Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
  Advanced
Register  |  Log in  
   Ask    
 Answer  
  Help  

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Forum Community > Member Discussions > Current Events   »   Dear NeoCons, Cease and Desist.

 
Question Tools Search this Question Display Modes
Question
 
 
Old Jun 16, 2008, 08:56 PM
magprob's Avatar
magprob
Ultra Member
magprob is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,649
magprob See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.magprob See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.magprob See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Dear NeoCons, Cease and Desist.

We are working hard here in Idaho to reclaim our sovereignty also. Do the Neocons on AMHD think this is a bad idea? I am sure you do so, I would like to hear why.
By the way Oklahoma, I am proud of you and my hat is off as I bow down before you.

Oklahoma State House of Representatives - House Votes

STATE OF OKLAHOMA
2nd Session of the 51st Legislature (2008)
HOUSE JOINT
RESOLUTION 1089 By: Key
AS INTRODUCED
A Joint Resolution claiming sovereignty under the
Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United
States over certain powers; serving notice to the
federal government to cease and desist certain
mandates; and directing distribution.
WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United
States reads as follows:
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to
the States respectively, or to the people."; and
WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal
power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the
United States and no more; and
WHEREAS, the scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means
that the federal government was created by the states specifically
to be an agent of the states; and

WHEREAS, today, in 2008, the states are demonstrably treated as
agents of the federal government; and
WHEREAS, many federal mandates are directly in violation of the
Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and
WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York
v. United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not
simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the
states; and
WHEREAS, a number of proposals from previous administrations and
some now pending from the present administration and from Congress
may further violate the Constitution of the United States.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
AND THE SENATE OF THE 2ND SESSION OF THE 51ST OKLAHOMA LEGISLATURE:
THAT the State of Oklahoma hereby claims sovereignty under the
Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all
powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal
government by the Constitution of the United States.
THAT this serve as Notice and Demand to the federal government,
as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates
that are beyond the scope of these constitutionally delegated
powers.
THAT a copy of this resolution be distributed to the President
of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the
Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the Speaker

of the House and the President of the Senate of each state's
legislature of the United States of America, and each member of the
Oklahoma Congressional Delegation.

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Jun 17, 2008, 05:26 PM   #21  
BABRAM
Senior Member
BABRAM is offline
 
BABRAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 531
BABRAM See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.BABRAM See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Choux
Time to see the *Big Picture* you guys.

Our country is the titanic after it hit the iceberg(Presidential failure to address the imported oil situation after Carter), the lights are still on and the music is playing, but ......we are going down fast without change.

.....the Fascists(formerly Conservatives)don't want to make changes so that we can save America before it hits bottom.

Good point. It was actually George Herbert Walker Bush that put parts of the US coast line drilling ban in effect, and then the moratorium was further extended by Bill Clinton.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 17, 2008, 05:36 PM   #22  
N0help4u
Ultra Member
N0help4u is offline
 
N0help4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: dark side of moon, Pa
Posts: 9,574
N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.N0help4u See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Send a message via Yahoo to N0help4u
They just said on the news that Bush W is suppose to sign a bill that allows off shore drilling tomorrow. Hope I heard right.
I blame the environmentalists for us not being allowed to use our own oil.
They say that Colorado and Anwar has more oil than Saudi Arabia
so why do we bow to the environmentalists?
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 17, 2008, 05:38 PM   #23  
Fr_Chuck
Christianity Expert
Fr_Chuck is offline
 
Fr_Chuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 24,893
Fr_Chuck has disabled reputation
States lost that right long ago, anyone remember the civil war, that was a states right issue, they lost, federal government gained control and has only increased it ever sense.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 17, 2008, 08:11 PM   #24  
BABRAM
Senior Member
BABRAM is offline
 
BABRAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 531
BABRAM See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.BABRAM See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by N0help4u
They just said on the news that Bush W is suppose to sign a bill that allows off shore drilling tomorrow. Hope I heard right.
I blame the environmentalists for us not being allowed to use our own oil.
They say that Colorado and Anwar has more oil than Saudi Arabia
so why do we bow to the environmentalists?

If Dubya signs and lifts the moratorium his father initiated it would realistically give us a four year window of oil supply off the coasts alone. Car manufacturer's should be racing to take the opportunity for the coming supply and demand for alternative powered vehicles. Of course with inflation and stagnant wages, the cost of these new vehicles may be not be reasonably affordable or in the budget for the middle/lower classes.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jun 18, 2008, 01:15 AM   #25  
tomder55
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
tomder55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,541
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
yeah Fr Chuck the South fought for the States rights to enslave people. It is arguments like yours that discredits the whole concept of States rights.
  Reply With Quote
 
     


Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors

Similar Questions
Question Asker Topic Answers Last Post
Dear All, nandhi1965 Introductions 5 May 14, 2008 09:20 AM
Should I write a cease and desist letter lindiethrock Bankruptcy & Debt 3 Feb 28, 2008 05:24 AM
dear sir marzcom Spyware, Viruses, etc. 1 Dec 12, 2007 01:10 AM
What does sending a cease and desist actually do? infoseeker Other Law 1 Oct 4, 2006 07:25 AM
cease and disist kenrhon Other Law 5 Sep 7, 2006 04:36 PM




Copyright ©2003 - 2007, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:55 PM.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.