Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
  Advanced
Register  |  Log in  
   Ask    
 Answer  
  Help  

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Society & Culture > Religion > Christianity   »   Should a Christian allow those taking the lead in the Church such as Ministers be gay

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Question
 
 
#1  
Old Jul 29, 2007, 11:20 AM
Hope12's Avatar
Hope12
Junior Member
Hope12 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 132
Hope12 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Should a Christian allow those taking the lead in the Church such as Ministers be gay

I believe that no man or women should ever be allowed to serve as a minster or a leader of any church that represents God. Why?

To be frank, the Bible condemns homosexuality. No amount of verbal hocus-pocus can make scriptures like Leviticus 18:22 and Romans 1:26, 27 disappear.

1 Corinthians 6:9-11 (New King James Version)
New King James Version (NKJV)
Copyright 1982 by Thomas Nelson, Inc.

9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals,[a] nor sodomites, 10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God.

Mankind has become very tolerant and will make all kinds of excuses and take the Bible and twist it to fit what they want it to, so as to do their own thing. They even go as far as saying that if a Christian is to love all people then they need to love the gay person. As a Christian myself, I do love all people including homosexuals, I though hate their behavior and their choice to go against God's laws. I am able to separate the person from their behavior or actions. God does not approve of homosexuality but He also does not approve of a Christian treating anyone harshly or to hate them in any way. I also feel that gays are welcome into the the congregation I attend, but they will be asked to respect God's house by obeying His commandments and laws about proper conduct. A gay person would not be serving as a leader in the congregation that I attend. How could they? They are suppose to be representing the supreme Sovereign of the universe. They can not serve God and Satan. The Bible forcefully admonishes, "O you lovers of God hate what is bad." Psalm 97:10 Homosexuals who want to serve God must do so on his terms, not there own.

If Leaders in the Congregation of God allows these gays to enter into a leader position and to try to teach others to do God's will and they themselves are not obedient to God's laws, and they approve of homosexuals becoming priest and leaders of their church, this is detestable in God's eyes and I truly feel sorry for the future generations. Gay or homosexual behavior is not approved by God nor should their conduct be welcomed in any place of worship of those claiming to serve God.

As a minister of God, I welcome all persons gay, straight, thieves, murders and sinners, but once you enter the congregation of God, all the conduct that God does not approve of will never be welcomed. We can not serve the God of the Bible and not obey his laws against homosexuality. Sodom and Gomorrah were destroy in Lots day. Why? Homosexuality was one of the reasons. One reason I don't go to the churches of this world is because of this very thing. As a Christian, Jesus Christ is the head of the Congregation. Those who take the lead in the congregation must become workers for the members of the congregation, under Christ. There are requirements that those taking the lead in the congregational affairs must adhere to. Notice what the Bible says these qualification are. Here is God's view on the matter.

I quote:
(1 Timothy 3:1-7) 3 That statement is faithful. If any man is reaching out for an office of overseer, he is desirous of a fine work. 2The overseer should therefore be irrepressible, a husband of one wife, moderate in habits, sound in mind, orderly, hospitable, qualified to teach, 3not a drunken brawler, not a smiter, but reasonable, not belligerent, not a lover of money, 4a man presiding over his own household in a fine manner, having children in subjection with all seriousness; 5(if indeed any man does not know how to preside over his own household, how will he take care of God's congregation?) 6not a newly converted man, for fear that he might get puffed up [with pride] and fall into the judgment passed upon the Devil. 7Moreover, he should also have a fine testimony from people on the outside, in order that he might not fall into reproach and a snare of the Devil.

(Titus 1:5-9) 5For this reason I left you in Crete, that you might correct the things that were defective and might make appointments of older men in city after city, as I gave you orders; 6if there is any man free from accusation, a husband of one wife, having believing children that were not under a charge of debauchery nor unruly. 7For an overseer must be free from accusation as God's steward, not self-willed, not prone to wrath, not a drunken brawler, not a smiter, not greedy of dishonest gain, 8but hospitable, a lover of goodness, sound in mind, righteous, loyal, self-controlled, 9holding firmly to the faithful word as respects his [art of] teaching, that he may be able both to exhort by the teaching that is healthful and to reprove those who contradict.

1 Thess. 4:3-8: "This is what God wills ... that you abstain from fornication; that each one of you should know how to get possession of his own vessel in sanctification and honor, not in covetous sexual appetite such as also those nations have which do not know God; that no one go to the point of harming and encroach upon the rights of his brother in this matter, because God is one who exacts punishment for all these things, just as we told you beforehand and also gave you a thorough witness. For God called us, not with allowance for uncleanness, but in connection with sanctification. So, then, the man that shows disregard is disregarding, not man, but God, who puts his holy spirit in you."

Eph. 5:5: "No fornicator or unclean person or greedy person-which means being an idolater-has any inheritance in the kingdom of the Christ and of God."
People do change though and many who used to practice homosexuality are now Christians and serving God and obeying his laws. They learn God's way of Cleanliness and they have changed their ways to gain God's approval and with His approval comes many blessings. You see, God is love and he does forgive, if we choose to obey Him and do things his way, not the way of this world. God wants his followers and servants to be clean because He is clean. Anyone overseeing the Christian congregation therefore will have to be clean in God's eyes.

Comments?
Take care,
Hope12

 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Jul 29, 2007, 03:58 PM   #2  
Christianity Expert
Fr_Chuck is offline
 
Fr_Chuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 28,011
Fr_Chuck has disabled reputation
Those that live a life style where they are living with someone they are not married to, should not be a leader in a church.

So they can not be living unmarried to a man or women and be a leader.
Also marriage is considered by the church as a union of a man and women, so that leads gays out.

Those chuches that allow this are no longer truly Christian.

Comments on this post
Hope12 agrees: I must agree that any church allow gay men and women to serve as priest are not Christian. What church do you belong to?
Pete Hanysz : The man is an idiot!
 
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 29, 2007, 05:25 PM   #3  
Ultra Member
Choux is offline
 
Choux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: ChicagoLand
Posts: 2,571
Choux See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Choux See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Choux See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Religion is in a bind, especially Roman Catholicism, because being a Minister or Priest attracts male homosexuals, just like hair dressing and interior decorating. Always the scandals as the church members get outraged when their minister turns out to be gay.

In the American Catholic Church it is estimated that 50% or so of priests are homosexuals.
Being a minister is not an attractive job for a healthy heterosexual male in Catholic America; there is a shortage and priests are imported from Latin America and other countries such as India.

I have never seen statistics on FundiEv Christian churches, but there is always some kind of sexual scandal in the news, not necessarily over homosexuality. Recently, we had Ted Haggard seeing a homosexual prostitute. After he left his large mega church, the membership dropped precipitously. Who can forget Swaggert, Bakker and the others? FundEv ministers who are ambitious are able to make an extremely good living blowing smoke and staging mirrors so their faithful are lulled to sleep.

It would be wonderful if there were more Billy Grahams, but that era has passed, unfortunately.
 
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 29, 2007, 08:16 PM   #4  
Dogs Expert
labman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northern US
Posts: 10,624
labman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.labman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.labman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.labman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.labman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.labman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
As commissioner to Presbytery, I was part of voting down ordaining any not living in fidelity in marriage or chastity several years ago. Unfortunately the church leaders are allowing homosexuals to flout the constitution.

If enforced, it would also deny most lay leadership roles in the PCUSA

Comments on this post
Hope12 agrees: Having said that, what should one do if they belong to a church where the leaders allow gays? Get out, right?
 
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 30, 2007, 01:55 PM   #5  
Ultra Member
ebaines is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Illinois, US
Posts: 2,373
ebaines See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ebaines See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.ebaines See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by labman
As commissioner to Presbytery, I was part of voting down ordaining any not living in fidelity in marriage or chastity several years ago. USA
In other words Labman, you would not disqualify a person from being ordained (or being your own minister) if that person was homosexual, but chaste. Well, that's a good starting point.

I guess someone here has to stick up for the liberal wings of the various US denominations that have ordained openly gay clergy - it may as well be me. I understand that anyone on this board whose religious views are driven by a belief in the literal interpretation of the english language version(s) of the bible is not likely to be persuaded. However, a few points to ponder:

As I believe Labman would agree, one can be gay and non-sexually active and still be ordained and could make a terrific minister or priest. Anyone disagree?

So let's address the issue of ordaining homosexuals who are in active, committed, monogamous, and loving relationships - that's where most of the controversy lies. The english language translations for many of the biblical passages regarding homosexuality inevitably are about male prostitution and promiscuousness. The concept of sexual orientation as we understand it today wasn't even considered back when the bible was formulated - for example, any male-on-male sexual activity in those days was considered a form of prostitution because people who did this there were inevitably involved with multiple partners, performing in orgies, etc. The bible is virtually silent on the issue of homosexuality between committed, monogamous, and loving partners.

Much of the argument in the liberal denominations in support of ordaining openly gay clergy has been based on a model of balancing (a) scripture, (b) reason, and (c) traditions in determining what the church should do on this issue. If you believe that only (a) applies, then there's no reason to be against slavery (which no where does the bible condemn) or child labor, or supportive of women's rights, at least from a religious perspective. The more liberal denominations have tended to believe that the bible should be read and understand in terms of broad themes, such as loving one's neighbor, forgiveness of sins, etc., and not so much word-for-word analysis of passages written by men from cultures long ago. These denominations do not believe the bible is inerrant, especially as translated into english by men who most certainly had their own biases. They also firmly believe that homosexuality and heterosexuality are not choices, but are part of who each of us are, and so to treat homosexuality as inherently evil is counter to the notion that we are all God's children. And once again, to be clear, we are talking only about people who are in committed, monogamous, and loving relationships, which is a concept the bible does not address.

Comments on this post
tamed agrees: Full of insight!
Hope12 agrees: Please read Genesis 19:4-22 and (1 Corinthians 6:9) What! Do YOU not know that unrighteous persons will not inherit God’s kingdom? Do not be misled. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men kept for unnatural purposes, nor men who
 
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 30, 2007, 02:04 PM   #6  
-
Canada_Sweety is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada!<3
Posts: 597
Canada_Sweety See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
I'm all for equal rights (because of one of my best friends) but in all honesty, no, a person who is gay/lesbian should not be aloud to be a church leader. It is a sin and it would set a bad example unto the rest of the congregation.

Comments on this post
SnaveLeber : definitely agree
Hope12 agrees: You are cdrrect God condemns homosexuality of all kinds.
 
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 30, 2007, 08:50 PM   #7  
Ultra Member
Skell is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,927
Skell See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Skell See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Skell See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Skell See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Skell See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Skell See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Oh the intolerance.

Justifies why many don't belong to churches / groups who judge so ignorantly.

They have their own relationships.

Comments on this post
tamed agrees: Finaly a voice of REASON!!
TheSavage agrees: so true -- the above posts are why if I was a follower I would reject their god-- Savage
 
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 30, 2007, 09:52 PM   #8  
-
SnaveLeber is offline
 
SnaveLeber's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 77
SnaveLeber See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
YESS!!! YOU FREAKIN ROCK!!! SOMEBODY THROW YOU A COOKIE!!! So many time i want people to understand that just because you are homosexual does not mean you are any worse than anyone else. we have all fallen short and the wages of ANY sin is death... but you have to make the committment to change, out of love. Freaking bonus points to you
 
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 30, 2007, 10:22 PM   #9  
-
Starman is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 1,352
Starman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.Starman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
The Bible has a definition for chastity which makes certain lifestyles incompatible with its definition. In short, a murderer, habitual, thief, habitual liar, adulterer, fornicator, idol worshipper, habiutual sloth, a person who is habitiually violent, or even one who entertains evil thoughts though he doesn't carry them out doesn't qualify as being virtuous. Now, we can disagree, ignore, and go our own way. But what we cannot say is that the Bible approves of these behaviors. Only that WE don't see it the way that the Bible sees it and bvased on that we will classify these behaviors as we see fit.

As for intolerance, the Bible doesn't describe God as tolerant of all behavior. It is very specific in telling us that he does view certain behaviors as wrong. Actually, only an idiot would be tolerant of all behaviors since many behaviors are violations of the human rights of others and toleration of them would lead to anarchy.

Comments on this post
Hope12 agrees: (1 Corinthians 6:9) What! Do YOU not know that unrighteous persons will not inherit God’s kingdom? Do not be misled. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men kept for unnatural purposes, nor men who lie with men.
 
 
     
 
 
Old Jul 30, 2007, 10:35 PM   #10  
Relationship Expert
talaniman is offline
 
talaniman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Space Is The Place
Posts: 18,035
talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.talaniman See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Also marriage is considered by the church as a union of a man and women, so that leads gays out.
You mean single gay people who are chaste, cannot be a model or leader, in the christian church??? You mean they can't have a same sex roommate either???

Comments on this post
Hope12 agrees: (1 Corinthians 6:9) What! Do YOU not know that unrighteous persons will not inherit God’s kingdom? Do not be misled. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men kept for unnatural purposes, nor men who lie with men,
TheSavage agrees: hope -- when all you do is post the same hateful verses you get nowhere. ps have any shrimp resently?-- Savage
 
 
     

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors

Similar Threads
Question Asker Forum Answers Last Post
My gay friends tell me my new love interest is gay Girl 425 Adult Sexuality 11 Jun 6, 2008 06:12 PM
Australian Prime ministers Kim Ainsworth Politics 3 Apr 30, 2007 07:43 PM
Anglican Church/Church of England questions Emland Christianity 0 Apr 30, 2007 10:38 AM
how thick is the lead in a lead joint crrobbins7 Plumbing 2 Feb 25, 2007 07:21 PM
prime ministers and presidents catting Politics 8 Sep 22, 2006 02:34 AM




Copyright ©2003 - 2007, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:48 AM.