At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them
answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in
answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you
will be able to:
Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+
topics.
I am not sure if I am missing something here but if the senator rotates clergy every year to do a "religous" holiday ceremony what did he expect the clergy was going to say? I may think too simple but if he didn't want the name Jesus Christ to be mentioned he should have done one of three things 1) mentioned to him before hand as Scott has stated or 2) do not get a clergy to do it or 3) as CurlyBen stated to cancel the whole thing. I know I am going to have flak for this but if government officials think that the gov shouldn't have anything to do with religion then why does the governement have the holiday off in the first place? I work for NYS and am grateful for it but maybe the gov shouldn't declare this as a national holiday and only the ones who celebrate it should be priviledged to have it off as the Jewish holidays do. In the end, I agree the senator shouldn't have made the priest look like an idiot and made that statement. What gets me is he was from the priest's congregation so he had every avenue to mention this before hand knowing a priest MAY bring this up.
I'm afraid you did miss a few things. First, there is no indication that the politician (he is Town supervisor, not a senator, I may have mistated that) had either picked the priest or talked with him beforehand. That was probably done by town staffers. Second, there was no mention that this was a "religious" holiday ceremony, other than calling it a "Christmas" tree lighting. But if Jewish and Islamic clerics had officiated in the past, then it clearly was not intended as a Christian ceremony. So I do believe the priest overstepped his bounds. It should have been made clear that this was to be a non-denominational ceremony, but I feel the priest should have known that. Third, the politician is Jewish, so he is not a member of the priest's congregation.
But you do bring up a rather interesting point. Should Christmas be a national holiday? Its the only national holiday that has anything to do with religion. The more I think of it, the more I think it shouldn't. However, I also think its too ingrained in the American psyche for this to ever be changed. I think that's one of the reason that the holiday has become so secularized. I think we need to realize that there are two Christmases. There is the religious celebration of the birth of Christ as the son of God. But there is another side. There is also the secular celebration of a winter holiday that is about presents and giving and the awe and smiles of children. While there is, clearly, some crossover between the two, they have to be looked at as separate.
Let me relate something here. I have a p/t gig as mfg's rep. I spend a few hours each week in a retail store answering people's questions about the company's products. I've been provided with stickers that show characters from a recent animated film. I hand these out to little kids during the day. I am totally amazed a the reactions I get. The smiles and pleasure these kids get from a piece of glossy paper 3" in diameter is amazing and heart warming. To me that's a very big part of this holiday, a part that transcends the religious significance to those who believe in Christ.
As I have stated before, and will continue to state, laws were made my minorities, ruling that Gov't and Public Places can't display anthing with the word Christ, and in this case "Christ"mas lights.
Do you listen to yourself? Laws were made by minorities? How can that be when a law needs a majority vote to pass?
Quote:
Originally Posted by fredg
It will come a time when all this will be History, and Christians everywhere will be, once again, allowed to practice their faith, without questioning by those who have a soapbox full of laws against us.
There are too many who don't want to "offend" anyone with anything about religion. Even though Christmas is the birth of Christ, there are those who want to forget it, and not allow it to be mentioned, anywhere.
Funny that some very large department store chains "backed down" from their "no display" of the word "Christmas"....
As far as Christmas lights on Public Property, and even on Gov't property, I have seen many of them here in this area. Just the fact that a Senator seems to have missed something shows that traditions are not dead yet!
Merry Christmas to all, and Happy New Year. If I offend you, then it's your problem, and you haven't yet accepted the fact that this is America.
And again, you overreact. No one is denying you the right to practice your faith. No one is coming into your church and saying you can't celebrate the birth of Christ. No one is coming into your home and saying you can't have a tree with religious ornaments or say Merry Christmas to your friends and family. To even make that statement is ridiculous and shows a lack of understanding of the issue.
The ONE and ONLY issue here whether government property, government funds or government sponsorship should be used in support of ANY particular religious group. Nothing more nothing less. My feeling is either all or nothing. Here you allow any religion the right to make their displays or none. And there are religions whose displays will be a lot more offensive to Christians then a nativity scene is to non-Christians.
I'm afraid you did miss a few things. First, there is no indication that the politician (he is Town supervisor, not a senator, I may have mistated that) had either picked the priest or talked with him beforehand. That was probably done by town staffers. Second, there was no mention that this was a "religious" holiday ceremony, other than calling it a "Christmas" tree lighting. But if Jewish and Islamic clerics had officiated in the past, then it clearly was not intended as a Christian ceremony. So I do believe the priest overstepped his bounds. It should have been made clear that this was to be a non-denominational ceremony, but I feel the priest should have known that. Third, the politician is Jewish, so he is not a member of the priest's congregation.
But you do bring up a rather interesting point. Should Christmas be a national holiday? Its the only national holiday that has anything to do with religion. The more I think of it, the more I think it shouldn't. However, I also think its too ingrained in the American psyche for this to ever be changed. I think that's one of the reason that the holiday has become so secularized. I think we need to realize that there are two Christmases. There is the religious celebration of the birth of Christ as the son of God. But there is another side. There is also the secular celebration of a winter holiday that is about presents and giving and the awe and smiles of children. While there is, clearly, some crossover between the two, they have to be looked at as separate.
Let me relate something here. I have a p/t gig as mfg's rep. I spend a few hours each week in a retail store answering people's questions about the company's products. I've been provided with stickers that show characters from a recent animated film. I hand these out to little kids during the day. I am totally amazed a the reactions I get. The smiles and pleasure these kids get from a piece of glossy paper 3" in diameter is amazing and heart warming. To me that's a very big part of this holiday, a part that transcends the religious significance to those who believe in Christ.
Scott<>
Scott, sorry about the mistake. I guess in the middle of my rant I got carried away and thought he picked him also went to his congregation. Before I try to make another point I want to say I commend you for not swaying from your points on this matter that from what I have read on other posts are pretty consistent on your points about not having religous ceremonies and such on government property. With that said, I still say the with having clergy being picked it is really hard to not relate to their belief and faith. Again, why pick clergymen and not everyday people or celebrities to do the job? This world is sensitive about what is said and done nowadays we really need to all live in a bubble so we won't offend anyone. I have to say I am offended constantly by what people say and do, but I am strong enough to let it roll off my back. Again, I work in NYS but just because the government shouldn't be having anything to do with religous symbols or ceremonies doesn't give a right for someone to take the name of God in vain (ie. Jesus Christ). This is a common thing and yet to me that is offensive and gives no regard for Christians. If I had presented that to my boss and made a big deal about it, I would be laughed at and rediculed so bad I wouldn't want to take it any furthur. I guess the moral of what I am trying to say is that we have to stop being so offended by what everyone says and does. Sorry for ranting about something kinda off the subject but I feel it needed to be said. I think if this country wasn't so sensitive the supervisor wouldn't have felt he needed to jump up right away and cover for what was said. Instead, he might have said something afterwards. Anyways, I hope I amde my point and didn't make things worse.
JD,
I don't necessarily disagree with you. But there is a spirtuality about this time of the year that makes it common for clergy to officiate at such ceremonies. The priest did not have to make his blessing specific to any one religion and that was his choice and his mistake. I would say the same thing if a Rabbi had referred specifically to Jewish worship or an Islamic cleric to Allah.
But I do very much agree that we need to develop thicker skins. That we need to look beyond what people say and look at their motives and reasoning. That's why I think the politician over reacted. I think that priest was just doing what came naturally and had no intention to offend.
When someone wishes me a Merry Christmas I assume they are being sincere about being nice so I respond with a Happy Holiday.
Hi,
Does anyone else feel that Christmas Day, December 25, should NOT be a National Holiday??
ScottGem's post said he thinks it should not be, or at least, think about NOT having it as such!
American Traditions and Beliefs are fast being lost to such thinking.
Hi,
Does anyone else feel that Christmas Day, December 25, should NOT be a National Holiday??
ScottGem's post said he thinks it should not be, or at least, think about NOT having it as such!
American Traditions and Beliefs are fast being lost to such thinking.
Can you explain that Fred? American Tradition is freedom of Religion. So is it fair that Dec 25th is a national holiday, but Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur or Ramadan aren't? How does not having Dec 25th as a national holiday interfere with American Traditions and Beliefs? It might interfere with Christian Traditions and Beliefs, but there is no state religion in America. So explain to me why Christmas should have been made a national Holiday in the first place?
Hi,
Does anyone else feel that Christmas Day, December 25, should NOT be a National Holiday??
ScottGem's post said he thinks it should not be, or at least, think about NOT having it as such!
American Traditions and Beliefs are fast being lost to such thinking.
So how come channukah is not a national holiday? How come the chinese new year is not a national holiday?
Hi,
Does anyone else feel that Christmas Day, December 25, should NOT be a National Holiday??
ScottGem's post said he thinks it should not be, or at least, think about NOT having it as such!
American Traditions and Beliefs are fast being lost to such thinking.
American traditions and beliefs are changing to reflect the changing of the face of America.No longer is the judeo-christian the only thinking in america,as many other minorities have changed the landscape of this country,In many areas of the land the minority has become the majority.Change has been in the wind for a long time and those that must change with it are having a hard time moving over and accepting the fact that America is truly a melting pot of many different traditions and beliefs.Which brings us to the question should Christmas be a national holiday?My opinion ,why not? And along those lines,Ramadan,Rosh Hashanah,Yom Kippur,Ramadan and the Chinese New Year should be national holidays also.In a multicultural nation shouldn't all the cultures be treated the same?
Linear Mode
