this to be decided by the courts,'" says Scalia. "What are we supposed to say -- 'Not important enough?'" he jokes.
LOL, couldn't have put it better myself.

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Apr 28, 2008, 07:16 AM   #21  
Ultra Member
speechlesstx is offline
 
speechlesstx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 1,045
speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BABRAM
I already don't miss Bush.

I like our draft thus far. I think they may be moving Anthony Henry to safety soon, at least I hope he gets a shot at it in camp. If Pacman's reinstated than he mans one corner opposite of Newman with the kid Jenkins playing in schemes when an extra corner is needed in the dime package. This means that Roy Williams most likely is in his last season and if Newman doesn't resign a contract next year we have Jenkins ready to take over.
I think we've got our pass coverage in much better shape and I'm excited to see another Jones and Barber in the backfield. The new Joneses could definitely improve the return game. I wasn't surprised to see Fasano go to Miami but I was a little surprised they traded him at all, looks like Curtis will get a shot at TE 2 - all he does is catch touchdown passes when he gets in the lineup. Yeah, Pacman is a risk but Jerry covered himself and don't forget we have Calvin Hill who seems to do a pretty good job at keeping guys like him in line.
  Reply With Quote
 
     


Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors




Copyright ©2003 - 2007, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:53 AM.