Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
Ask    ||    Answer
 
Advanced  
 

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Forum Community > Member Discussions > Current Events   »   Obama's unchallenged assertion about American Oil

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Question
 
 
#1  
Old Oct 9, 2008, 07:23 AM
tomder55's Avatar
tomder55
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,682
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Obama's unchallenged assertion about American Oil

Quote:
"we have 3% of the world's oil reserves and we use 25% of the world's oil. So what that means is that we can't simply drill our way out of the problem."
He has said it a few times and it has become a standard Democrat talking point . But is it the truth ?

Well his assertion about the usage is generally correct . We do use about 25% of the oil consumed worldwide. That is largely due to the fact that we produce about 28% of the worlds goods and service.

But his numbers about our reserves are completely out of date and McCain should challenge them on the stump and in the next debate .

Current estimates that the US has 20 billion of the 1.3 trillion barrels of the world's crude reserves do not include the 1.2 trillion to 1.8 trillion barrels of shale oil in the Green River Formation ;200 billion barrels of oil below shale in the Bakken Formation ,the 130 billion barrels off our coasts that Congress had placed off limits;and 10 to 20 billion barrels untapped in ANWR .Currently, the United States is the only industrialized country in the world not actively seeking to explore new offshore resources.

Once Canada was locked in as the 21st largest Oil reserves. Then when they began to tap into the 175 billion barrels from the Alberta tar sands they jumped to 2nd. Canada is now our largest oil supplier.

Now I agree that drilling is only a part of the solution to the goal of energy independence . But it is a step we could begin to take immediately . The Democrats should not be allowed to make their claim to a national audience unchallenged.

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Oct 9, 2008, 04:27 PM   #2  
Full Member
Galveston1 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 365
Galveston1 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I'm sorry if I offend someone, but Obama has said so many different, sometimes contridictory things that I have no confidence in anything that he says. It is all to get elected, and then all promises will be forgotten. All a voter can do is observe what he HAS done and remember that the past is prologue. Of course, that can be said of any politician. So CHECK THE RECORD.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Oct 9, 2008, 04:55 PM   #3  
Junior Member
Trandy is offline
 
Trandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 110
Trandy See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I truly believe that Obama has spent his entire carreer with one goal in mind.
He did not "decide" to become president just recently.
All of the choices he has made were steps to where he is today.
McCain on the other hand is tired of politics as they are. He has decided to take a stand, and the strongest position for him to take the stand he knows this country needs is President.
McCain doesn't want to become President of the United States of America to further his carreer, he wants to make an impact on his world. He wants to leave America better for his grand kids grand kids than what has been left for us!!
Obama just wants that feather in his hat. He'll say whatever he needs to (different things for different circumstances)in order to win over VOTES. McCain wants votes too, but only so that he can take the position of the ultimate "Maverick"
It's what our country needs.

oh....and I agree, I hope McCain does a better job of rebutting Mr. Carreer Enhancing Politician Obama's eyerolls than he has been.
Want four more years of beurocracy at it's finest?
( BUREAUCRACY. The abuse of official influence in the affairs of government; corruption. This word has lately been adopted to signify that those persons who are employed in bureaus abuse their authority by intrigue to promote their own benefit, or that of friends, rather than the public good. The word is derived from the French.)

Or someone who will step up to the plate, and open up the doors and curtains of the White House...Congress...and the Senate, so that politicians will make real informed decisions for the benifit of the country? Rather than a nay or aye in representation of the highest bidder!
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Oct 9, 2008, 06:40 PM   #4  
Senior Member
BABRAM is offline
 
BABRAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 564
BABRAM See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.BABRAM See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
The statement is true according to the Energy Information Administration. However, personally I thought, perhaps you did too, that the three percent figure was considering proven oil reserves, not all our oil reserves. Anyway, as for McCain going after Obama, it's just not an easy subject to convey to an audience during a debate. Quite frankly, I don't think McCain truly understands this anyway and therefore his handlers know better than to encourage him on it. Besides it wouldn't help his argument when pushing to get free of oil altogether is the focus of Obama's view.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Oct 10, 2008, 02:19 AM   #5  
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
tomder55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,682
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
your right McCain doesn't understand it or else he would not stubbornly still oppose exploration in ANWR .
  Reply With Quote
 
     

Your Answer
Email me when someone replies to my answer
Join Login





Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Similar Threads
Obama's logo
(10 replies)
Obama's Intelligence?
(22 replies)
Obama's donations .
(23 replies)
Obama's worldwide war on poverty
(70 replies)

Search this Thread

Advanced Search

Bookmarks

Sponsors



Copyright ©2003 - 2009, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:56 PM.