Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
  Advanced
Register  |  Log in  
   Ask    
 Answer  
  Help  

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Forum Community > Member Discussions > Current Events   »   Dear NeoCons, Cease and Desist.

 
Question Tools Search this Question Display Modes
Question
 
 
#1  
Old Jun 16, 2008, 08:56 PM
magprob's Avatar
magprob
Ultra Member
magprob is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,649
magprob See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.magprob See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.magprob See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Dear NeoCons, Cease and Desist.

We are working hard here in Idaho to reclaim our sovereignty also. Do the Neocons on AMHD think this is a bad idea? I am sure you do so, I would like to hear why.
By the way Oklahoma, I am proud of you and my hat is off as I bow down before you.

Oklahoma State House of Representatives - House Votes

STATE OF OKLAHOMA
2nd Session of the 51st Legislature (2008)
HOUSE JOINT
RESOLUTION 1089 By: Key
AS INTRODUCED
A Joint Resolution claiming sovereignty under the
Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United
States over certain powers; serving notice to the
federal government to cease and desist certain
mandates; and directing distribution.
WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United
States reads as follows:
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to
the States respectively, or to the people."; and
WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal
power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the
United States and no more; and
WHEREAS, the scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means
that the federal government was created by the states specifically
to be an agent of the states; and

WHEREAS, today, in 2008, the states are demonstrably treated as
agents of the federal government; and
WHEREAS, many federal mandates are directly in violation of the
Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and
WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York
v. United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not
simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the
states; and
WHEREAS, a number of proposals from previous administrations and
some now pending from the present administration and from Congress
may further violate the Constitution of the United States.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
AND THE SENATE OF THE 2ND SESSION OF THE 51ST OKLAHOMA LEGISLATURE:
THAT the State of Oklahoma hereby claims sovereignty under the
Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all
powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal
government by the Constitution of the United States.
THAT this serve as Notice and Demand to the federal government,
as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates
that are beyond the scope of these constitutionally delegated
powers.
THAT a copy of this resolution be distributed to the President
of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the
Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the Speaker

of the House and the President of the Senate of each state's
legislature of the United States of America, and each member of the
Oklahoma Congressional Delegation.

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Jun 16, 2008, 09:34 PM   #2  
N0help4u
Ultra Member
N0help4u is offline
 
N0help4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: dark side of moon, Pa
Posts: 9,690
N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Send a message via Yahoo to N0help4u
Last month I heard another state is considering doing the same thing. They said they would no longer be a part of the USA if they take away gun rights. I think it was Wyoming.
I have been wanting to move to Az but seems like I am stuck where I am and waiting to see which states will not follow all these laws taking away our rights. I will be ready as soon as I know for sure which ones are for real on that!
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 17, 2008, 04:08 AM   #3  
tomder55
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
tomder55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,546
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I am in sympathy and support states asserting their 10th amendment perogatives . What has this to do with neocons?
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 17, 2008, 08:25 AM   #4  
magprob
Ultra Member
magprob is offline
 
magprob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,649
magprob See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.magprob See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.magprob See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
If you don't know, (which you don't,) then little ole me can't tell you. I don't watch FAUX news tom. I get my news from many sources, sift thru it and still wind up confused. Now that's a shame.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 17, 2008, 08:38 AM   #5  
tomder55
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
tomder55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,546
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
well neocons are normally connected to foreign affairs so I don't see where 10th amendment considerations come into play . [for the record ;I spend much more time watching MSNBC when I watch televison at all if that has any bearing on this ] Why don't you with your ecelectic sourcing answer my question ?I would respond to your request for clarification.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 17, 2008, 09:35 AM   #6  
speechlesstx
Ultra Member
speechlesstx is offline
 
speechlesstx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 1,044
speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Works for me, too and I also fail to see how this is strictly a neocon issue. Seems Oklahoma's beef is with the feds, period, "a number of proposals from previous administrations and some now pending from the present administration and from Congress." Previous administrations and congress implies a lot of contempt for Democrat policies as well.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 17, 2008, 10:04 AM   #7  
excon
Expert
excon is online now
 
excon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: On the outside
Posts: 8,516
excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Hello States Righters:

Does the State of Washington have the right to legalize marijuana? Does the state of California have the right to legalize gay marriage?

States rights are NOT all about abortion.

excon
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 17, 2008, 10:23 AM   #8  
N0help4u
Ultra Member
N0help4u is offline
 
N0help4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: dark side of moon, Pa
Posts: 9,690
N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Send a message via Yahoo to N0help4u
I have been saying they should make California, Washington and some other liberal counties and states everything the liberals want with all the rights they want and the more conservative states with the rights they want. Then they can see what states prosper and what ones fall apart.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 17, 2008, 10:28 AM   #9  
tomder55
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
tomder55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,546
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Washington has a medical marijuana law doesn't it ? I told you the problem with the California law. The fact is that people from all over the country are going there to get their Calif."marriage "license and then will return to their own state to challenge their States laws in court.

Do the people of California have a right to decide it ? They said no and the court said yes.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 17, 2008, 10:31 AM   #10  
speechlesstx
Ultra Member
speechlesstx is offline
 
speechlesstx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 1,044
speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by excon
Hello States Righters:

Does the State of Washington have the right to legalize marijuana? Does the state of California have the right to legalize gay marriage?

States rights are NOT all about abortion.

excon


ex, this was one was about the whole shootin' match, not just abortion, and seems to have been prompted over immigration laws.
  Reply With Quote
 
     


Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors

Similar Questions
Question Asker Topic Answers Last Post
Dear All, nandhi1965 Introductions 5 May 14, 2008 09:20 AM
Should I write a cease and desist letter lindiethrock Bankruptcy & Debt 3 Feb 28, 2008 05:24 AM
dear sir marzcom Spyware, Viruses, etc. 1 Dec 12, 2007 01:10 AM
What does sending a cease and desist actually do? infoseeker Other Law 1 Oct 4, 2006 07:25 AM
cease and disist kenrhon Other Law 5 Sep 7, 2006 04:36 PM




Copyright ©2003 - 2007, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:57 PM.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.