Question
 | |  | | | 
Feb 15, 2008, 12:33 PM
| | Ultra Member | | Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Down on the farm
Posts: 1,802
| | | House Democrats grow a backbone! Oh! Glory!! It's a miracle!! House Defies Bush on Wiretaps | | | | | | |
Answers
 | |  | | |
Feb 15, 2008, 12:49 PM
|
#2
| | Ultra Member
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: La Playa
Posts: 1,406
| Good news |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Feb 16, 2008, 03:26 AM
|
#3
| | Ultra Member
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: New York
Posts: 1,682
| This morning we are significantly less safer than we were yesterday. Good job House Dummycrats! Enjoy your vacation ! OBL is charging up his cell phone as we speak.
At least the Senate Dems acted responsibly . In a Senate controlled by the Democrats, the bill passed by an overwhelming 2-to-1 margin. To attract such numbers, the Bush administration compromised on critically important issues of executive power and expansion of the FISA court’s role.Both sides compromised because they understood that failing to preserve current surveillance authority, would endanger the United States.
Sadly the circus Madam Mimi runs was more interested in if Roger Clemens was getting kickapoo joy juice injections. The term 'useful idiots 'comes immediatley to mind.
I think it is time to ruin their vacation : Quote: |
he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper;
| Article 2 Sec 3 US Constitution
Day by day they have proven to be completely incompetent in running Congress in a responsible manner. |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Feb 16, 2008, 05:32 AM
|
#4
| | Expert
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: On the outside
Posts: 13,231
| Hello tom:
Why would that be? You're not telling me that they stopped, are you? You're not telling me that they CARE about the law, are you??? Nahhh, you know them better than that.
And, what's the worst thing that could happen? They'll need to get a warrant until they get their bill. Oh my gosh. A warrant. Geez, they don't wanna mess around with no warrant.....
So, they're gonna let OBL talk away on his cell phone so Bush can blame the Democrats if he decides to attack. That is the kind of a$$backwards thinking the dufus in chief does.
excon |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Feb 16, 2008, 05:36 AM
|
#5
| | Ultra Member
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: New York
Posts: 1,682
| Quote: |
And, what's the worst thing that could happen? They'll need to get a warrant until they get their bill. Oh my gosh. A warrant. Geez, they don't wanna mess around with no warrant.....
| a warrant to listen to the enemy talk to each other ????? |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Feb 16, 2008, 05:49 AM
|
#6
| | Expert
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: On the outside
Posts: 13,231
| Hello again, tom:
I know you don't like the law. There's a few I don't like either. So what? Here, in this great nation of ours, we can't pick and choose which ones we're gonna obey. Your dufus ain't no exception.
excon |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Feb 16, 2008, 06:10 AM
|
#7
| | Ultra Member
Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: New York
Posts: 1,682
| yeah well now there is no statutory authority to monitor foreign terrorists at all. Smart move Pelosi !!! There is no legal intelligence gathering on OBL ;who has no right to American privacy protection at all ,as of today .
The Senate bill for all it's flaws was better than no bill at all.
The sad thing about it is that every court to rule on the issue ; including the court created by Congress strictly to rule on surveillance matters, the Foreign Intelligence Court of Review, has concluded that the president has inherent constitutional authority to order surveillance on foreign threats to national security.
At this point the President SHOULD tell Congress that until they get their heads out of Clemen's butt that he will exercise his Article II powers to protect the country . Like I said ....call them back into session and demand from them responsible legislation like the Senate produced on this matter . |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Feb 16, 2008, 06:21 AM
|
#8
| | Expert
Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: On the outside
Posts: 13,231
| Hello again, tom:
I never thought the steroid thing was a partisan issue. But, I thought wrong. Apparently, the Republicans think it's just fine and dandy that Clemen's is a cheater........ Which, upon reflection, shouldn't surprise me at all.
Like I said, your dufus in chief isn't listening to congress. You, yourself say that he has Constitutional authority. You're not telling me he hung up, are you???
No, tom. You just want to rant about the Democrats who are about take over all THREE branches of government. I guess they're gonna do that because the dufus in chief did such a wonderful job...... Bwa, ha ha ha ha.
excon |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Feb 16, 2008, 08:51 AM
|
#9
| | Ultra Member
Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: La Playa
Posts: 1,406
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by tomder55 yeah well now there is no statutory authority to monitor foreign terrorists at all. Smart move Pelosi !!! There is no legal intelligence gathering on OBL ;who has no right to American privacy protection at all ,as of today .produced on this matter . | I'm not sure that's accurate Tom. Didn't Clinton long ago extend the "organized crime wiretap rules" to terrorist. |
| | | | | | |  | |  | | |
Feb 16, 2008, 10:14 AM
|
#10
| | Senior Relationship Expert
Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Space Is The Place
Posts: 25,314
| Geez, how hard is it for the PREZ, to get a warrant for gosh sakes. He just makes a call, and they fax it over, like yesterday. Do we need a law for that??? |
| | | | | | | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
Bookmarks
| | |