Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
Answer   ||    Advanced Search    ||    Help
Ask your question or search...
Login with Facebook
User Name 
Password 
Forgot password? 

Want to become a member? It's free and once you join you can ask and answer questions. Join Now!

Home > Forum Community > Member Discussions > Current Events   »   Calling Al Gore: Where are you?

Question
 
 
Old Jan 13, 2009, 09:00 AM
George_1950's Avatar
George_1950
Ultra Member
George_1950 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,107
George_1950 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.George_1950 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.George_1950 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Send a message via Yahoo to George_1950
Calling Al Gore: Where are you?

"BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) - Residents of the upper Midwest bundled up or just stayed inside Tuesday as a wave of bitterly cold air barreled south out of the Arctic, following on the heels of a fast-moving blizzard.
Some schools closed because of the cold and temperatures hit the single digits as far south as Kansas and Missouri.

The coldest air spilled across the Canadian prairie into the Dakotas and Minnesota. Grand Forks, N.D., dropped to a record low of 37 degrees below zero Tuesday morning, lopping six degrees off the old record set in 1979, the National Weather Service said.

In northern Minnesota, it was 35 below zero in Roseau and 36 below in Hallock, with wind chills down to 45 below in Hibbing. Just to the north, Winnipeg, Saskatchewan, also hit minus 36, according to Environment Canada.

In North Dakota, the Minot area got 6 inches of snow, on top of about a foot that fell late last week, and Bismarck collected 4. Bismarck, Fargo and Grand Forks all broke snow records for December, each with more than 30 inches."
Sharp cold wave shocks upper Midwest, temps to -36

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Jan 14, 2009, 10:45 AM   #41  
Ultra Member
George_1950 is offline
 
George_1950's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,107
George_1950 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.George_1950 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.George_1950 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Send a message via Yahoo to George_1950
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr D View Post
...
Go AZ Cardinals - "The worst team to ever be in the playoffs." This Cinderella team, led by Kurt Warner, the patron saint of old, over the hill guys, could take it all. - A Zonie
Actually led by Ken Whisenhunt, who should be coach of the year, with respect to the Falcons.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jan 14, 2009, 11:12 AM   #42  
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
tomder55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,691
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I suspect that if AZ makes it to the Bowl ,by the time Warner finishes 60 minutes against either of the AFC defenses;they will be playing Taps in his honor .
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jan 14, 2009, 11:41 AM   #43  
Ultra Member
speechlesstx is offline
 
speechlesstx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 1,098
speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Since my team obviously has an aversion to playing past November I'm pulling for the team from their home away from home (which might change if they keep winning). Go Cards!

Q. What do you call 47 millionaires sitting around with their feet up, snacking and drinking beer while watching the Super Bowl on TV?

A. The Dallas Cowboys

Q. What do the Dallas Cowboys and Billy Graham have in common?

A. They both can make 70,000 people stand up and yell, "Jesus Christ."

Q. How do you keep a Dallas Cowboy out of your yard?

A. Put up a goal post.

Q. What do you call a Dallas Cowboy with a Super Bowl ring?

A. A thief.

Q. What's the difference between the Dallas Cowboys and a dollar bill?

A. You can still get four quarters out of a dollar bill.

Q. How many Dallas Cowboys does it take to win a Super Bowl?

A. Nobody remembers and we will very likely never find out!

Q. What do the Cowboys and a possums have in common?

A. Both play dead at home and get killed on the road!
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jan 14, 2009, 12:10 PM   #44  
Ultra Member
speechlesstx is offline
 
speechlesstx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 1,098
speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speechlesstx See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Here we go, Worldwatch says we must not only halt ALL carbon emissions by 2050, we must "go negative" after that.

Quote:
To avoid the most catastrophic effects of climate change, world carbon emissions will have to drop to near zero by 2050 and "go negative" after that, the Worldwatch Institute reported on Tuesday.

This is a deeper cut than called for by most climate experts and policymakers, including President-elect Barack Obama, who favors an 80 percent drop in U.S. carbon emissions by mid-century.

Limiting carbon emissions aims to keep global mean temperature from rising more than 3.6 degrees F (2 degrees C) over what it was before the Industrial Revolution -- but one Worldwatch author said even this is too dangerous.

"Global warming needs to be reduced from peak levels to 1 degree (Celsius, or 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit) as fast as possible," co-author William Hare said at a briefing on the "State of the World 2009" report. "At this level you can see some of the risks fade into the background."

Global mean temperature has already risen 1.4 degrees F (0.8 C) since 1850, so drastic cuts in emissions of climate-warming carbon dioxide are needed, according to Hare, now working at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany.
Has anyone yet proven with even some meaningful precision that global temperatures have risen 1.4 degrees since 1850?
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jan 14, 2009, 12:11 PM   #45  
Full Member
TexasParent is offline
 
TexasParent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
TexasParent See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
Since my team obviously has an aversion to playing past November I'm pulling for the team from their home away from home (which might change if they keep winning). Go Cards!

Q. What do you call 47 millionaires sitting around with their feet up, snacking and drinking beer while watching the Super Bowl on TV?

A. The Dallas Cowboys

Q. What do the Dallas Cowboys and Billy Graham have in common?

A. They both can make 70,000 people stand up and yell, "Jesus Christ."

Q. How do you keep a Dallas Cowboy out of your yard?

A. Put up a goal post.

Q. What do you call a Dallas Cowboy with a Super Bowl ring?

A. A thief.

Q. What's the difference between the Dallas Cowboys and a dollar bill?

A. You can still get four quarters out of a dollar bill.

Q. How many Dallas Cowboys does it take to win a Super Bowl?

A. Nobody remembers and we will very likely never find out!

Q. What do the Cowboys and a possums have in common?

A. Both play dead at home and get killed on the road!
Funny...thanks for that.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jan 14, 2009, 12:17 PM   #46  
Full Member
TexasParent is offline
 
TexasParent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
TexasParent See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by speechlesstx View Post
Here we go, Worldwatch says we must not only halt ALL carbon emissions by 2050, we must "go negative" after that.



Has anyone yet proven with even some meaningful precision that global temperatures have risen 1.4 degrees since 1850?
I'm not sure, but I saw a program on National Geographic last night that had some pictures of glaciers from 1956 which have receded drastically or disappeared entirely since that time, due to warmer temps.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jan 14, 2009, 01:12 PM   #47  
Ultra Member
tomder55 is offline
 
tomder55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,691
tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.tomder55 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Here is the bottom line. Obama has tabbed Carol Browner, a socialist flat -earth eviro-wacko ,to be his global warming czarina .Until last week,Browner was listed as one of the leaders of the Socialist International's Commission for a Sustainable World Society, which calls for "global governance." She demands that developed countries ,especially the U.S. accept draconian standards to reduce consumption and punitive limits on greenhouse gas emissions.

But beyond her radical ideology is there a hidden agenda to her advocacy ? Of Course !! Just like the Goracle ;she profits handsomly by taking extreme positions on carbon trading . She is on the board of directors of APX
Carol Browner Joins APX's Board of Directors
Quote:
APX is the leading infrastructure provider for environmental markets in greenhouse gases including carbon commodities. These commodities include emissions allowances and carbon offsets, sometimes called Verified Emission Reductions (VERs), Emission Reduction Units (ERUs), Certified Emission Reductions (CERs), Verified Carbon Units (VCUs), or Carbon Reduction Tons (CRTs).
Carbon Greenhouse Gas Market Infrastructure

So not only is there an ideological attempt at crippling the economy to pave the way for socialism, while granting unprecedented power to bureaucrats like Browner at play here . There's also money to be made .
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jan 15, 2009, 07:28 AM   #48  
Ultra Member
George_1950 is offline
 
George_1950's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,107
George_1950 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.George_1950 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.George_1950 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Send a message via Yahoo to George_1950
Quote:
Originally Posted by excon View Post

Look, I'm not a scientist... The Goricle has studied the issue. He makes as much sense as anybody does.... I certainy don't think he's looney!

The naysayers, however, make no sense at all. They just deny, deny, deny...

excon
Bw he he (I hate this for Chicagoans, but...) "A new record was set Wednesday when Chicago had its ninth consecutive day of measurable snowfall, according to the National Weather Service.
The previous record was eight consecutive days set from Dec. 13 to 20, 1973.
Snowfall records in Chicago date back to 1884.
A wind chill warning has been issued as temperatures as tsmperartures will not reach single digits until Friday.
The forecast for Thursday is: Sunny and cold, with a high near -3. Wind chill values as low as -33. West northwest wind between 10 and 15 mph." Record snowfall, plunging temperatures hit the area - Indian Head Park, IL - Indian Head Park Suburban Life

You may not be a scientist; neither am I. Common sense is not against the law, but Obama and the libs may yet 'change' that, too.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jan 15, 2009, 07:33 AM   #49  
Full Member
TexasParent is offline
 
TexasParent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 370
TexasParent See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Common sense says that one cold snap and record snowfalls in one year don't erase or reverse the trend for the last 15, 20 or 50 years.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Jan 15, 2009, 07:34 AM   #50  
Junior Member
JSingle911 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: WV
Posts: 35
JSingle911 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by George_1950 View Post
Bw he he (I hate this for Chicagoans, but...) "A new record was set Wednesday when Chicago had its ninth consecutive day of measurable snowfall, according to the National Weather Service.
The previous record was eight consecutive days set from Dec. 13 to 20, 1973.
Snowfall records in Chicago date back to 1884.
A wind chill warning has been issued as temperatures as tsmperartures will not reach single digits until Friday.
The forecast for Thursday is: Sunny and cold, with a high near -3. Wind chill values as low as -33. West northwest wind between 10 and 15 mph." Record snowfall, plunging temperatures hit the area - Indian Head Park, IL - Indian Head Park Suburban Life

You may not be a scientist; neither am I. Common sense is not against the law, but Obama and the libs may yet 'change' that, too.
I'm not a climate change alarmist, but I don't want people to disbelieve climate change for the wrong reasons. Local trends don't give you useful information about the entire planet.
  Reply With Quote
 
     

Answer this question

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Ask your question or search...

 




Similar Threads
Al Gore - the high priest of environmentalism - just a pop scientist?
(93 replies)
Did I miss Clinton/Gore defanging the Saddam tiger?
(8 replies)
Al Gore Set To Rake In Millions Off An IPO
(11 replies)
al gore and pres. bush
(4 replies)
Global Warming again. Al Gore, SHAME on you!
(20 replies)


Bookmarks and Sharing
bookmark twitter facebook

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Search this Thread

Advanced Search




Copyright ©2003 - 2010 - Advizo, LLC
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:08 PM.