Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
  Advanced
Register  |  Log in  
   Ask    
 Answer  
  Help  

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Forum Community > Member Discussions > Current Events   »   Pandering to economists

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Question
 
 
#1  
Old Jul 12, 2008, 08:11 PM
inthebox
Senior Member
inthebox is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 679
inthebox See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.inthebox See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Pandering to economists

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/13/bu...l?ref=business

Quote:

On many issues, from universal health insurance to increased taxes on the rich, economists do not speak with a single voice. But on some issues we do. Here is an eight-plank platform designed to attract a majority of economists. It is based on discussions I have had with my colleagues — call them focus groups, if you’d like — and polls of my profession:


SUPPORT FREE TRADE

OPPOSE FARM SUBSIDIES

LEAVE OIL COMPANIES AND SPECULATORS ALONE

TAX THE USE OF ENERGY

RAISE THE RETIREMENT AGE

INVITE MORE SKILLED IMMIGRANTS

LIBERALIZE DRUG POLICY

RAISE FUNDS FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH

What do you think, especially the economists out there?


Which ones do you agree with? Which ones not? And why?

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Jul 13, 2008, 10:13 AM   #2  
Expert
excon is offline
 
excon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: On the outside
Posts: 9,205
excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Hello in:

I agree with all of 'em. Ceptin you can't change the retirement age for those 30 and older, because that's like changing the rules in the middle of the game. Raise it for the young people.

Oh, and I ain't no economist.

excon
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 13, 2008, 07:06 PM   #3  
Senior Member
inthebox is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 679
inthebox See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.inthebox See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I actually agree with almost all.



Quote:

USATODAY.com - Social Security gets stretched, strained by long retirements


Social Security's original retirement age of 65 was set in 1935 when life expectancy was 63. Today, life expectancy is 77 — and, for those who live to 65, life expectancy is 83. The system used to benefit financially from people who paid Social Security taxes but died before collecting any benefits

Knowing this, I see nothing wrong with raising the retirement age.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 14, 2008, 06:53 AM   #4  
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
tomder55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,647
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I would pretty much follow plans suggested to transition SS to give choice to the worker . Raising retirement age is bandaids that just kick the can down the road. I agree with Excon that the compact should be honored for most workers already in the plan . They have lived up to their end of the bargain ;the government has not.
That should give pause to anyone who thinks the government can manage enterprises like health care .....(and now mortage banking I guess )
  Reply With Quote
 
     


Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors




Copyright ©2003 - 2007, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:51 AM.