Drug evidence gathered after an arrest that violated state law.

magprob · Apr 24, 2008, 12:47 PM

Supreme Court Rules To Support Drug Evidence Gathered During Improper Arrests - America Talks Back, News

Supreme Court Rules To Support Drug Evidence Gathered During Improper Arrests

OK. Now I am confused by this one. Could someone explain to me what this really means? Does it mean that state search and siezure laws are superseded by federal law, denying the appeals process? So if one appeals the conviction on the grounds of illegal search and siezure, the feds uphold an illegal arrest by city, county, or state law enforcement?

tomder55 · Apr 27, 2008, 01:13 AM

good point George. it wasn't the defendant that brought the case to the Feds.

George_1950 · Apr 28, 2008, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by excon

Hello again, George:

I think Virginia COULD. Look, it's gonna come down to a fight somewhere down the road where the states are gonna say enough. I'm ready. I'll be the first one to join the Virginia militia in their war of secession and liberation.

You either believe in (and are willing to fight for) conservative values, or you cave, like most libs.

excon

Well, well, well; the people desire to speak on abortion once again. And consider where the Supreme Court would be today with selections by either Gore or Kerry.
South Dakota to hold abortion referendum
And you understand that even if the people of SD approve this constitutional amendment, that the U.S. Supreme Court can rule that it is invalid? Shall we prepare to start the next revolution in South Dakota?



At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to: Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics. Accept money for answers that you provide. Communicate privately with other members (PM). See fewer ads. Sign Up!