Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
  Advanced
Register  |  Log in  
   Ask    
 Answer  
  Help  

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Law > Criminal Law   »   Who's liable for crimes commited using your 'former car'

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Question
 
 
#1  
Old Mar 19, 2007, 09:32 AM
znnjnn
New Member
znnjnn is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1
znnjnn See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Who's liable for crimes commited using your 'former car'

My mother in law had a car that she took to a shop for repairs..... It would cost $1000 to repair, more than the car was worth, so she decline to have it fixed (The car did not run at this point)... She gave the car to the repair shop. She cannot remember if she transferred the tittle, since this happened over three years ago.... I assume that it must still be in her name since the police tracked her down...
Anyways, she just received a call from police stating that this car has been been used in gas robberies, among other crimes, and that she is responsible for the stolen items and fines for that abandoned / impounded car, plus other fines....
I would understand if she was responsible for a fine for not properly ensuring that the title was transferred, but is she responsible for the crimes committed in this car?
What about the car shop? Would they be responsible for any of this, as they apparently did one of the following:
1) Fixed the car and used it for their own use (this would make me think they committed the crimes)
OR
2) Fixed the car and gave it away without notifying her (would this mean they stole the car?)
OR
3) Fixed the car and sold it (Would this mean that the profited from selling a stolen vehicle, if she were still found to be the legal owner)
As for the last two, the car repair shop, would at least have the name of the person they gave / sold the car to.... If this were the case, and they found the person that actually committed the crimes, would she still be held responsible as well?

Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Mar 19, 2007, 10:35 AM   #2  
Junior Member
ATYOURSERVICE is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CALIFORNIA
Posts: 144
ATYOURSERVICE See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I believe she can be held liable. Not specifically for committing the crime, but for damages and stolen goods if found in her car. SHE NEEDED TO TRANSFER THE TITLE WITHIN 10 DAYS of the sell. This is why the DMV emphasizes this. Their forms actually say "release your liability."

Seek a criminal defense attorney, not the public defender. They will want to negotiate your case.

Good luck to your mother in law.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Mar 19, 2007, 11:40 AM   #3  
Expert
excon is online now
 
excon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: On the outside
Posts: 9,185
excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.excon See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Hello znn:

She would be responsible for all the fines relating to the car such as towing, storage, impound fees, etc. Plus, if anyone was hurt or if damage was caused by the car, then she'd be liable for that too.

But she's NOT liable for crimes committed by anyone, other than herself. And, she is NOT liable for the stolen merchandise found in the car.

Yes, the repair shop has some culpability, but none that matters to your mother-in-law. She's responsible for what she's responsible for because of what she did, not because of what the repair shop did.

I doubt the cops told her that she had to pay anything for stolen stuff. That’s not what cops do.

Her next move depends on the cops next move.

excon
  Reply With Quote
 
     


Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors

Similar Threads
Question Asker Forum Answers Last Post
who is liable? cherryblossom43 Insurance 3 Mar 5, 2007 04:30 PM
Husband Liable? lhumbeutel Small Claims 0 Feb 8, 2007 11:42 AM
Who's liable - if anyone? excon Other Law 14 Jan 23, 2007 12:59 PM
liable for unknown debts? angelinafurcoat Divorce 2 Oct 9, 2005 03:07 PM
Serial killers making money off their crimes paulastenlund Crime 1 May 16, 2005 08:11 PM




Copyright ©2003 - 2007, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:38 AM.