I think Olivia Judson makes a really good case for why evolutionary theory should be taught in public school science curricula. What do you think?
NOTE: I'm posting this in Biology instead of Religious Discussions for a reason. If you have a religious point to make on this topic, please start your own thread on a religious forum, or contribute to one of the many threads on the topic already active there.
Evolution is a theory so I think that any theory should be also at least mention the other theories. Shouldn't a good scientist be looking at all avenues and coming to their conclusions based on all things?
We'd like to understand what you find wrong with N0help4u's answer:
What's inaccurate about this answer? Say it in 25 words or less here and/or reply in the thread with more detail.
Please focus on the content not the person!
Link to a credible and well-known source. You can provide a URL or simply describe the source.
Evolution is a theory so I think that any theory should be also at least mention the other theories. Shouldn't a good scientist be looking at all avenues and coming to their conclusions based on all things?
We'd like to understand what you find wrong with Capuchin's answer:
What's inaccurate about this answer? Say it in 25 words or less here and/or reply in the thread with more detail.
Please focus on the content not the person!
Link to a credible and well-known source. You can provide a URL or simply describe the source.
We'd like to understand what you find wrong with N0help4u's answer:
What's inaccurate about this answer? Say it in 25 words or less here and/or reply in the thread with more detail.
Please focus on the content not the person!
Link to a credible and well-known source. You can provide a URL or simply describe the source.
We'd like to understand what you find wrong with NeedKarma's answer:
What's inaccurate about this answer? Say it in 25 words or less here and/or reply in the thread with more detail.
Please focus on the content not the person!
Link to a credible and well-known source. You can provide a URL or simply describe the source.
We'd like to understand what you find wrong with Capuchin's answer:
What's inaccurate about this answer? Say it in 25 words or less here and/or reply in the thread with more detail.
Please focus on the content not the person!
Link to a credible and well-known source. You can provide a URL or simply describe the source.
Like I said I did NOT say teach other theories but mention there ARE other theories
AND wouldn't a good scientist present here are the theories that prove evolution and
These are the theories that say it can't be?
I was taught a good scientist uses all available theories and hypothesis to come to a conclusion.
We'd like to understand what you find wrong with N0help4u's answer:
What's inaccurate about this answer? Say it in 25 words or less here and/or reply in the thread with more detail.
Please focus on the content not the person!
Link to a credible and well-known source. You can provide a URL or simply describe the source.
Like I said I did NOT say teach other theories but mention there ARE other theories
AND wouldn't a good scientist present here are the theories that prove evolution and
These are the theories that say it can't be?
I was taught a good scientist uses all available theories and hypothesis to come to a conclusion.
You seem to be confusing what a theory is. There are no "theories that prove evolution and theories that say it can't be". Evolution is itself a theory. There are no other theories that explain how life got from a single self-replicating molecule to the diverse range of life we see today. The theory of evolution is the only theory.
We'd like to understand what you find wrong with Capuchin's answer:
What's inaccurate about this answer? Say it in 25 words or less here and/or reply in the thread with more detail.
Please focus on the content not the person!
Link to a credible and well-known source. You can provide a URL or simply describe the source.
We'd like to understand what you find wrong with N0help4u's answer:
What's inaccurate about this answer? Say it in 25 words or less here and/or reply in the thread with more detail.
Please focus on the content not the person!
Link to a credible and well-known source. You can provide a URL or simply describe the source.
Wow... You don't think that the assumptions he makes even on the first page are somewhat ridiculous? That it's a "natural law" that every thing happens more than once?
We'd like to understand what you find wrong with Capuchin's answer:
What's inaccurate about this answer? Say it in 25 words or less here and/or reply in the thread with more detail.
Please focus on the content not the person!
Link to a credible and well-known source. You can provide a URL or simply describe the source.
As I understand it, according to Evolution Theory, in the vast passage of time in the past a species has gradually evolved (and will evolve in future) into another species when (1) the instinct to survive has "warned" a species that its survival was doomed through rise of some hostile element in...
I have read bits and pieces on evolution and its theories.
If someone could simplify it and tell me in a way the average person understands I would be grateful.:)
Also how much of it has been proven without doubt and how much remains to be researched?
Also if you could give examples of...
As I understand it, according to Evolution Theory, in the vast passage of time in the past a species has gradually evolved (and will evolve in future) into another species when (1) the instinct to survive has "warned" a species that its survival was doomed through rise of some hostile element in...