At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them
answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in
answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you
will be able to:
Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+
topics.
As a gay man and Christian I was told by alot of people that homosexuals will not go to heaven but will go to hell instead. I know that alot of older people believe this and I think that is not true because god love everyone. He would not make homosexuals unless there is a chance of them going to heaven. My question is where (book and chapters) does it say that homosexuals will go to hell or where (book and chapter again) does it said that they will not or does it not say neither?
As a gay man and Christian I was told by alot of people that homosexuals will not go to heaven but will go to hell instead. I know that alot of older people believe this and I think that is not true because god love everyone. He would not make homosexuals unless there is a chance of them going to heaven. My question is where (book and chapters) does it say that homosexuals will go to hell or where (book and chapter again) does it said that they will not or does it not say neither?
Dear Brian,
isn't the Christian (NT) God a god of love, of benevolence? A god that has "nothing" with sex, as it is neither male or female itself?
Why would such a god even consider your sexual preference as a prohibition to enter heaven?
Any position pro or contra anything can be supported with quotes form the Bibe.
Example : You want war and suffering? Quote from the OT. You want love and peace? Quote from the NT.
One Bible, two totally opposing instructions!
Don't worry too much about going to heaven or not. Ask yourself if you even want to go to heaven if the god in charge of that heaven opposes homosexuality (and by doing so actually suggests that he made a "construction mistake" but blames you for your sexual disposition.
Better still ask yourself if such a god can really exist, or that it is just a chimera created by goodwilling people who wanted to serve humanity with creating some guidelines how to live, but went overboard with the framework that supported their mythology ....
There are a few questionable relationships in the Bible.
I think before anyone answers this question they should do a little research on the relationships between Ruth and Naomi, David and Jonathan, and Danial and Ashpenaz.
Really no, these are a few that the pro gay groups have tried to use over the years but there is no proof and the real issue is that people today want to judge relastionhips and customs from thier time to customs of ours and it just will not work that way.
But we have to remember that God is a God of love and FORGIVENESS but he is also a just God and one who is also a God of his word.
IT is not God that dooms us to hell, but Satan, and ourself. We are told his HOLY WORD, we are told what to do to be saved. And what actions are acceptable to him and which ones are not.
So it is us, that decide our fate. And God does not want any to perish, but it is our actions that decide it.
Really no, these are a few that the pro gay groups have tried to use over the years but there is no proof and the real issue is that people today want to judge relastionhips and customs from thier time to customs of ours and it just will not work that way.
It's funny you say that because that is the exact same reason I don't think anything in the Bible is for us today. Everything in it was written for people back then. Everything explained in it was by people who didn't know any better. For example back then if a volcano erupted it was an angry God who did it.
Quote:
the real issue is that people today want to judge relastionhips and customs from thier time to customs of ours and it just will not work that way.
I'm afraid thats not the case at all for example with the Ruth and Naomi, in Ruth 1:14 the hebrew word "clave" used in that verse, is identical to that used in the description of a heterosexual marriage in Genesis 2:24: " Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.
I think thats pretty clear. So I'm not judging by todays customs, I'm using their own customs. If the word meant something back then, thats what it means.
As far as the David and Jonathan?? C'mon they did some things I wouldn't chalk up to customs. I don't think getting naked, hugging and kissing between guys back then was looked upon any differently than it is today. I hardly think it was their way of saying hello. If someone were to see something like that then, they would think the same thing we would today. Wow, they must be lovers.
Now I will admit the case of Danial and Ashpenaz is a bit weird because they were both eunuchs. I read somewhere though that if males are castrated after puberty, they still retain sexual drive. So it's not totally out of the question.
ruth and naomi were daugter in-law and mother in-law, ruth married boaz...david and jonathan were best friends almost like friends, as it says in prverbs there is a friend that sticks closer than a brother...i really havent done much research on daniel and ashpenaz, but i will get back to you when i have.
Sin is defined as transgression of the law. Any transgression other than the sin against the Holy Ghost is forgivable, but has to be forsaken after forgivness. Same gender sex is probalby the most basic rejection of God possible. The first commandment to man was to replenish the earth. Something not possible by one gender. Same gender sex says to God, "you got it all wrong". God calls it confusion.
I have asked this question before but here we go again. Where in the bible does it talk about homosexuals? Some of you have told me that there are homosexuals in the bible like David and Johnathan. Where in the bible are they and why do some people say that homosexual is against god when it is in the bible? Can anyone answer that?
ruth and naomi were daugter in-law and mother in-law, ruth married boaz
This would not prevent a relationship, nor would it explain why the writers used the word they used in that passage above.
Quote:
david and jonathan were best friends almost like friends, as it says in prverbs there is a friend that sticks closer than a brother
The bible describes Davids love for Jonathan stronger(better if you will) than any love he ever had for a woman. I have had many male friends but I can ashure you I never felt that way for any of them.
Quote:
Same gender sex is probalby the most basic rejection of God possible.
God gave the gift of love, correct?? How is that gift different if it is with the same sex?? Why is someone expected to turn from the gift of love because somewhere along the line humans became homophobic?? The thing I find funny is outside the OT there really isn't much said about this subject. Jesus surly never taught against same sex marriage. I would think if it were that important Jesus/God would have said something about it during one of his sermons. Again I have to remind you that it is not a choice it's who they are. If it was something that was that important to God he in his all knowing and all powerful glory would have created us differently or made sure there was no way in hell people of the same sex were attracted to each other.
Gen 19:5
5 And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them.
(KJV)
Lev 18:22
22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
(KJV)
Lev 20:13
13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.
(KJV)
Matt 19:4
4 And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female,
(KJV) This statement was made in the context of a question about divorce, but the plain statement remains, so Jesus did address the subject.
Rom 1:24-28
24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
(KJV)
1 Cor 6:9
9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
(KJV)
(definition of abusers of themselves with mankind)
733 arsenokoites (ar-sen-ok-oy'-tace);
from 730 and 2845; a sodomite:
KJV-- abuser of (that defileself) with mankind.
Onan and a few others wish to pervert the word of God but why I can say his ideas are not only silly but not possible, is the bible has never held back telling us of the sin of the early leaders, We know there were many sins of the flesh, murders, and more. So from seeing this, if there was a sinful relastionship going on, they would have told us. As an example of how they were either punished for thier sin, or forgiven when they repented.
But you were given some examples, it is clear beyond a doub it is a sin, and that of course is the issue I have with MOST gays, they will not just admit this is a sin. The drunk or the person living in adultry, all will normally admit if they are living in sin, and not try to change God's word to make it appear they are living God's will.
Don't worry too much about going to heaven or not.
Yes. First things first. The best preparation for the next life is to live this one wisely and well.
How you interpret and act on your sexual urges has far more serious consequences for this life than for the next. Whether you're hetero- or homo-, if you live a long time, sex will probably cease to be much of a concern long before you die. Keep it in perspective.