Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
  Advanced
Register  |  Log in  
   Ask    
 Answer  
  Help  

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Forum Community > Member Discussions > Current Events   »   In defence of President G.W. Bush

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Question
 
 
#1  
Old Jul 17, 2008, 03:12 PM
Galveston1
Full Member
Galveston1 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 288
Galveston1 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
In defence of President G.W. Bush

The war in Iraq. The single man most responsible for that war was Saddam. He had wmd in the past, acted like he did just before the war, could have avoided the war by simply allowing UN inspectors to do their job, was warned several times, stubbornly followed his own failed policies.

The 9/11 attack: President Bush actually started doing something to bring the terrorists to judgment, unlike Clinton, who when the twin towers were bombed the first time, fired a couple of ineffective cruise missiles, destroying an asprin factory.

The economy: President Bush led the way to serious tax cuts that allowed our economy to rebound in spite of it falling off when he took office and the additional massive economic burden of the 9/11 attack. The present inflation is the result of normal supply and demand which would have occurred no matter who the president is. If Democrats had gotten out of the way, maybe we would have more supply by now.

Security: We haven’t had another attack in our homeland since 9/11. (Maybe by the time you read this we will have had, but so far, so good.) I will agree that President Bush has been soft on border security, but which of his opponents for the presidency would have handled that issue any better?

SCOTUS: President Bush is responsible for the appointment of 2 judges who, so far, appear to be of the opinion that the Constitution means what is says, and we don’t need to look to foreign nations to decide what we will do here. I wonder if we would have affirmation of our right to bear arms if either Gore or Kerry had appointed those two judges?

President Bush has refused to sign on to KYOTO, and this is saving this country from a real nightmare. What would Gore have done?

President Bush is not perfect, who is? He certainly does not deserve the vile hatred that has come his way. That has gone far beyond disagreement with policy and descended into the personal realm and says FAR MORE ABOUT THE CHARACTER OF HIS DETRACTORS than it does about him.

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Jul 17, 2008, 03:53 PM   #2  
Ultra Member
twinkiedooter is offline
 
twinkiedooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Nothinghappenshere, Ohio
Posts: 4,325
twinkiedooter See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.twinkiedooter See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.twinkiedooter See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I disagree totally with all of your "defenses" as you put it.

I guess you totally dismiss W's calling the Constitution "a goddam piece of paper"...... and other things he did all by himself with no one else's help.

You forgot the skyrocketing gasoline prices..... I guess being a former oilman had nothing to do with that either.

I don't know what Gore would have done to this country..... but it sure would not have been of the same magnitude that W has accomplished all by himself (and his clever handlers).

Let me guess.... you want W to run for another 4 years?

I haven't laughed so hard at anything today. I think you should have posted this under the Humor and Comedy section.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 17, 2008, 10:06 PM   #3  
Full Member
WVHiflyer is offline
 
WVHiflyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SW PA
Posts: 390
WVHiflyer See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
twinkie - I agree with you. The only reason I don't want Bush impeached - and jailed, is that it would mean that other would be the Pres. Gotta send Cheney away first and now there's no time.



-
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 18, 2008, 02:32 AM   #4  
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
tomder55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,604
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I have said for some time that President Bush will leave like Truman with extremely unpopular polling and history will vindicate him on most of the issues you raise.
The Bush Doctrine will be the template that future Presidents will use to engage jihadistan much like the Truman Doctrine was the blueprint for the Cold War.
The economy is cyclical and Bush was in office during recovery from 2 economic downturns . The 1st was the tech-stock bubble collapse and the 2nd was the aftermath of 9-11. We went on to have one of the longest sustained expansions in history and I still think the slowdown will end sometime in the fall. I think you have seen peak prices in oil and other commodities like gold and silver .......sell if you have them .

I just wish Bush had more time to appoint another SCOTUS oligarch . All he was able to really do was provide balance. The next President may replace as many as 3 judges .So you know what is at stake in this election.

Twinkie ..... please note that oil prices began to jump when Madame Mimi Pelosi and Harry Reid took over Congress.

The Goracle yesterday announced a 10 year plan to get us off fossile fuels . He gave no details but compared it to the Kennedy Challenge to go to the moon..
uhhhhh................. How did we get there ? With solar power ? I'm telling you ,Neil Armstrong left a huge carbon footprint on the moon!!!
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 18, 2008, 03:41 AM   #5  
Ultra Member
NeedKarma is offline
 
NeedKarma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Depends on which web proxy I'm using
Posts: 6,024
NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
How did we get there ? With solar power ? I'm telling you ,Neil Armstrong left a huge carbon footprint on the moon!!!
You think the Apollo rockets used oil? Saturn V - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 18, 2008, 04:06 AM   #6  
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
tomder55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,604
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
thanks for the clarification I stand corrected .
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 18, 2008, 05:40 AM   #7  
Expert
excon is offline
 
excon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: On the outside
Posts: 8,816
excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Hello:

In my view, Bush will go down in hisory as the WORST president EVER.

excon
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 18, 2008, 06:05 AM   #8  
Ultra Member
George_1950 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,736
George_1950 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.George_1950 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.George_1950 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Send a message via Yahoo to George_1950
Quote:
Originally Posted by twinkiedooter
I disagree totally with all of your "defenses" as you put it.

I guess you totally dismiss W's calling the Constitution "a goddam piece of paper"...... and other things he did all by himself with no one else's help.
You have evidence of this?
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 18, 2008, 06:09 AM   #9  
Ultra Member
George_1950 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,736
George_1950 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.George_1950 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.George_1950 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Send a message via Yahoo to George_1950
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomder55
...

The Goracle yesterday announced a 10 year plan to get us off fossile fuels . He gave no details but compared it to the Kennedy Challenge to go to the moon..
Let's see: Gore is one of those guys that lead by example, right? Don't do as I do, but do as I say.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 18, 2008, 06:15 AM   #10  
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
tomder55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,604
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
worse Presidents :James Buchanan (watched and did nothing as the Union disintegrated ),Andrew Johnson (vetoed civil rights legislations after civil war) among others . Herbert Hoover (turned an economic downturn into the Great Depression .Campaigned for and signed the Smoot-Hawley trade protection act and then passed the Revenue Tax Act of 1932 that raised income taxes, estate taxes and corporate taxes ...plunging the country into the Great Depression), Jimmy Carter (for a number of reasons) . John Tyler was called "acting President" or "his accidency" .He was expelled from his own party while he was President. Franklin Pierce was so bad he is the only President not renominated by his own party. He signed to disasterous Kansas-Nebraska act ;killing the fragile balance achieved by the Missouri Compromise.

My initial ranking puts President Bush smack in the middle of the pack . We do not know yet because alot of his policies are still ongoing .But there is more he could've done in the area of illegal immigration control and entitlement reform .
  Reply With Quote
 
     


Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors

Similar Threads
Question Asker Forum Answers Last Post
What is a defence for Theft Under, when charged for a first time. No criminal record ipollard Criminal Law 0 Feb 25, 2008 06:31 AM
What do Osama bin Laden and President Bush have in common? Dark_crow Current Events 21 Jan 31, 2008 07:24 PM
Collection Summons. Is my defence valid? helpsteve Small Claims 6 Dec 23, 2007 07:54 AM
President krisb Government 11 Sep 29, 2006 04:21 AM
Bush: The WORST President in History? Debra Other Member Discussions 41 May 25, 2006 06:47 PM




Copyright ©2003 - 2007, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:18 AM.