It depend on where you are located and the rule of law they follow. Federal law is the most general, though many sated have chosen to provide morerights to their citizens than the federal law allows for.
So, here we are talking about essentially 4th Amendment issues (thought 5th and 6th do play into them fluidly).
The first question is was the stop lawful, to be lawful the police need only have a "reasonable suspicion" that a crime has been, is, or will be committed. Something more than a hunch but not quite probable cause either. Assuming they had a lawful reason to stop you, how did they "find" the drugs? Was the meth allegedly on your person? In the car? In the trunk?
You mentioned that the stop was for a traffic stop, what was it? Is it an arrestable offense in your jurisdiction? Did the police ask if they could searchyour car, what did you say?
At this point there are so many more questions than answers, I am afraid it is difficult to give you a straight answer.
Just to address the 6th month gap between the "find" and the search (assumably with a warrant). I would argue for drugs, the probable cause is stale and not sufficient to sustain a warrant 6 months later. I have seen the staleness argument work in many cases where drugs were the subject and the length of time was more than 2 weeks.
Hope some of this helps, I am sure your attorney will discuss this wilth you and then file motions to suppress and motion to dismiss.
Good luck,
Adam
|