Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
Ask    ||    Answer
 
Advanced  
 

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Forum Community > Member Discussions > Current Events   »   Puppy Mill Bill Moves to the Senate

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Question
 
 
#1  
Old Feb 27, 2008, 04:03 PM
FallenFromGrace's Avatar
FallenFromGrace
Junior Member
FallenFromGrace is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In a box with a laptop.
Posts: 101
FallenFromGrace See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Puppy Mill Bill Moves to the Senate

This is a copy of some info the SPCA posted on their website regarding the House Bill 538. Read it over... let me know if you think this is good or not. I'd like to hear from breeders too. Thanks, Y'all.

House Bill 538 Moves On To Senate!
As the General Assembly is moving to its conclusion we are still fighting on behalf of the puppy mill bill, House Bill 538. After a wonderful effort in the House of Delegates, the bill now resides in the Senate for approval.

That means the bill will be voted on next Monday, February 25, and if it passes the Senate Agriculture Committee vote it will immediately go to Senate Finance, hopefully for approval on the financial impact. The bill will then to a conference committee to receive approval on the amendments. What an exercise!!

The bill was amended yesterday to allow a locality, if it chooses, to expand the total number of animals that a commercial breeding operation may have so long as the locality adopts an ordinance that requires a public hearing and it grants the locality the right to add requirements on the operation as a consequence of the expansion. While we may not be thrilled about this or other amendments, we have to keep pushing to get these large breeding activities to operate in the sunlight so we can try to prevent a crisis.

A spokesperson for the Virginia Federation of Dog Breeders testified yesterday that she saw no reason why they needed a veterinarian to euthanize their animals. She said pounds don't have a vet. Our question and the one we hope you pose to the committee, is "How are they euthanizing without a vet, since they can't get controlled drugs?!?"

The other issue that arose is why not leave it to the USDA? Please remember that you do not need a USDA license unless you sell to pet stores, so if you sell in the newspaper or over the internet you are unaffected. Furthermore, USDA minimum standards are not as strong as Virginia's. The USDA almost never seizes an animal, when they do they need the resources of local government to house them. Finally, there are very few inspections and inspectors and very few registered breeders, so it does not get to the problem.

If you haven't contacted your Senator, then now is absolutely the time. If you have, we need you to do it again. We need you to encourage your colleagues, your friends, and your family, everyone you know throughout Virginia, not just locally.

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Feb 27, 2008, 05:15 PM   #2  
Ultra Member
Allheart is offline
 
Allheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,680
Allheart See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Allheart See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Allheart See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Allheart See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Allheart See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Fallen,

I love you for posting this. For those of you unsure as to what a puppy mill is and the tradgedy that it causes and where the puppies end up, take a look at this.

I warn you though, it is very hard to watch. This report is about Puppy Mills:

  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Feb 27, 2008, 05:29 PM   #3  
Junior Member
FallenFromGrace is offline
 
FallenFromGrace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In a box with a laptop.
Posts: 101
FallenFromGrace See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Thanks Allheart, that report is accurate. I've actually been a part of a confiscation of a puppy mill in Lee Co. NC. It was very much the same. Not all breeders run puppy mills. If anyone on this board breeds responsilbly, I'd like to know their take on the bill.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Feb 27, 2008, 05:31 PM   #4  
Ultra Member
Allheart is offline
 
Allheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,680
Allheart See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Allheart See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Allheart See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Allheart See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Allheart See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FallenFromGrace
Thanks Allheart, that report is accurate. I've actually been a part of a confiscation of a puppy mill in Lee Co. NC. It was very much the same. Not all breeders run puppy mills. If anyone on this board breeds responsilbly, I'd like to know their take on the bill.

Oh no, not at all. There are wonderfull breeders out there. I'm so sorry....

I thought the bill was against Puppy Mills. Oh fallen, I am sorry, I misunderstood.

Forgive your friend please
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Feb 27, 2008, 05:38 PM   #5  
Junior Member
FallenFromGrace is offline
 
FallenFromGrace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In a box with a laptop.
Posts: 101
FallenFromGrace See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allheart
Oh no, not at all. There are wonderfull breeders out there. I'm so sorry....

I thought the bill was against Puppy Mills. Oh fallen, I am sorry, I misunderstood.

Forgive your friend please

It is against puppy mills. That's what we want to stop, not the good breeders. Although, they will have a harder time and they will have to prove themselves. I just want to know how they feel about that.

You were right on, Allheart!
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Feb 27, 2008, 05:40 PM   #6  
Ultra Member
Allheart is offline
 
Allheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,680
Allheart See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Allheart See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Allheart See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Allheart See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Allheart See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Oh Good Fallen. I want to hear as well. I would think they would welcome it, if it means getting rid of the Mills.

Great thread here Fallen!!!!!
  Reply With Quote
 
     

Your Answer
Email me when someone replies to my answer
Join Login





Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Similar Threads
This is ear-mark reform ? [and other Senate moves this week]
(1 replies)
Food Mill
(1 replies)
"puppy mill" dog peeing in house
(6 replies)
purchasing the right tread mill
(1 replies)

Search this Thread

Advanced Search

Bookmarks

Sponsors



Copyright ©2003 - 2009, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:59 PM.