Ask Experts Questions for FREE Help!
  Advanced
Register  |  Log in  
   Ask    
 Answer  
  Help  

Ask QuestionsprogressAnswer QuestionsprogressBuild ReputationprogressBecome an Expert
 
Free Answers in 3 Easy Steps

Register Now
3 Steps

At Ask Me Help Desk you can ask questions in any topic and have them answered for free by our experts. To ask questions or participate in answering them you must register for a free account. By registering you will be able to:
  • Get free answers from experts in any of our 300+ topics.
  • Accept money for answers that you provide.
  • Communicate privately with other members (PM).
  • See fewer ads.

Home > Society & Culture > Religion > Christianity   »   Hell!

 
Question Tools Search this Question Display Modes
Question
 
 
#1  
Old Sep 16, 2005, 02:47 PM
Bobbye
Junior Member
Bobbye is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 42
Bobbye See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Hell!

DOES HELL EXIST?

The Bible speaks more of Hell than of Heaven. Jesus said it and that settles it!

What think ye?
Bobbye


Comments on this post
Starman disagrees: Jesus did not always speak literally.
Reply With Quote
 
     

Answers
 
 
Old Sep 16, 2005, 07:16 PM   #2  
Morganite
Senior Member
Morganite is offline
 
Morganite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 867
Morganite See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Hell

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobbye
DOES HELL EXIST?

The Bible speaks more of Hell than of Heaven. Jesus said it and that settles it!

What think ye?
Bobbye


"Hell" makes its first appearance in the bible in Dt 32.22. In Hebrew, it is sh'owl {sheh-ole'} or shol {sheh-ole'}

Like all Hebrew nouns it has a wide semantic range and the exact meaning is determined by the context.

Variously, it is used to refer to, sheol, the underworld, the grave, the pit, the underworld.

Sheol in the the OT is the designation for the abode of the dead,referred also as, "place of no return" (after the babylonians), The wicked are said to be sent there as a punishment after judgement, and the righteous are promised that they will not be abandoned to it.

What the OT does not say, apart from the 'underworld' hint, is precisely where or exactly what it is.

It is spoken of as a place of sorrow: (2 Samuel 22:6)
The sorrows of hell compassed me about; the snares of death prevented me;

It was spoken of as being in the opposite direction to heaven: (Job 11:8)
It is as high as heaven; what canst thou do? deeper than hell; what canst thou know?

The 'wicked' will be sent there, as well as 'the nations' that forget God. (Psalms 9:17)
The wicked shall be turned into hell, [and] all the nations that forget God.

Hell is considered a place of temporary punishment or distress, for David exclaims: (Psalms 16:10) For thou wilt not leave my soul in hell; (Psalms 116:3-4) The sorrows of death compassed me, and the pains of hell gat hold upon me: I found trouble and sorrow. Then called I upon the name of the LORD; O LORD, I beseech thee, deliver my soul.

Jonah uses the idea of of hell as an analogy for his ordeal inide the belly of the great fish: (Jonah 2:2) And said, I cried by reason of mine affliction unto the LORD, and he heard me; out of the belly of hell cried I, [and] thou heardest my voice.

Jesus uses the word 'geennn' or 'gehenna,' which is the Valley of the Hinnom, a wide vale that runs down the western edge of the holy city and then sweeps around the south side, outside the city walls. It was an ideal simile fo an unpleasant place, because it was the city dump, and animal corpses, dung, and trash fires made the smell permanently offensive. (Matthew 5:22) But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.

In Matthew 16:18, Jesus uses a different term - Hades. And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

Hades, or Pluto, was the god of the lower regions in Greek mythology, and was adopted by Jews as part of the Hellenization that swept the Near East after Alexander's conquest. It also referred to Orcus, the nether world, the realm of the dead, and eventually came to mean the grave, and death itself.

In 2 Peter 2:4, a different word is used to convey a similar meaning: tartaroo {tar-tar-o'-o}, which, although a verb, meant the name of the subterranean region, doleful and dark, regarded by the ancient Greeks as the abode of the wicked dead, where they suffer punishment for their evil deeds. It answers to Gehenna of the Jews, the verb serving in its meanings: to thrust down to Tartarus, or to hold captive in Tartarus.

There is a developmentevident in the idea of what hell was, owing more to the Greek influence than to biblical doctrine, which is not very forthcoming about hell.

Jesus came into the world to ransom it. Through his atonement we were bought from death and hell. Death and hell were paid—paid in full—and Christ was the only one who could pay that debt.

What did Paul mean when he said we were "bought with a price?" What does Jesus mean when he calls himself our "Redeemer?" If we were not bought, if we were not ransomed by Jesus Christ, then we would be still in our sins, still subject to death and hell.

Quite generally the idea has been taught that man is either to be saved in the kingdom of God or cast into hell. He is either in the presence of God, or else in the presence of the devil.

No other place is provided where a man could go who is unworthy of the presence of the Lord and yet not worthy of the condemnation with Lucifer.

Is such a thought consistent? With serious reflection, can we believe that our Almighty God who is all-wise and just, has arranged salvation and damnation on any such foundation as this?

In his Divine Comedy, Dante depicts the doctrine of damnation for unfortunate souls who died without a knowledge of Christ, as that doctrine was taught in the 13th century. According to the story, Dante is lost in the woods where he is met by the Roman poet, Virgil, who promises to show him the punishment of hell and purgatory, and later, he is to have a view of paradise.

He follows the Roman poet through hell and later into Limbo, which (according to the story) is the first circle of hell. Here are confined the souls of those who lived virtuous and honorable lives, but because they were not baptized, these souls merit punishment and are denied forever the blessings of salvation.

As Dante looks upon these miserable souls in the upper stratum of hell, and sees, as the story says, "Many and vast, Of men, women and infants," he marvels. His guide asks the question, "Inquirest thou not what spirits Are those which thou beholdest?"

Dante, showing a desire to know, the guide continues: "I would thou know, that these of sin Were blameless; and if aught they merited, It profits not, since baptism was not theirs, The portal of thy faith. If they before The Gospel lived, they served not God aright; And among them such am I. For these defects, And for no other evil, we are lost; Only so far afflicted that we live Desiring without hope."

In answer to the earnest inquiry of his mortal guest, who desires to know if any thus punished ever had the privilege of coming forth from this sad condition of torment, that is, escaping from Hell, the spirit-poet declares that the righteous, who had known God from our first parents down to the time of Christ, have been "to bliss exalted," but of these unfortunates who never heard of Christ, he says, "Be thou assured, no spirit of human kind was ever saved."

Dante was not the author of this unfortunate doctrine. What a shame it is that this same awful doctrine has come resounding down from that distant day, and has been made to repeat its terrible threat of torment in the ears of earnest souls who have sought the salvation of loved ones who have gone before.

I do not believe that hell is a place where the wicked are being burned forever, and from which there is no escape, and, taken all in all, I do not believe that the Bile teaches otherwise.



MORGANITE


Comments on this post
Starman agrees: Well said!
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Sep 17, 2005, 12:24 PM   #3  
MaggieB
New Member
MaggieB is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 22
MaggieB See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Hell

My belief of which I garnered from the Word of God is that "hell" is a place of "eternal" punishment and sorrow, it is real.

In the OT, Psalm 49:10-15 hints of hell.

Matthew 5:21-30 and Romans 8:1-16 tells us to avoid it.

Matthew 13:24-30 and 36-43 relates it is for evildoers

2 Thessalonians !:3-12, Jude 5-13, and revelation 20:11-14 speaks of punishment in hell.

Jude 17-23 speaks of keeping others away from hell.

Hell is real!!!

Bless you,
MaggieB

Comments on this post
Bobbye agrees: Outstanding!
txgreasemonkey agrees: We spend eternity in either heaven of hell.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Sep 21, 2005, 05:48 AM   #4  
chrisl
Junior Member
chrisl is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 83
chrisl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaggieB
Matthew 13:24-30 and 36-43 relates it is for evildoers
This view is certainly understandable if one reads the King James Version (KJV). Yet this position is not supported by the account in Acts 2:27-31 which tells us Jesus was in hell at one point, and he was certainly not an evildoer!

Have you noticed that the KJV uses "hell" in these and other scriptures but many modern translations (including, oddly enough, the New King James Version) use "hades" or "the grave" instead? It is not surprising since many churches have moved away from the hellfire doctrine in the years since the KJV was produced, although many others still teach it.

I agree with Genesis 3:19, which tells us that death is a consequence of Adam's sin and it means a return to the earth from which we were made. Where were we before we had life? Nowhere. We simply did not exist--no consciousness, no thought, no being. That is also the condition of the dead and that is what the Bible means by "hades" in the NT and "sheol" in the OT. It is described at Ecclesiastes 9:5,10 and also by Jesus at John 11:11-14. Individuals in hades are unconscious, or "sleeping" as Jesus so lovingly explained, and their future hope is the resurrection, as Jesus demonstrated in the case of Lazarus.

Gehenna, which is also translated as "hell" in the KJV and other Bibles, is different. It represents the condition of death without hope of a resurrection. In effect, it is a judgment and condemnation. Readers should use discernment (and a good lexicon or concordance) when considering how "hades", "gehenna", "tartarus" and "sheol" are rendered in their Bibles. The differences are significant.

Revelation 20:14 is interesting because it shows that hell/hades itself will eventually "die" (ie, be destroyed forever) in "the second death" represented by the lake of fire. That shows that hell/hades and the lake of fire are not the same. It also means that death due to the sin of Adam will eventually cease. (Compare 1 Corinthians 15:26.)

That's good news!

Chris
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Oct 1, 2005, 04:31 AM   #5  
chrisl
Junior Member
chrisl is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 83
chrisl See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Found a relevant article online

If you're interested in what Jehovah's Witnesses believe about this topic, you may want to take a look at the series of articles on hell in the 15 July 2002 Watchtower magazine.

Chris
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Oct 1, 2005, 09:50 PM   #6  
phildebenham
Junior Member
phildebenham is offline
 
phildebenham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 95
phildebenham See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Curiouser and curiouser

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisl
If you're interested in what Jehovah's Witnesses believe about this topic, you may want to take a look at the series of articles on hell in the 15 July 2002 Watchtower magazine.

Chris

Why is it that Jehovah's Witness' all believe the same thing on all doctrine? It seems to me that in order to be a Jehovah's Witness you must be willing to have your mind made up for you. That has been my experience when talking to them. They are told what they do and do not believe and they do not deviate from that (if they do they are disfellowshipped). Odd behavior for those who claim to be seeking biblical truth.

Just my thoughts........

Phil
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Oct 2, 2005, 03:39 AM   #7  
speedball1
Plumbing Expert
speedball1 is online now
 
speedball1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sarasota, Fl.
Posts: 13,327
speedball1 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speedball1 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speedball1 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speedball1 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speedball1 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speedball1 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speedball1 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.speedball1 See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Pay to call speedball1 for advice ($.95/min)
Call speedball1 via Skype™
Why is it that Jehovah's Witness' all believe the same thing on all doctrine? It seems to me that in order to be a Jehovah's Witness you must be willing to have your mind made up for you. That has been my experience when talking to them. They are told what they do and do not believe and they do not deviate from that

Isn't that the way with every religion? You are told what to believe , if not in the Bible then from the pulpit. To question is to commit heresy and if you don't believe and follow the doctrine of your particular sect ,then you're just not a "good Christian".
Tell me what religion allows you to question it and to place their tenets under skeptical analysis? To me ALL RELIGIONS practice some sort of mind control.
I dunno who said it but I certainly agree, "Religion began when the first priest met the first fool. Just a few thoughts from a free thinker.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Oct 2, 2005, 06:37 AM   #8  
NeedKarma
Ultra Member
NeedKarma is offline
 
NeedKarma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,934
NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.NeedKarma See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedball1
Why is it that Jehovah's Witness' all believe the same thing on all doctrine? It seems to me that in order to be a Jehovah's Witness you must be willing to have your mind made up for you. That has been my experience when talking to them. They are told what they do and do not believe and they do not deviate from that

Isn't that the way with every religion? You are told what to believe , if not in the Bible then from the pulpit. To question is to commit heresy and if you don't believe and follow the doctrine of your particular sect ,then you're just not a "good Christian".
Tell me what religion allows you to question it and to place their tenets under skeptical analysis? To me ALL RELIGIONS practice some sort of mind control.
I dunno who said it but I certainly agree, "Religion began when the first priest met the first fool. Just a few thoughts from a free thinker.
You took the words right out of my mouth. Well said.
  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Oct 2, 2005, 07:11 AM   #9  
Morganite
Senior Member
Morganite is offline
 
Morganite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 867
Morganite See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Jehovah's Witnesses

Quote:
Originally Posted by phildebenham
Why is it that Jehovah's Witness' all believe the same thing on all doctrine? It seems to me that in order to be a Jehovah's Witness you must be willing to have your mind made up for you. That has been my experience when talking to them. They are told what they do and do not believe and they do not deviate from that (if they do they are disfellowshipped). Odd behavior for those who claim to be seeking biblical truth.

Just my thoughts........

Phil

I thought about this for a moment or two before asking how anyone can possily know what all of anything believes. Do Jehovah's and Baptists, and Whatevers have machines that can read their minds? If a guy is sitting in a pew singing along with the hymnsheet how is it possible to know what reservations or innovations he holds in his mind?

On the other hand, what did Paul say? (Philippians 2:5) Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus. Unless there were many different ands differing minds in Christ, to follow Him is to have the one mind whoever you are.

What else did he say? Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions amongst you: but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment, for it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions amongst you.

The Holy Word of God approves, nay, demands, of believers that they "all believe the same thing on all doctrine" Who can find fault with that?




MORGANITE


  Reply With Quote
 
     
 
 
Old Oct 2, 2005, 01:01 PM   #10  
phildebenham
Junior Member
phildebenham is offline
 
phildebenham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 95
phildebenham See this member's comment history on his/her Profile page.
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedball1
Isn't that the way with every religion? You are told what to believe , if not in the Bible then from the pulpit. To question is to commit heresy and if you don't believe and follow the doctrine of your particular sect ,then you're just not a "good Christian".
Tell me what religion allows you to question it and to place their tenets under skeptical analysis? To me ALL RELIGIONS practice some sort of mind control.
I dunno who said it but I certainly agree, "Religion began when the first priest met the first fool. Just a few thoughts from a free thinker.

Christianity, not a denomination or a sect, but Christianity itself, requires you to question what you are taught. When Paul taught the Bareans they were commended for searching the scriptures to see if the things Paul taught were true. The only "mind control" in true, biblical, Christianity, is the sincere seeking to have the "mind of Christ" in all matters. This, in itself, shows the need to be open to the teaching of the Word of God regardless of what one hears from teachers and preachers whoever they be. Skeptical analysis is exactly what the Bareans were commended for.

Many so-called "christian" groups do attempt control the beliefs of their adherants to the degree that adheants are not "allowed" to deviate from the groups teachings no matter what. Frank Sandford's "Holy Ghost and Us bible school" and "Shiloh" in Durham, Maine from the late 1800's to early 1900's is an outstanding example of this type of group (see "Fair, Clear, and Terrible" by Shirley Nelson.) Argueably the most prevelent group extant today to practice this type of "mind control" is the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society (Jehovah's Witnesses), but there are many such groups ("The House of Yahweh" in Abilene, Tx. for example) that are equally and even more controlling.

This is not how the Church of God ought to be, nor is it what the bible teaches. This type of controlling abuse occurs not only in psuedo-biblical cults like the Jehovah's Witnesses and the House of Yahweh, but also in some more doctrinally sound churches as well. A good book on this subject is "Churches that Abuse" by Ronald M. Enroth (and it's sequel "Recovering from Churches that Abuse").

Now, you have stated also that we are told what to believe from the bible, and you are correct, we are. On the major tenents of Christianity the bible is very clear and we are taught, as Christians, to be of the same mind concerning these, and not to be mislead by those who teach contrary to the sound doctrine of the Word of God. I fail to see, however, that this is mind control. Christians, like myself, believe that God has given us His word through the bible. It is not mind control that we search it for truth and even test it to see whether it is true. Christianity is not meant to be a religion of blind faith. Indeed, we are called to come to Christ with our eyes wide open! We are called to study the scriptures and question our beliefs as well as the beliefs of others. Christianity does not tell us to believe blindly, but to know what we believe and why.

Phil Debenham
  Reply With Quote
 
     


Question Tools Search this Question
Search this Question:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

 
Similar Sponsors

Similar Questions
Question Asker Topic Answers Last Post
different degrees of hell orange Other Religion 46 May 19, 2006 01:20 PM
i have no idea what the hell i want to do xsjado Other Careers 2 Feb 1, 2006 06:01 AM
Scared as Hell!!! putmusic2rtrbles Forensic Science 2 Nov 15, 2005 10:53 AM
Download Trojan From Hell!! Loriz Spyware, Viruses, etc. 5 Oct 20, 2005 05:42 AM
What the hell do i keep doing wrong Boo Radley Teens 2 Dec 14, 2004 11:19 PM




Copyright ©2003 - 2007, Ask Me Help Desk.
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:56 AM.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.